Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
  • STORY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 THE WITCHER TALES
  • GAMEPLAY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 MODS (THE WITCHER) MODS (THE WITCHER 2) MODS (THE WITCHER 3)
  • TECHNICAL
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 (PC) THE WITCHER 2 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (PC) THE WITCHER 3 (PLAYSTATION) THE WITCHER 3 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (SWITCH)
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
Menu

Register

[Spoilers] Confused about vampires in Blood and Wine and the Witcherverse

+
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Go to page

M

Maerd

Senior user
#41
Jun 17, 2016
SMiki55 said:
Not mention however about immortality... for me, it is clearly that after incineration, atomizing or antimatter annihilation they cannot recover. Maybe "immortality" actually means that each higher vampire is able to resurrect another one?
Click to expand...
We should add to these methods also melting in some acids, which essentially would turn tissues into the heap of inorganic compounds, which is has the same type of damage as incineration (turn tissues into oxides) or separation into single atoms and smaller particles (like in nuclear explosion).
If we talk about resurrection then we still need to define what the higher vampire is. If the idea of some vampire is enough then it's equal to being a deity. If we, say, compare this to being a human then human is not just DNA, because even now you can rather easily "resurrect" (clone) a human being from DNA sample but it will be a different human with the same DNA code, because what constitutes a particular person is defined by the brain neural connections, which are trained to recognize certain patterns that happen during lifetime of the particular individual. Reconstructing/resurrecting something from atoms would require absolute knowledge of all that individual's experience including self-processed experiences, which also makes the reconstructor a deity because it's possible only if the reconstructor possesses intraspecies omniscience (aka every higher vampire would know everything what all other higher vampires are doing, feeling, thinking, etc.). So, no matter how you turn it, TW3 describe vampires essentially as gods.

Alexius321 said:
But I think it's best to view them as being biologically immortal, which does not exclude death by some other mechanism.
Click to expand...
That would be great but that's not how the game describes vampires. It's explained in the game that vampires don't afraid death because they cannot be killed and cannot die. It's pretty clear that they suggest full scale immortality as immortality of, say, antique gods. Speaking of biological immortality, witchers are probably close to be biologically immortal since none of them died of old age.

SMiki55 said:
On the one hand, there is already at least one One-Gender Race – dryads (presumably thanks to mutagens composing Water of Brokilon).
Click to expand...
Technically dryads are not separate species they are just mild mutants like witchers, which contrary to the latter remained fertile. Or you can call them subspecies or a breed if you want. You know, like dogs or cats, which can come in various forms and shapes but can breed with each other no problem.

SMiki55 said:
If any of vampire species is single-gender, I assume it would simply breed with other vampire species (like dryads do with humanoids).
Click to expand...
By definition of species, different species cannot breed with each other leaving viable offsprings who are able to reproduce, otherwise they are not different species. :) Single gender won't cut it, because in this case they wouldn't have sexual reproductive organs, which they definitely have.

SMiki55 said:
Hermaphrodite, nah... I believe, on the other hand, that at least higher vampires would be able to clonal fragmentation - you now, if half of their body is too far from the other half
Click to expand...
Hermaphrodite by definition should have both male and female reproductive organs... so, no. Cloning also doesn't make sense because then they would need for reproductive organs at all, like bacteria.


Alexius321 said:
A very scholarly hypothesis, I must say ... Dettlaff regenerating his cut off hand, while at the same time Dettlaff's cut off hand regenerating the rest of Dettlaff?
Click to expand...
Yeah, good question. If we chop Dettlaff into 20 equal (by mass) pieces and put them into 20 separate boxes, which part will regenerate into Dettlaff? All of them? :D
 
A

Alexius321

Rookie
#42
Jun 17, 2016
@Maerd The problem here is, I think, that if we take this kind of ‘scientific’ approach and try to explain everything, we can arrive at an infinite number of conclusions and not one of them will be definite due to the lack of evidence. I am not against such discussion just for the fun of it, but I personally prefer the fantasy-like approach where not everything is explained; the examples are there simply to serve the story. Sapkowski had this kind of approach in the novels, while the games tried to do more.

Technically dryads are not separate species they are just mild mutants like witchers, which contrary to the latter remained fertile.
Click to expand...
Not sure about this, but I don’t think dryads are mutants. Pure-blood dryads are a single-sex species (female-only) and they mate with other humanoids, e.g. humans or elves. We may consider ‘mutants’ only those which were subject to drinking the Water of Brokilon (abducted girls), but that’s because they as a species are dying out so they try to compensate. Those like Braenn/Mona are not ‘pure-blood’ dryads, but others that are pure-blood should not be regarded as mutants I suppose.

