Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
  • STORY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 THE WITCHER TALES
  • GAMEPLAY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 MODS (THE WITCHER) MODS (THE WITCHER 2) MODS (THE WITCHER 3)
  • TECHNICAL
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 (PC) THE WITCHER 2 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (PC) THE WITCHER 3 (PLAYSTATION) THE WITCHER 3 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (SWITCH)
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE)
FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE)
OTHER GAMES
Menu

Register

Spoilers [me3 ending ]

+
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …

    Go to page

  • 34
Next
First Prev 16 of 34

Go to page

Next Last
P

Pangaea666

Forum veteran
#301
Mar 17, 2012
A different ending...


Another one that made me thankful I had no liquids in my mouth...
 
Aver

Aver

Forum veteran
#302
Mar 18, 2012
I just finished the game. I loved this series. It WAS my favorite space opera universe (even better than SW). And ending killed it all. Now, I don't wanna go back to this universe ever again.
 
D

dragonbird

Ex-moderator
#303
Mar 18, 2012
I can't believe that knowyourmeme actually rejected it.
That must be the ultimate disgrace - not even being able to get a good meme out of your disaster. :(
 
Aver

Aver

Forum veteran
#304
Mar 18, 2012
http://9gag.com/gag/3430950/
 
D

dragonbird

Ex-moderator
#305
Mar 18, 2012
Aver said:
http://9gag.com/gag/3430950/
Click to expand...
You need to be a member to view it - quick summary please?
 
Garrison72

Garrison72

Mentor
#306
Mar 18, 2012
I think Ego Draconis had a worse ending, but that's about it. Terrible disappointment.
 
K

KnightofPhoenix

Rookie
#307
Mar 19, 2012
I am not sure what I hate more. The ending, or what they did to Cerberus.

I would mention how TW2 beats the crap out of it, but I feel it's insulting to the former to even say it.
 
Garrison72

Garrison72

Mentor
#308
Mar 19, 2012
KnightofPhoenix said:
I am not sure what I hate more. The ending, or what they did to Cerberus.

I would mention how TW2 beats the crap out of it, but I feel it's insulting to the former to even say it.
Click to expand...
Cerberus was the convenient and all pervasive bad guy since ME2. I wish they never would have included the idea. Boy, Cerberus had all sorts of resources to wage galactic war, on like...EVERYONE. Talk about a lazy plot device. It sucks cause there are parts of the game that I liked.
 
S

soldiergeralt

Forum veteran
#309
Mar 19, 2012
there's complaining like this after every bioware release. you'd think they'd learn by now.

but i'm sure the next bioware game is gonna reach at least 2 million pre-orders.
 
gregski

gregski

Moderator
#310
Mar 19, 2012
And the drama continues: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/17/mass-effect-3-ending-fighter-goes-to-the-ftc.aspx
 
M

mrowakus

Forum veteran
#311
Mar 19, 2012
I am replaying ME3 now. As I said before - it's not a bad game. However, I am firm in my statement that in terms of storytelling Bioware really dropped the ball. The plot-holes I mentioned before are becoming even more apparent. There are so many loose, unresolved threads that's not funny - it's just incompetent. The levels of plot convenience are very high - which is only augmented by the fact that many would have been trivial to fix.

For example: the whole Crucible deal - how it is conveniently found in a nick of a time, and how easily it is erected. Solution: make it so that unbeknowst to Shepard, the Citadel and Alliance actually took the Reaper threat seriously and started building the super-weapon after your demise at the start of ME2 (they had the plans for like 30 years). Shepard wasn't told that before because he worked for the Cerberus - which the Citadel intelligence services recognized as a threat. This could also explain why the Council was so slow in defending Human colonies in ME2 - most of their resources were invested in the Crucible project. Shepard only learns about the project during his mission on Mars where a team of scientists worked on the plans for the device. Tadam! Simple, logical, and much less jarring.
 
C

CostinRaz

Banned
#312
Mar 19, 2012
KnightofPhoenix said:
I am not sure what I hate more. The ending, or what they did to Cerberus.

