I think they kind of overdid the whole "V is a merc and no one really trusts mercs" idea. I laughed when, after beating the best shooter of 69 Street I got a fancy weapon and the dude told me like "oh yeah, you are amazing and you've set a new record for OUR WHOLE DAMN GANG, but you know if our boys on the street as much as think you looked at them funny, we're gonna whoop your sorry ass".
like come on, even Geralt didn't incur as much violence on himself as V does, and he's considered one of the most abhorrent things in his universe.
So. Lots of people are not OK with how the story ended.
Many people who are OK with it, played the penam route and believe in a cure.
Most peoe think that it's a cliffhanger and cliffhanger would mean new post ending content.
I wonder what happens if there is no post ending content.
Many people who are OK with it, played the penam route and believe in a cure.
Most peoe think that it's a cliffhanger and cliffhanger would mean new post ending content.
I wonder what happens if there is no post ending content.
we save our money, uninstall the game and go on with our lives.
then maybe 8 years later in the middle of especially boring TGA they show a trailer with
Those guys were so obnoxious that simply saying that you don't care what their leader thinks of you incites them to attack you on site. I completely agree that this doesn't make sense. They shouldn't care as long as they can have a mutually beneficial relationship. This makes them all seem like a bunch of children.
If there is no post ending content I will be not playing Cyberpunk in years. I have to good memory for stories so it will be probably 5 or 10 years. I still remember most of Morrowind quests.. so you know
Game has huge identity crisis. It was suppose to be RPG, then they shifted it to open world-adventure, but it's neither good RPG neither good action-adventure open world at this moment.
Also i'm still hugely dissapointed that they had Keanu Reeves and we got no gun fu in game. Smh.
Also i'm still hugely dissapointed that they had Keanu Reeves and we got no gun fu in game. Smh.
It somehow reminds me of borderlands. Minus the iconic, lovable, interesting antagonist.
Well Borderlands is a good open world action adventure game with lots of interesting guns as loot, so, hmm..
The problem of attacking Arasaka with Aldecados is that many people die and so does Saul.
And I think it's better to leave him alive because the arguing between Saul and Panam is funny, and it would be better in Arizona with the 2 arguing.
Also, Panam will have more time for V and to go for a drive in NC.
And I think it's better to leave him alive because the arguing between Saul and Panam is funny, and it would be better in Arizona with the 2 arguing.
Also, Panam will have more time for V and to go for a drive in NC.
Last edited:
How strange. I didn't know that was what I was buying. oh well
Mostly because of the many commercials and trailers they showed us prior the release, I think the majority of people expected something else, me included.
Sometimes I wish people would stop simping for Panam and Judy and start thinking with their heads.
Post automatically merged:
I'll take that demo they showed in 2018 instead of what I bought.
I'd be concerned if they didn't. Still you see people saying there was not even a hint of false advertising or anything similar.
Anyway, back to the endings.
That's true, I don't see real hints to false advertisement, only the way they were explaining what this game will be and the final product don't really match. What we saw in 2018 demo is still ingame, in some way... so I'm not disappointed but I expected way more but yes let's go back to the topic, they can still bring this game back on track with DLC's and "cut" content, maybe some cut side missions and expanding V's story would definitely not hurt.
Only way to save the game is do what No Man's Sky did, add everything that was promised and even a lot more.