Single gender won't cut it, because in this case they wouldn't have sexual reproductive organs, which they definitely have.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. There are a few examples of female only species in our world, for example New Mexico whiptail lizards. This is just one example of Parthenogenesis as a form of asexual reproduction. So it might be possible for some subspecies of vampires to be single-sex, though this is again simply a wild speculation. New topic: which vampire sub-species lay eggs? :D

Yeah, good question. If we chop Dettlaff into 20 equal (by mass) pieces and put them into 20 separate boxes, which part will regenerate into Dettlaff? All of them?
Click to expand...
All of them, of course. Moreover, Dettlaff doesn’t even need to be chopped up, he is in an infinite loop, that's why he's so jumpy :D

 
Sephira

Sephira

Forum veteran
#43
Jun 17, 2016
At this point it's safe to draw a line between book lore and game lore. While BaW tries to compensate discrepancies. It's also safe to assume that maybe male counterparts of Alps and Bruxae didn't make to Witcherverse. Or! We don't never ever meet one, and we just fight females because it's like that.

SMiki55 said:
Is that an official translation? Thumb down for translator then

In original Polish version Regis clearly states that it never happens in case of higher vampires and bruxas, nosferats etc. The problem is, even Polish people tend to misread this "and".
Click to expand...
Alexius321 said:
Yes, and it seems that it’s the same in other translations, though I can’t vouch for every single one.
Click to expand...
I was so scared about this that I checked the italian one and now I am sure that I can least vouch for it... thank Melitele it's correct, Regis does explain the difference, though I can't read the original text, I'm just basing my statement from what I've read here.

That's how it's translated (bold text for that key word)

"Non prendermi in giro. Avrai visto più di una volta delle tracce di morso di vampiro. Ti sei mai imbattuto nel caso di un vampiro che aveva fatto a pezzi la propria vittima?"
"No. Non succede mai."
"Mai nel caso dei vampiri superiori", disse Emiel Regis in tono amabile. "E da quanto mi risulta neppure alp, katakan, mule, bruxe e nosferat straziano così le vittime. Mentre fleder ed ekimme riservano un trattamento piuttosto brutale ai loro cadaveri."

Which can be translated in english as

"Don't mock me. You must have seen more than once the traces of vampire bite. Have you ever came across the case of a vampire who had dismembered his victim? "
"No. It never happens. "
"Never in the case of higher vampires," said Emiel Regis amiably. "And to my knowledge not even alp, katakan, mules, bruxae and nosferat mangle the victims to such this point. While fleder and ekimmae reserve a pretty brutal treatment to their bodies."
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Alexius321
M

Maerd

Senior user
#44
Jun 17, 2016
Alexius321 said:
The problem here is, I think, that if we take this kind of ‘scientific’ approach and try to explain everything, we can arrive at an infinite number of conclusions and not one of them will be definite due to the lack of evidence. I am not against such discussion just for the fun of it, but I personally prefer the fantasy-like approach where not everything is explained; the examples are there simply to serve the story. Sapkowski had this kind of approach in the novels, while the games tried to do more.
Click to expand...
Indeed, the biggest mistake CDPR made with vampires: they unsuccessfully tried to turn fantasy into science fiction by explaining everything, which was absolutely unnecessary. Here we have full agreement.

Alexius321 said:
Not sure about this, but I don’t think dryads are mutants. Pure-blood dryads are a single-sex species (female-only) and they mate with other humanoids, e.g. humans or elves. We may consider ‘mutants’ only those which were subject to drinking the Water of Brokilon (abducted girls), but that’s because they as a species are dying out so they try to compensate. Those like Braenn/Mona are not ‘pure-blood’ dryads, but others that are pure-blood should not be regarded as mutants I suppose.
Click to expand...
Well, if original dryads were created by mutating humans then they are still mutants even if they later can breed with humans and give birth to dryads. Mutation in general sense is just a change that was achieved by using conscious manipulations with organism. So, dryads fit here. If we'll take genetics then any change is a mutation therefore even different human beings differ from each other by mutations. But to call somebody a mutant we need some critical mass of mutations to make a distinctive feature that would unambiguously and significantly differ this individual (such feature cannot appear by itself in the general population) from the rest of the pack. As I said, you can call dryads subspecies if you don't like the word 'mutant'. :)

Alexius321 said:
Not necessarily. There are a few examples of female only species in our world, for example New Mexico whiptail lizards. This is just one example of Parthenogenesis as a form of asexual reproduction. So it might be possible for some subspecies of vampires to be single-sex, though this is again simply a wild speculation. New topic: which vampire sub-species lay eggs?
Click to expand...
Awesome. So, bruxas and alps are parthanogenetic vampires then. :D
 
SMiki55

SMiki55

Mentor
#45
Jun 17, 2016
Maerd said:
Reconstructing/resurrecting something from atoms would require absolute knowledge of all that individual's experience including self-processed experiences, which also makes the reconstructor a deity because it's possible only if the reconstructor possesses intraspecies omniscience (aka every higher vampire would know everything what all other higher vampires are doing, feeling, thinking, etc.). So, no matter how you turn it, TW3 describe vampires essentially as gods.
Click to expand...
Remember that, at least in the games, Geralt encountered a couple of intelligeng ghosts of died people. Assuming that other species, including vampires, also have those "souls", there wouldn't be necessity to have any "omniscience" during resurrecting it - a copy of psyche (soul) already exists. A vampire could be able to kill another vampire permanently by destroying his "soul" - copy of psyche.