I would mention how TW2 beats the crap out of it, but I feel it's insulting to the former to even say it.
Click to expand...
What they did with Cerberus is vastly worse for me. The main reason I oppose the change ending BS campaign is that it would make TIM an even bigger dumbass if they did change the endings.

Mrowakus: The Crucible was not built just by the Alliance. Hackett had the full support of The Shadow Broker on it from the very start, and then later on you get the Turians who help out, the Asari, Ex-Cerberus, potentially Rachni etc. I don't see the fact they were able to build it as a problem when you basically get a large portion of the galaxy to help you on it regardless of your choices.

Yes you don't get the ENTIRE Galaxy unless you make good choices, but you will always get the Turians/Asari/Geth or Quarian to help you.

However them finding the plans on Mars is too convenient, still I don't find it a major issue.

What they did with Cerberus...now that well is a different story.
 
M

mrowakus

Forum veteran
#313
Mar 19, 2012
CostinMoroianu said:
What they did with Cerberus is vastly worse for me. The main reason I oppose the change ending BS campaign is that it would make TIM an even bigger dumbass if they did change the endings.

Mrowakus: The Crucible was not built just by the Alliance. Hackett had the full support of The Shadow Broker on it from the very start, and then later on you get the Turians who help out, the Asari, Ex-Cerberus, potentially Rachni etc. I don't see the fact they were able to build it as a problem when you basically get a large portion of the galaxy to help you on it regardless of your choices.
Click to expand...
First of all - as we both agree - the moment of finding the plans is just too convenient. Secondly, with whole starsystems in disarray, shattered trading routes, and chaos in logistics it's a miracle they even have the materials to build the damn thing and even more of a 'halleluiah' that they can build it from the plans passed by an ancient civilization REALLY FAST. That's some major plot convenience that simply blows supsension of disbelief away.

Note here, that my solution fixes all of the abovesaid issues. The fact that what you need to do to repair this major plot convenience is to use a little bit of common sense makes it even more abysmal.

On the side note, another plothole - with the new Prothean companion we learn that Protheans communicated via touch - thus the whole business with Prothean beacons being hard to understand. So far so good. However, their plans for super-duper weapon are "surprisingly elegant, and easy to comprehend..." So let me get it straight - the warnings about the impending invasion of the Reapers are extremely hard to discern, but plans for a super-weapon which can be used in a variety of different, nefarious ways (i.e. destroying all electronic technology on a whole planet) are not only not encrypted but also "easy to comprehend". Someone's trolling me.

Yes you don't get the ENTIRE Galaxy unless you make good choices, but you will always get the Turians/Asari/Geth or Quarian to help you.

However them finding the plans on Mars is too convenient, still I don't find it a major issue.
Click to expand...
If it were the only issue I would let it slide. However, after being exposed to similar issues time and time again, one can hardly say that the story or the presentation of it was good. While I agree, there are many good scenes (e.g. everything with Garrus, the scene with Thane in the hospital etc.) on the micro scale, when you string them together in macro, you realise how much of a patchwork the story really is. It's hardly what I call professional.

What they did with Cerberus...now that well is a different story.
Click to expand...
Tell me more about it.
 
C

CostinRaz

Banned
#314
Mar 19, 2012
As I said the plans are convenient, them building the crucible isn't.

And not all trade routes are shattered, the Alliance economy is but we know from an e-mail that the galactic economy could still survive an entire year, and we have Udina for a time doing the best he can to supply Hackett and we Liara pulling every string she has, and she has a LOT of strings to pull.

Tell me more about it.
Click to expand...
Them opposing Shepard finding a cure for the genophage is something I can understand, all the way to them planning to detonate that bomb on Tuchanka. I mean after all TIM doesn't know of the deal Shepard can get from the Salarians, and he is afraid of the threat the Krogans can pose to the galaxy if the genophage is cured. Which I don't find an unreasonable PoV. I oppose it, but it's not stupid to have it.

The parts that piss me off are the Coup. Seriously Bioware did we need that bullshit?

Then there is TIM implanting himself with Reaper technology to go to the Reapers and tell them Shepard is about to deliver the Crucible....that just sucks so hard, but hey we need a reason to have the Citadel moved to Earth...right.
 
