[Suggestions]NUDITY MEGATHREAD - Remove censorship and bring back what advertised

[MojoBreaker]

The mandatory underwear bait and switch make me mad. Last time I buy anything from CDPR at full price. It wasn't a big deal until they put it in their advertising. I don't like being lied to.

remember those cool quotes from CDPR

"Coming: When it’s ready” "
"We leave greed to others"

and this company was the one who keep every other company in line, the one everyone should look up to. The one setting up standarts.
But now i feel it doesn't look like that at all

 

[prime853]

remember those cool quotes from CDPR

"Coming: When it’s ready” "
"We leave greed to others"

and this company was the one who keep every other company in line, the one everyone should look up to. The one setting up standarts.
But now i feel it doesn't look like that at all

Yeah those aged like milk.

We really did hold CDPR do a better standard, not with unrealistic expectations but just general consumerism practices that ALL companies should follow and adhere too, but now with the ridiculous misleading marketing of the game, Technical issues and now problems people are having with refunds, its clear things were too good to be true.

 

[Gillian_Seed]

Yeah those aged like milk.

We really did hold CDPR do a better standard, not with unrealistic expectations but just general consumerism practices that ALL companies should follow and adhere too, but now with the ridiculous misleading marketing of the game, Technical issues and now problems people are having with refunds, its clear things were too good to be true.

Given all those things I've decided to make the case that CP2077 is the most dystopian game of all time.

I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts.

Is Cyberpunk 2077 the most dystopian game of all time? I make the case it is.

Welcome to "the dark future" where all kinds of bad is going down outside of your realm of experience until you realize that dark and bad is your exact experience. Around every corner it's dark and future, it's murder dark future gang dark future future. It's so dark and future it's future and...

forums.cdprojektred.com

 

[JC_Denton_86]

I got my screenshots early.

In all seriousness, it is kind of strange we live in a world where virtual decapitation is okay, but a vagina makes people cringe in terror. I saw the "you'll only be nude in character creation" coming tbh. I was surprised when we could still be fully nude in the inventory screen, and surprised even more when I could be fully nude in photo mode (day 1), especially on the ps4. But I wasn't surprised when they censored the nudity in photo mode and told us "that's how the nudity is intended". Yeah, bullshit.

If it wasn't intended how was I able to run around in my birthday suit the first few hours I played the game? Plain and simple proof. It was a censor patch.

Some big corpos got scared, and forced CDPR to patch in underwear as soon as they saw all those IDIOTIC streamers do character creation on live streams, without bothering to turn on the option that censors nudity, first chance they got. I'll bet any amount of money that's exactly what happened. Streamers like Pokimane and Pewdiepie have children watching their streams, and THEY SHOULD KNOW BETTER. We got ninja censored because streamers are dumb and corpos just can't wait to censor anything over any excuse. They all want that Disney money, and they know the best way to do that is make everything milquetoast and censor as much as possible. Starting with nudity. So, we have the streaming community and big business to thank for this fiasco.

And... I'm sorry but the response was a joke. Anyone who played at launch knew CDPR never intended that we were forced to wear underwear outside of the inventory screen. They even made it to where children are removed from photo mode, as if they knew people would look at their characters nude with that function.

With all that being said, I saw the full nudity from multiple angles. Nobody is missing much, believe me. The vagina looks "ok" at best and the best angle is the straight on view you get in creation/inventory menu. I'm sure pc modders will be able to give people their private parts back, and make them look better.

In summary, I don't care about full nudity in photo mode, but I do hate censorship. And this was blatant censorship. No doubt in my mind.

 

[Setzor21]

In summary, I don't care about full nudity in photo mode, but I do hate censorship. And this was blatant censorship. No doubt in my mind.

add in that all of the tiny selection romance opens for straight men are ugly old masculine looking crows.

 

[Gillian_Seed]

I got my screenshots early.

In all seriousness, it is kind of strange we live in a world where virtual decapitation is okay, but a vagina makes people cringe in terror. I saw the "you'll only be nude in character creation" coming tbh. I was surprised when we could still be fully nude in the inventory screen, and surprised even more when I could be fully nude in photo mode (day 1), especially on the ps4. But I wasn't surprised when they censored the nudity in photo mode and told us "that's how the nudity is intended". Yeah, bullshit.

