its not about it, its wider than that. It means that the company is not fully decided on what they want for this game. The nudity is just an inch, but you can clear see that many cut content was made from an old demo. Thats time wasting and money wasting.Is this going to be the full nudity justice movement?
Quite interesting to see an uproar about cocks on an online forum lol.
true...and technically the same thing would apply here to in-game nudity, if it wasn't there in the version they had rated. Obviously CDPR had reason to be concerned that full nudity in game might alter the rating of the game. Otherwise, it would be in the game, yes?It wasnt a mod it was a feature ingame that you could actually hijack it and re-enable it with a dll![]()
Not sure how much actual "promotion" there was on CDPR's side. Did they claim that there will be full nudity during the game and made a big deal out of it? If I remember correctly the whole thing blew up with the previews of the game, when previewers described the options for gender-mixing and stuff.If that was the case they should have told and not promoting nudity from the start. Right now, they become the sith,
I can clearly see that there are some people here that actually discuss what you mentioned.(like yourself)its not about it, its wider than that. It means that the company is not fully decided on what they want for this game. The nudity is just an inch, but you can clear see that many cut content was made from an old demo. Thats time wasting and money wasting.
For me (and many others probably) it's more about the principle of censorship. Let's be honest...the fact that there is an "uproar" about cocks (or genitalia) in general is the whole reason there is censorship in the first place. If there was no "uproar" we wouldn't be here discussing any of this. We'd just be enjoying the game and bitching about floating NPCs.Quite interesting to see an uproar about cocks on an online forum lol.
This. It's the fact that they promised something and then took it away at the last minute with no explaination other than, "Oh, it was always meant that wayFor me (and many others probably) it's more about the principle of censorship. Let's be honest...the fact that there is an "uproar" about cocks (or genitalia) in general is the whole reason there is censorship in the first place. If there was no "uproar" we wouldn't be here discussing any of this. We'd just be enjoying the game and bitching about floating NPCs.
Yeah, but if you don't want to run around nude you just get dressed. As for NPCs, they should be what they are, again developers taunted an adult game. In understand the option for streamers due to regulations, but in game ...The idea of it is to allow players to hide it if the wish to, yet, as the game stands right now, it doesn't really do much because your character is already censored by forced underwear, and not many NPC's show anything on free roam, not even a nipple.
I get that 100%!!!This. It's the fact that they promised something and then took it away at the last minute with no explaination other than, "Oh, it was always meant that way" as if we're all that stupid.
There is only so many things we can complain about at one time.I get that 100%!!!
I just think it is funny that the point of attack is the censoring cock 'n balls and not (for example) the missing subway-feature, car-costumization, hair stylists and what not.
Again. Im not attacking anybody here! I just think it is funny that the whole ordeal drifted into that direction.
This is undoubtedly important, even more important than nudity. BUT, there is one big "but": the function of nudity was already in the game, players who previously received their disks managed to see it. But when the game was released, it was largely cut out of the game world without explanation. all these things, like, hairdressers, customizing cars, and so on... were incomplete, cut out of the game due to pressure from the storna of investors and players to get the game out faster. I have no doubt that a lot of missing features will appear in the game with patches and DLC. but again - nudity in the game was, in full. it was not an unfinished function. They only made it so when it was released.I get that 100%!!!
I just think it is funny that the point of attack is the censoring cock 'n balls and not (for example) the missing subway-feature, car-costumization, hair stylists and what not.
Again. Im not attacking anybody here! I just think it is funny that the whole ordeal drifted into that direction.
I agree that this mature content is maybe weird to someone (like why someone tries to solve it), but the problem is...it IS already in the game, it was just patched. It's not like there was a subway/metro and with patch it disappeared. As many of us say, you can glitch yourself naked, and genitals have physics, like they react to gravity so it WAS cuatomized this way originally.I get that 100%!!!
I just think it is funny that the point of attack is the censoring cock 'n balls and not (for example) the missing subway-feature, car-costumization, hair stylists and what not.
Again. Im not attacking anybody here! I just think it is funny that the whole ordeal drifted into that direction.
That's a really good point actually......and genitals have physics, like they react to gravity so it WAS cuatomized this way originally.
As one guy said: For 18+ game about sexualized dystopian future Cyberpunk provides very few options to be sexy. Maybe modders create a lot of sexy clothing, if CDPR give to modders a good features.If a thing was supposed to be in game then it must be in game. If every kind of content is removed for censorship reason is a shame. Are we in 2020 ? I know ESRB and censorship range still are approved by proibitive mainstream platforms but we are on PC that is an open platform.