A different ending...
Another one that made me thankful I had no liquids in my mouth...
Another one that made me thankful I had no liquids in my mouth...
You need to be a member to view it - quick summary please?Aver said:http://9gag.com/gag/3430950/
Cerberus was the convenient and all pervasive bad guy since ME2. I wish they never would have included the idea. Boy, Cerberus had all sorts of resources to wage galactic war, on like...EVERYONE. Talk about a lazy plot device. It sucks cause there are parts of the game that I liked.KnightofPhoenix said:I am not sure what I hate more. The ending, or what they did to Cerberus.
I would mention how TW2 beats the crap out of it, but I feel it's insulting to the former to even say it.
What they did with Cerberus is vastly worse for me. The main reason I oppose the change ending BS campaign is that it would make TIM an even bigger dumbass if they did change the endings.KnightofPhoenix said:I am not sure what I hate more. The ending, or what they did to Cerberus.
I would mention how TW2 beats the crap out of it, but I feel it's insulting to the former to even say it.
First of all - as we both agree - the moment of finding the plans is just too convenient. Secondly, with whole starsystems in disarray, shattered trading routes, and chaos in logistics it's a miracle they even have the materials to build the damn thing and even more of a 'halleluiah' that they can build it from the plans passed by an ancient civilization REALLY FAST. That's some major plot convenience that simply blows supsension of disbelief away.CostinMoroianu said:What they did with Cerberus is vastly worse for me. The main reason I oppose the change ending BS campaign is that it would make TIM an even bigger dumbass if they did change the endings.
Mrowakus: The Crucible was not built just by the Alliance. Hackett had the full support of The Shadow Broker on it from the very start, and then later on you get the Turians who help out, the Asari, Ex-Cerberus, potentially Rachni etc. I don't see the fact they were able to build it as a problem when you basically get a large portion of the galaxy to help you on it regardless of your choices.
If it were the only issue I would let it slide. However, after being exposed to similar issues time and time again, one can hardly say that the story or the presentation of it was good. While I agree, there are many good scenes (e.g. everything with Garrus, the scene with Thane in the hospital etc.) on the micro scale, when you string them together in macro, you realise how much of a patchwork the story really is. It's hardly what I call professional.Yes you don't get the ENTIRE Galaxy unless you make good choices, but you will always get the Turians/Asari/Geth or Quarian to help you.
However them finding the plans on Mars is too convenient, still I don't find it a major issue.
Tell me more about it.What they did with Cerberus...now that well is a different story.
Them opposing Shepard finding a cure for the genophage is something I can understand, all the way to them planning to detonate that bomb on Tuchanka. I mean after all TIM doesn't know of the deal Shepard can get from the Salarians, and he is afraid of the threat the Krogans can pose to the galaxy if the genophage is cured. Which I don't find an unreasonable PoV. I oppose it, but it's not stupid to have it.Tell me more about it.
I assume that the FTC is responsible for "false advertising" claims? (I'm not that familiar with the way this works in the US).gregski said:And the drama continues: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/17/mass-effect-3-ending-fighter-goes-to-the-ftc.aspx
The entire coup was garbage. The worst part is that it could have been brilliant.CostinMoroianu said:The parts that piss me off are the Coup. Seriously Bioware did we need that bullshit?
What? Did CDPR take Shani and turn her into an idiotic lunatic or a mind controlled tool that starts doing things completely opposed to what she believes in and that is in the interests of the big bad trying to destroy the universe?CostinMoroianu said:Knight: Before you continue praising TW2 I should remind you of the mess they did with Shani.
To you it's irrelevant, to me it's something just as bad as what Bioware did with Udina or TIM. That most fans choose Triss doesn't change the fact choosing Shani was a major decision to make and that quite a few liked her a lot, and then they completely ignored that. Just like the fact most people want to kill TIM doesn't change the fact some don't.
I may love TW2, but I sure as hell haven't forgotten about CDPR did.
dragonbird said:It all depends on whether or not they did falsely advertise it though, and how much was just over-high expectations.