If it wasn't intended how was I able to run around in my birthday suit the first few hours I played the game? Plain and simple proof. It was a censor patch.

Some big corpos got scared, and forced CDPR to patch in underwear as soon as they saw all those IDIOTIC streamers do character creation on live streams, without bothering to turn on the option that censors nudity, first chance they got. I'll bet any amount of money that's exactly what happened. Streamers like Pokimane and Pewdiepie have children watching their streams, and THEY SHOULD KNOW BETTER. We got ninja censored because streamers are dumb and corpos just can't wait to censor anything over any excuse. They all want that Disney money, and they know the best way to do that is make everything milquetoast and censor as much as possible. Starting with nudity. So, we have the streaming community and big business to thank for this fiasco.

And... I'm sorry but the response was a joke. Anyone who played at launch knew CDPR never intended that we were forced to wear underwear outside of the inventory screen. They even made it to where children are removed from photo mode, as if they knew people would look at their characters nude with that function.

With all that being said, I saw the full nudity from multiple angles. Nobody is missing much, believe me. The vagina looks "ok" at best and the best angle is the straight on view you get in creation/inventory menu. I'm sure pc modders will be able to give people their private parts back, and make them look better.

In summary, I don't care about full nudity in photo mode, but I do hate censorship. And this was blatant censorship. No doubt in my mind.

I think they call it the "carrot and the stick" strategy. Kind of sucks that's how even CDPR thinks of us though.

 

[Millionaires]

This is going to be long. I apologise for the spam.

Genital customisation like general character creation was bland anyway.

And truth be told i think nudity was simply included for the same reason as a lot of other things. Simply as an excuse for CDPR to say "Yeah our game has this!" and tout it for marketing reasons while forgetting that you cant just chuck in a couple of barebones features just to say you have it. it needs to be fleshed out and done properly. much like the "multi ending quests", Game changing dialogue options, and many other RPG elements

I think so, too. It was not a selling point for me. I was not screaming, “Genitals! Pre-order!” but I was excited for what it would bring. It was a step forwards. It was definitely a marketing gimmick. People latched onto it.

probably because for some reason they decided to include children NPCs that serve zero purpose other than to be there... this is part of the reason why there are no children NPCs in GTA5.

As someone who tends to play children, if possible, I honestly can say that they have no place in this setting. Immortal beings throw you out of the immersion quicker than a crash or a floating NPC. If Rockstar, the king of controversy, avoids something, there is a good reason. Most people dislike looking at children in a violent setting. I can understand, too. Like pets and animals, people will go full John Wick if a child is harmed.

I'm still trying to figure out several things along the "what was the point of *insert countless examples here*" thought line.

- What was the point of issue #215XY87 Nudity:

If you ask me, I'd say it was to give the player the illusion that they were going to be buying a mature adult themed game.

Some other for instances include:

- What was the point of issue #9KN248 Character Creator:

If you ask me, I'd say it was to give the player the illusion they were about to play a role playing game and hopefully pacify them enough so that CDPR could later market the games story and lore as a TV show and or movie. Truth is V is totally defined just like Geralt outside of your imagination and outside of actually stopping the game, pausing it etc in order to see some small reminder that "oh yeah, I created V".....no, no you didn't. Your so called V pretty much only exists in your imagination. The V that exists in game that you actually play is the V that will be (or was intended to be at the very least) sold to us again and again in TV shows and or movies.

- What was the point of issue #3774KS651 Drug Dealers That Sell Health Products:

In this case it's just funnier to pretend that CDPR has no idea what a dystopian dark future is outside of a paint job. The reality as to why drug dealers sell medicine instead of drugs is too depressing.

Disclaimer: It's possible I don't have any idea what I'm talking about it. I can only begin to guess about these things and have no idea what is worse, the possible absolute incompetence, the complete misrepresentation or the anticipatory greed.

At first, I thought you were being sarcastic. I am unsure on how to reply in case you indeed were. Text or speech, I cannot detect sarcasm at all… if I miss the mark, I apologise.

The character creator still has me disappointed. Granted, my PC is quite old and cannot run this game on max settings, but I still wanted to explore it. When I heard about it, everyone was claiming it was Black Desert Online 2.0. Five hours of character creation, details that mattered, and then, of course, genitals. They did not dismiss anything about it, they hyped it up. Instead, we got a character creator reminiscent of the Sims 2.

