While some people wnated a happy ending, the main reason for the backlash were due to 2 things.
1st was illogical aspcets of the ending, like why my team leaves me behind after a few hours they told me that they will stay with me no matter what. Also the motivation for the Reaper action was kind of wierd as you could prove them wrong during the geth quarian missions.
2nd was the fact that they reduced a whole trilogy worth a decision making to one final decision, which lead to a one minute cutscene with 3 different colors esentially.
I think non of this is true about CP2077 as you have endings which can be significantly different, and that is why we only see a few people complaining about it.
This is the part where I strongly disagree with the folks around here. Just because you want to interpret certain parts of the ending in a negative way, that does not mean that is the only way. To me the Nomat ending is quite positive, even if still bittersweet on some level.
but we're not here to say that we don't like the endings.
we are here to know where the dlc will take us and when because in gathering the details everything shows a dlc after the end or a game no matter there will be a sequel if they want it and if they can.
I agree with you all the endings are not bad and you have to take a step back to understand it.
and I would like to add that no matter the end in all cases people die V or the other characters we only limit losses on one side or the other and even if no one dies they all end up taking a different route.