Problably is before The Last Quest, The Endings are much diferent to have more Adventures With V ir Jhonny1) best case scenario for DLC they will extend ending somehow idk how but make good ending so you as "V" can continue new adventures
or
they will add new quest lines in the middle of main game.
2)worst case scenario they will force you to play as different character in some desolate place for few hours (example Johnny Silverhand) maybe you will play as Jackie or Goro or some new character. But i hate that idea though. if i cant play as V i wont care about dlc.
I Belive The First big expension gonna tell about The Peralez conspirace with who are try mess up her mermories1) best case scenario for DLC they will extend ending somehow idk how but make good ending so you as "V" can continue new adventures
or
they will add new quest lines in the middle of main game.
2)worst case scenario they will force you to play as different character in some desolate place for few hours (example Johnny Silverhand) maybe you will play as Jackie or Goro or some new character. But i hate that idea though. if i cant play as V i wont care about dlc.
Just want our V, Panam and Judy and others have chance to see their great finaleWe as fans have proved that there are countless ways to merge the endings together. we can create brilliant ideas from hints hidden in the game. So i guess that CDPR professional writers are gonna nail it and make almost everybody happy, we just have to wait until they break the silence.
There are special “endgame” saves for every different ending you’ve completed, they’re almost certainly going to release post endgame DLC.Problably is before The Last Quest, The Endings are much diferent to have more Adventures With V ir Jhonny
Post automatically merged:
I Belive The First big expension gonna tell about The Peralez conspirace with who are try mess up her mermories
Everybody here wants itJust want our V, Panam and Judy and others have chance to see their great finale![]()
None of the endings contain a copy of V though, they’re all the original V.I think I belong to the minority, but the Arasaka ending is really my favorite ending, when you choose to go back to earth.
You have 6 month to live, like in the Panam & Rogue ending, but you are still V and not some copy/engram. Apart from this none of my friends had to die, although it makes me sad that Johnny acted as if I had betrayed him. But at the end he is free, he (or his copy, whatever consciousness he has) is finally dead, and can rest in peace.
I also enjoyed the scenes with Takamura. He is very kind to me and helpful. I really loved it, when he told Hellmann in the Arasaka AV, that he won't be able to walk anymore when he didn't shut his mouth and keep talking about us in such a derogatory manner.
I really hope the DLC will give us the opportunity to continue different endings. I really want this ending to be my personal canon ending and hope this opens up the possibility to romance Goro Takemura!I don't want River! I hope he won't stay in Japan or come back to help us
...
Arasaka really took care of me by bringing me to the orbital station to take the biochip out and gave you an option to store yourself in Secure Your Soul program for free.
I don't like this ending since Panam/Judy will both leave you even if u decide to comeback to earth(i think it's a bug i dunno) f.e. Judy will send u a message where she tells you that she decided to leave the city and leave u behind. Hell a moment ago i spoke to her and she was waiting for me on earth. Just for her i decided to comeback and spend that 6 months with her and all i got is a fucking breakup?I think I belong to the minority, but the Arasaka ending is really my favorite ending, when you choose to go back to earth.
You have 6 month to live, like in the Panam & Rogue ending, but you are still V and not some copy/engram. Apart from this none of my friends had to die, although it makes me sad that Johnny acted as if I had betrayed him. But at the end he is free, he (or his copy, whatever consciousness he has) is finally dead, and can rest in peace.
I also enjoyed the scenes with Takamura. He is very kind to me and helpful. I really loved it, when he told Hellmann in the Arasaka AV, that he won't be able to walk anymore when he didn't shut his mouth and keep talking about us in such a derogatory manner.
I really hope the DLC will give us the opportunity to continue different endings. I really want this ending to be my personal canon ending and hope this opens up the possibility to romance Goro Takemura!I don't want River! I hope he won't stay in Japan or come back to help us
...
Arasaka really took care of me by bringing me to the orbital station to take the biochip out and gave you an option to store yourself in Secure Your Soul program for free.
Almost like they’re an afterthought because they’re planning to do post endgame DLC’s...all endings are weird in that in some of them some of your LIs leave you and in some not without V having any input and then you get really contradictory or inconclusive voice messages...another sign that the epilogues are pourly thought-out.
For me it means that in the last 6 months something changed(i mean production of the game not V) the whole ending feels rushed for me. We don't have any info on free dlc and expansions and i think it's because the witcher 3 storyline was well written even before the premiere. Here the story was constantly changing and it wouldn't be surprising if they changed the endings in april/may just to release the game in 2020 and changed the design of expansions from midstory to poststory. The endings in the game have too many narrative mistakes(like the one with judy i mentioned before ). We have proof that the game main story was totally scrapped in 2018, we also have official info from 2016 where we can learn that the game was completely scrapped and they started the work from the beginning.Almost like they’re an afterthought because they’re planning to do post endgame DLC’s...