Having V do drugs would be amusing. You can make him drink. Mine will drink at any chance he can get… just so much missed or dropped.

I wish they would make a game where you could kill the kids. Every RPG with kids you always have to tolerate the insufferable little fucks lol I got pretty quick with console commands in skyrim and FO4 because i got sick of some snot nose hindering my journey with a snarky comment and not being able to respond with maximum violence. IM the fkn Dragon Born, I slay dragons, im not going to allow some little kid to disrespect me and now that im a modded out Cyber-Samurai im deffenetly not going to allow it.

Playin hopscotch? Thats a stabbin.
Asking for money?? Thats a double stabbin!
Make a snarky comment and ill kill every NPC in a 5 block radius and pretend some of them were their friends and family D:<

Seriously though, having kids in games is like having kids play in movies, It immediately lowers the quality by an order of magnitude. Probably for the same reasons because you have to suffer through and endure their terrible dialog.
Lemmy run around naked killing people with my baby ween flopping around and delete the kids from the game lol

First mod I get will be one to remove them. Even if it ruins a few side quests that feature them, I want them gone. Nudity or not, I am running around with blades in my arms, decapitating hundreds of people. Why is a child in this setting? Explain them away – hide them. No one is questioning where they are.

Writing dialogue for children is actually quite hard, because they are terrible people and they do things we hate. The issue is they have no redeeming factors at all and are either useless or absolute jerks. While I am not a fan of slaughtering children, digital or not, being able to give them a verbal lashing works wonders. Sadly, would be seen almost as bad as murdering them. Why does my street kid V just let kids trash talk him? I just killed twenty gang members yet this kid is talking some serious mess?

i like how some of the voice acted Regina dialogue has the staticy voice filter and some don't (sounds like she's talking right beside you on the map). you know they just shoehorned in a bunch of shit at the last minute.

I have had a few speeches do this. Takemura often has double vocielines. Sounds like he is next to me and on the radio at the same time.

 

[Gillian_Seed]

At first, I thought you were being sarcastic. I am unsure on how to reply in case you indeed were. Text or speech, I cannot detect sarcasm at all… if I miss the mark, I apologise.

I can't remember what it's called but there is some kind of name for those moments when reality and parody (in this case sarcasm) are so indistinguishable that it's almost impossible to tell them apart. As such, I think this is the most dystopian game of all time! Check out my case of it in the thread of my signature and be sure to be excited for next product! Oh yeah!

 

[code991]

Since we are talking about nudity, there was one thing that really annoyed me.

When creating the character, if you go with female V, you can choose the size of her breasts which is cool, more customization choices BUT in game all clothes are modeled with V's small breasts instead.

When you remove Vs clothes you will see how her breasts just grow bigger in front of your eyes, like they swap the small breasts with the bigger ones.

Why do we even have the option to choose their size then?

I thought that going bigger or smaller will influence how clothes look on V, I guess not.

It's yet another thing they have added to the game just to say they have it in-game.

 

[prime853]

Since we are talking about nudity, there was one thing that really annoyed me.

When creating the character, if you go with female V, you can choose the size of her breasts which is cool, more customization choices BUT in game all clothes are modeled with V's small breasts instead.

When you remove Vs clothes you will see how her breasts just grow bigger in front of your eyes, like they swap the small breasts with the bigger ones.

Why do we even have the option to choose their size then?

I thought that going bigger or smaller will influence how clothes look on V, I guess not.

It's yet another thing they have added to the game just to say they have it in-game.

This is 100% proof of why things like body size and muscularity werent in the game. unless you want body parts clipping through clothing then the items of clothing themselves also need to be altered to fit the different proportions. you can see small cases of this with super jacked characters in skyrim but for the most part they handled it super well

 

[Guest 3574638]

i just asked for a refund the game is not what they told us it will be.
And it seems they just lie to us all the time

 

[whizwart]

And you can't even kill them! I take full frontal for immortal kids anytime! lol


Edit: while on the topic... did anyone else find it wierd that kids had cyberware. Is that worth it? Don't they grow out of them in half a year?

Some countries outside the US have rating systems that automatically make a game Adults Only or "Not fit for sale" if you can hurt or kill kids or have depictions as such. Germany is the big one on this, with Australia and Britain also taking a dim, though less severe view. Most publishers, like Rockstar, just don't put kids in due to this.