Maerd said:
Technically dryads are not separate species they are just mild mutants like witchers, which contrary to the latter remained fertile. Or you can call them subspecies or a breed if you want.
Click to expand...
Maerd said:
By definition of species, different species cannot breed with each other leaving viable offsprings who are able to reproduce, otherwise they are not different species.
Click to expand...
I am aware of this, just English is not my native language. "Subspecies" or "race" would be the right words :)

Maerd said:
Cloning also doesn't make sense because then they would need for reproductive organs at all, like bacteria.
Click to expand...
Assuming that higher vampires appeared due to the natural evolution... nor, for example, genetic manipulations of the "lesser" ones. (There is already an interesting theory about elves and dryads being just "improved" version of humans, with modified telomerase gene.)
 
A

Alexius321

Rookie
#46
Jun 17, 2016
@Sephira , @SMiki55 that seems to be correct. I have also checked the Serbian translation and it reads:

In the case of higher vampires it never happens…. As far as I know, they do not mutilate their victims as much as alps, katakans, moolas, bruxae and nosferats do. On the other hand, fleders and ekimas are pretty brutal with their victims’ remains.
Click to expand...
So there seems to be a distinction, thanks for bringing it up.

P. S. The line between the book lore and game lore has been drawn much, much earlier in my opinion :D

Maerd said:
Well, if original dryads were created by mutating humans then they are still mutants even if they later can breed with humans and give birth to dryads.
Click to expand...
The thing is, I don’t think that the original, pure-blood dryads were created by mutating humans. At least it is not stated in the books, as far as I remember. We can assume that dryads, naiads, nereids, rusalkas, vilas, etc, etc. are simply different types of a nymph. It is analogous with our mythology where we have water nymphs, forest nymphs etc, etc. Those ‘mutated’ do not count, of course.

Therefore, maybe we can assume that nymphs are a separate 'species' in the Witcher world and these different types of nymphs are simply cousins. Though, it is still unclear whether nymphs are a species, but I suppose we can regard them as such in this case.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Sephira
SMiki55

SMiki55

Mentor
#47
Jun 17, 2016
Even simplier theory - nymphs could be also just post-Conjunction guests from an alternative universe, where the evolution followed slightly different paths, but not so different to rule out the possibility of interbreeding with other humanoids :)
 
A

Alexius321

Rookie
#48
Jun 17, 2016
Possible, but maybe they are one of the elder 'races' (or whatever we may call them) and are native to the Witcher world. Who knows.

Another problem with different universes and different evolution paths is also the possible difference in the laws of physics in those worlds. Again, strictly scientific approach does not work here in my opinion

---------- Updated at 03:24 PM ----------

Also, them being the elder 'race', 'beings', 'things'... seems more likely since they seem to use Elder Speech dialects. Vampires are newcomers, in any case
 
Sephira

Sephira

Forum veteran
#49
Jun 17, 2016
SMiki55 said:
Assuming that higher vampires appeared due to the natural evolution... nor, for example, genetic manipulations of the "lesser" ones. (There is already an interesting theory about elves and dryads being just "improved" version of humans, with modified telomerase gene.)
Click to expand...
Honestly, telomerase gene theory is not just a theory but the real explanation for that matter. Bingo. :D

Alexius321 said:
The thing is, I don’t think that the original, pure-blood dryads were created by mutating humans. At least it is not stated in the books, as far as I remember. We can assume that dryads, naiads, nereids, rusalkas, vilas, etc, etc. are simply different types of a nymph. It is analogous with our mythology where we have water nymphs, forest nymphs etc, etc. Those ‘mutated’ do not count, of course.

Therefore, maybe we can assume that nymphs are a separate 'species' in the Witcher world and these different types of nymphs are simply cousins. Though, it is still unclear whether nymphs are a species, but I suppose we can regard them as such in this case.
Click to expand...
I agree.

---------- Updated at 04:42 PM ----------

Alexius321 said:
P. S. The line between the book lore and game lore has been drawn much, much earlier in my opinion
Click to expand...
Heh I did that long ago, I meant it's safe to draw another line for the vampires as well. :D
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Alexius321
SMiki55

SMiki55

Mentor
#50
Jun 17, 2016
One more thing about vampires' singularity - they (at least the higher ones) cast no shadow and are not reflected in mirrors - that could be the evidence they came from the universe of different laws of physics.
 
A

Alexius321

Rookie
#51
Jun 17, 2016
SMiki55 said:
One more thing about vampires' singularity - they (at least the higher ones) cast no shadow and are not reflected in mirrors - that could be the evidence they came from the universe of different laws of physics.
Click to expand...
Not exactly what I had in mind regarding the laws of physics, but it may be something connected with their body structure, i.e. they probably aren’t a carbon-based life form. There are various theories about possible types of biochemistry and conditions for life, though none have been proven so far. Don’t tell me there are no original Star Trek fans here, don’t you remember the silicon-based devil in the dark :D

Now forget all this nonsense that I wrote. The mirror-reflection thing is almost certainly simply a Dracula rip-off :D

P. S. They made another mistake, Regis and Dettlaff do cast a shadow in BaW
 
Last edited: Jun 17, 2016
  • RED Point
Reactions: SMiki55
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Go to page

Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.