Also for what ever reason we aren't taking this into account at all. Its a completely different game. Just because they said they were going to release DLC similar to TW3 that doesn't mean that the content will literally walk in the same footsteps as it also. Its a completely different game. I mean I've been thinking about this for a while now and what they meant by comparing the two was likely nothing more then them saying: "We are going to support this game with regular content like TW3". Not that the content will have a literal resemblance to exactly what was released in TW3. Its all really based on what they feel they want to do with the story. The character in the Witcher is someone who lives and doesn't have a story arch like 'V'. So to setup DLC in the same way with two unique story arch's doesn't make sense. Hopefully you all understand what I'm trying to say. Basically we cant say that just because TW got mid story content doesn't mean that Cyberpunk will. We might only get Post story content in cyberpunk for all we know. This wouldn't make sense for TW because they got multiple games one after another. So theres no need for post story content because they can continue it from game to game.I think another thing we can look at when it comes to The Witcher 3 only having mid-game DLC's and why they might change it this time to Post-Game is the fact that they said they cut the main story down because people weren't finishing it in TW3. With that game if they have only post game expansions, then most people wouldn't get a chance to play them cuz like they said, most people didn't finish the game. But since this time it's significantly shorter so they can build on the end of the game, because its much easier for people to get to it.
Obviously we will see small DLC that will likely share similarities, but big expansion content is definitely going to differ from TW3. At least that's what I believe and I could definitely be wrong. So until they really tell us its just gonna be constant guessing. Which hopefully will be addressed within the next month or so.Also for what ever reason we aren't taking this into account at all. Its a completely different game. Just because they said they were going to release DLC similar to TW3 that doesn't mean that the content will literally walk in the same footsteps as it also. Its a completely different game. I mean I've been thinking about this for a while now and what they meant by comparing the two was likely nothing more then them saying: "We are going to support this game with regular content like TW3". Not that the content will have a literal resemblance to exactly what was released in TW3. Its all really based on what they feel they want to do with the story. The character in the Witcher is someone who lives and doesn't have a story arch like 'V'. So to setup DLC in the same way with two unique story arch's doesn't make sense. Hopefully you all understand what I'm trying to say. Basically we cant say that just because TW got mid story content doesn't mean that Cyberpunk will. We might only get Post story content in cyberpunk for all we know. This wouldn't make sense for TW because they got multiple games one after another. So theres no need for post story content because they can continue it from game to game.
I think that somebody who haven't finished the main game wouldn't even buy the expansions.I think another thing we can look at when it comes to The Witcher 3 only having mid-game DLC's and why they might change it this time to Post-Game is the fact that they said they cut the main story down because people weren't finishing it in TW3. With that game if they have only post game expansions, then most people wouldn't get a chance to play them cuz like they said, most people didn't finish the game. But since this time it's significantly shorter so they can build on the end of the game, because its much easier for people to get to it.
I flip-flop on this a bit but according to Cyberpunk RED, Alt was only considered dead until after Johnny pulled the cord. She was going to escape back through the conduit but she lost control of Soulkiller due to Silverhand's attack. The wiki was updated to correct the record which was originally incomplete. The understanding of Soulkiller between Alt, engram Alt, and engram Johnny is really inconsistent.you are still V and not some copy/engram
This was my takeaway as well. I will say for certain that Neuromancer and Hearts of Stone influenced the writing here substantially. The major motivation for Case (Neuromancer) is exactly what V is going through - do the mission or you will die in 6 months.Also for what ever reason we aren't taking this into account at all. Its a completely different game. Just because they said they were going to release DLC similar to TW3 that doesn't mean that the content will literally walk in the same footsteps as it also. Its a completely different game. I mean I've been thinking about this for a while now and what they meant by comparing the two was likely nothing more then them saying: "We are going to support this game with regular content like TW3". Not that the content will have a literal resemblance to exactly what was released in TW3. Its all really based on what they feel they want to do with the story. The character in the Witcher is someone who lives and doesn't have a story arch like 'V'. So to setup DLC in the same way with two unique story arch's doesn't make sense. Hopefully you all understand what I'm trying to say. Basically we cant say that just because TW got mid story content doesn't mean that Cyberpunk will. We might only get Post story content in cyberpunk for all we know. This wouldn't make sense for TW because they got multiple games one after another. So theres no need for post story content because they can continue it from game to game.
In Witcher 3, they let people jump into both expansions with pre-made characters. CDPR says less than half of people made it past the Bloody Baron in Witcher 3. Whether this is because the story was too long or because the gameplay was just too rough is open for debate. Personally, by the time I got to Skellige I was completely exhausted. I think jumping people into Act 2 quickly was a good idea for Cyberpunk, though the relationship between V and Jackie is lacking due to the amount of time spent with the latter.I think another thing we can look at when it comes to The Witcher 3 only having mid-game DLC's and why they might change it this time to Post-Game is the fact that they said they cut the main story down because people weren't finishing it in TW3. With that game if they have only post game expansions, then most people wouldn't get a chance to play them cuz like they said, most people didn't finish the game. But since this time it's significantly shorter so they can build on the end of the game, because its much easier for people to get to it.
The main quest takes about 20 hours by itself, if people aren't done with it by June that's on them. For example Fallout 4 and Borderlands 2/3 have post story content and I think its fair to say those games have either the same or longer story lines (With significantly more side quest content). So if that's what they are worried about then we have a huge issue. I mean assuming it takes 100 hours for casual gamers to finish all the side quests, main story, and NCPD missions, that's 5 months from release which is when expansion DLC will likely be around the time of coming out.I think that somebody who haven't finished the main game wouldn't even buy the expansions.