 

[jordangold527]

Marketing.

 

[Zeliret]

Now when we know that "underwear issue" is not a bug:

I believe the community must know why we can customize penis/vagina but must see V in underwear as well as all other NPC in the game.

The game is 18+, so what the reason?
Was it a lie in a face of your players, CDPR?

Just need an explanation for such move. Why adults ppl can't see genitals in a video game (18+) but can see blood, dildos, drugs, prostitutes and so on.

 

[MojoBreaker]

Since we are talking about nudity, there was one thing that really annoyed me.

When creating the character, if you go with female V, you can choose the size of her breasts which is cool, more customization choices BUT in game all clothes are modeled with V's small breasts instead.

When you remove Vs clothes you will see how her breasts just grow bigger in front of your eyes, like they swap the small breasts with the bigger ones.

Why do we even have the option to choose their size then?

I thought that going bigger or smaller will influence how clothes look on V, I guess not.

It's yet another thing they have added to the game just to say they have it in-game.

its too much work, they would have to create every top armor in 3 different variants for each breast size.
well idk maybe they didnt think about or didnt care.

 

[Puncake8690]

I know there are a few posts on this issue already. I, however, think I took a different approach.

For the longest time, since I read this thread, I pondered the question that my mind seemed to be asking of me. The title, in case you are curious. Whenever I saw anything about this game, the fact that it had full-frontal, uncensored nudity was mentioned. It was not just the chest, like we expect, it had the other parts, too. Not only that, surprisingly, but the fact that you could customise your wang was another tidbit that was thrown around. Seeing an actual wang, outside of pornographic material, is almost unheard of in media. It is very, very rare. There are two videogames off the top of my head that actually have it: Conan Exiles and Rust.

So, naturally, this was going to be huge. A stepping stone, if you will. It was not only that you could see the wang. No, no. No, it was the fact you could also customise it. You see, I am certain the male obsession with the wang does not wane over age. We spent our youth graffiting them everywhere, defacing any and all surfaces with them. A constant source of research, the wang. “Is that one bigger than mine?”, “Does that one bend slightly?”, “How do I measure up to my friends?”, “Is it normal?” I could do an in-depth study on it, but I will not.

The simple point is that we live in a time where the media will smile whenever someone is sawed in half, whenever a war crime is committed, whenever some sort of gore happens, it is all fine. You show a nipple, however, and you are the worst person on earth. This bubble wrap nonsense is suffocating and Cyberpunk 2077 would be the air – which we all need. The game, in Australia, has an R18+ rating. Essentially, adults only. I doubt it has a similar rating everywhere. Australians fight wildlife daily, but our stance on media is quite tight-gripped and causes more issues than it solves. Sadly, I am too young to join the government to attempt to fix it. Soon, maybe in twenty years when I meet the age requirement – also, an age where I conveniently will not be playing videogames.

My point is as clear as a sunny day: why bother including the penis at all? Why let us see it in the character creation screen and the inventory screen? Why allow us to customise it? Why did I spend fifteen minutes deciding on size and appearance when it hardly matters? You sold us on the fact that it was possible… that there would be consequences for running around nude.

Honestly, dialogue for being nude would have been amazing. Running around naked, getting arrested, having people react to it. Having an impact. Imagine killing someone when nude and they mock themselves in their death throes? “How did I lose to a naked man with a small penis?” or even people commenting on the street, whether in awe or mocking. People comment on the size of the penis, whether it is cut or uncut. Imagine you hire a joytoy and he or she just laughs. Some people may feel emasculated by it, but I find it amusing and immersive. So much potential lost due to it. That is what has me the most upset… except for the promises that were broken.

I did not expect, nor do I want, pornography. I hardly expected there to be penetrative sex. However, the fact it existed and was something that mattered was there. It was a promise that was broken. It now sits upon a throne of other broken promises.

Forcing V to wear underwear was lazy. Enabling nudity should straight up enable nudity. Otherwise, it is a useless option that serves no purpose and should be removed. We see a vagina in the story. We see dildos in stores. We can see the bulge on the male joytoy. We can see it in the character creation screen. We can see it in the inventory screen. Why can we not see it when we take off all our clothes? What, in all honesty, is the difference? It can be seen in a menu, why can it not be seen in-game?