D

dragonbird

Ex-moderator
#315
Mar 19, 2012
gregski said:
And the drama continues: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/17/mass-effect-3-ending-fighter-goes-to-the-ftc.aspx
Click to expand...
I assume that the FTC is responsible for "false advertising" claims? (I'm not that familiar with the way this works in the US).

If the guy concerned thinks that the game isn't "as advertised", then I guess he has the right to make the complaint. Bioware is a business like any other, and there's no reason why they should be exempt from the rules. It all depends on whether or not they did falsely advertise it though, and how much was just over-high expectations.
 
C

CostinRaz

Banned
#316
Mar 19, 2012
Most of what is being said on the internet right now in regards to the endings is bullshit. People are for the most part are pissed about not having a happy ending ( and I DARE anyone to suggest that isn't the case ). Sure there are people who make good points, but they are overwhelmed by the screaming.

Many don't even give a damn about the Relays, they feel it's perfectly fine.

Knight: Before you continue praising TW2 I should remind you of the mess they did with Shani.

To you it's irrelevant, to me it's something just as bad as what Bioware did with Udina or TIM. That most fans choose Triss doesn't change the fact choosing Shani was a major decision to make and that quite a few liked her a lot, and then they completely ignored that. Just like the fact most people want to kill TIM doesn't change the fact some don't.

I may love TW2, but I sure as hell haven't forgotten about CDPR did. Certainly the free DLC, 2.0, and now the Enhanced Edition were very nice and made respect CDPR I am still very angry at them for ignoring this.
 
L

lycos

Senior user
#317
Mar 19, 2012
CostinMoroianu said:
The parts that piss me off are the Coup. Seriously Bioware did we need that bullshit?
Click to expand...
The entire coup was garbage. The worst part is that it could have been brilliant.

Apparently in the codex afterwards it mention that Udina was trying to stage a quiet coup so as to send the citadel fleet to join the Sword fleet, as he had gotten tired of the other councillors stalling and waffling (esp the Asari). The Salarian councillor found out and was going to blow the whole thing.

And this is where it goes into stupid territory - instead of given Shepherd options like make the salarian councillor go away or shut up and hence get the Citadel fleet (a real renegade choice), or blowing the story and getting paragon points but losing assets - it just becomes a basic "run & gun".

You could have had and entire series of missions on cloak and dagger stuff on the citadel as opposed to "put bullet in cerberus drone #9567".
 
C

CostinRaz

Banned
#318
Mar 19, 2012
Yeah I know Lyc, I know. It annoys the hell out of me. It could have been the point where you can have Cerberus join Shepard, but nope we need to have retarded shit just for the sake of it.
 
K

KnightofPhoenix

Rookie
#319
Mar 19, 2012
CostinMoroianu said:
Knight: Before you continue praising TW2 I should remind you of the mess they did with Shani.

To you it's irrelevant, to me it's something just as bad as what Bioware did with Udina or TIM. That most fans choose Triss doesn't change the fact choosing Shani was a major decision to make and that quite a few liked her a lot, and then they completely ignored that. Just like the fact most people want to kill TIM doesn't change the fact some don't.

I may love TW2, but I sure as hell haven't forgotten about CDPR did.
Click to expand...
What? Did CDPR take Shani and turn her into an idiotic lunatic or a mind controlled tool that starts doing things completely opposed to what she believes in and that is in the interests of the big bad trying to destroy the universe?
What they did was bad, but no where near as insulting or ridiculous.

TIM sabotaging the cure of the genophage makes sense, but deliberately provoking war between Turians and Krogans makes absolutely no sense other than from a Reaper interest perspective, just like most of his actions.

And the hilarious bit was, the Reapers already indoctrinated people like that in the Prothean cycle, made me want to laugh and cry.
 
227

227

Forum veteran
#320
Mar 19, 2012
dragonbird said:
It all depends on whether or not they did falsely advertise it though, and how much was just over-high expectations.
Click to expand...


Unnecessary lawsuit, but hopefully it curbs some of the marketing talk companies put out pre-release.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …

    Go to page

  • 34
Next
First Prev 16 of 34

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.