It is a useless feature that does nothing. Potential immersion and story-telling wasted. Just remove it. Remove the feature and no one will bat an eye as no one cares about a half-finished feature that was used as a marketing gimmick and nothing more.

I didn't see the point in genital customization at all tbh. Never comes up again besides where you can see it in places you mentioned, which is almost never. IMO it just seems something they added to stir up news, or because it was funny.

 

[JAD2012]

First things first, a fair warning from the moderators:

We have decided to re-open the thread now.

One caveat - if you use this thread as a place for political discussions, any sort of insults or personal attacks again - it will get closed for good.

We trust that our community can have a civilised discussion about the matter without breaking forum rules.

Let's move on.

Please avoid heated arguments and never feed the trolls.

Now to the matter at hand...

So, I'm seeing a couple of threads every couple of hours since the official response from CD Projekt arrived regarding the "nudity bug". It isn't a bug as you can read here: Official response. All threads seem to be getting closed (don't close this one too, guys, please?), so I decided to open another but with a different tone. A suggestion, a petition.

What follows comes from a mature person that has a healthy relationship for years, so take it with moderation and not as a rant.

We have a mature game in our hands, filled with graphic violence, drugs, alcohol and sex. And yet, we can't take a shower naked and we can't look at our own junk while walking around naked in our own apartment. We can't take naked photos either.

Sure, okay, I can live with being forced to wear underwear once I leave my house, or even auto-equipping my last used gear once I leave my house, that would be fine. But omg... it's just so ridiculous that you allowed us to customize our characters at such sexual level only to see them spinning in our inventory! It's a non-sense, seriously.

This isn't a game breaking mechanic for me, but it sure is immersion breaking. After a certain mission, you wake up dizzy in the shower, looking at the floor and you see yourself wearing trunks (if male V), this totally broke the immersion for me. Up until this moment, I didn't really care that I wasn't able to see my dick when naked. Is not the necesity to see my own junk, it's the fact that a person doesn't get into the shower wearing underwear... and I'm sure you agree with this but you were forced to reduce the nudity during gameplay. There's no other explanation.

The combination of all of this with the fact that you promised the game would feature full nudity without any kind of censorship just really confuses me.

If consoles can't have it, fine, but my dudes.... you own your own platform... GOG and Steam is totally okay with nudity nowadays and adult games...

You made an inclusive game in which you can play as trans people, your NPC's dress like whatever they want, there seems to be no kind of inhibition or censorship, and yet and I can't... look at my own naked body....

Snif

Edit: I want add another matter to the discussion. The prostitutes.

Why are there only two NPC's you can interact with to initiate sex? Isn't the whole city cramped with prostitutes or what? I don't really understand it.

For me the reason is more than obvious: censorship again. When you put ONLY two NPC's that you can interact with, far away from the main story and 1st moments of the game, you "hide" those NPC's.

Imagine if you were able to hook up with any prostitute during your first visit to Viktor's (main plot progression). That street is filled with prostitutes, yet you can't really have sex with anyone. Why? These prostitutes don't really act any different than the two that you can interact with, (the ones that are far away, hidden from main story) they would invite you to their place and that's it.

I'm 100% sure the original idea was for you to be able to initiate sex with any prostitute <is prostitute=true> and allow players to interact with them. Not so hard... and VERY easy to censor.

Edit 2: I want to start adding some of the corcerns expressed in this thread for easy access for the devs, if you want yours to be added, sent me a PM.

Dear CD Project
Since you declared that the underwear "during exploration" is intended I have been pretty concerned, not only because it makes no sense, but also because the message you are trying to give as an enterprise is unacceptable. There is no censorship for other characters during sex scenes, but there is censorship everywhere else, which conveys a message of nudity being only sexual. This goes against the inclusivity, the freedom of expression and the "transhumanism" you said before release you were wanting to promote. Being naked during sex but not during showers, times alone and doing non sexual things is outrageous for these exact reasons.
Furthermore, I don't really think this is intended as at first release the game included nudity "during exploration", which was immediately patched. Additionally, before the release you promised the game would have nudity. The unused genitalia creation and breast creation (which doesn't change anything as breasts are resized with clothing) gives evidence that nudity was going to be another feature. Nobody realizes after releasing a game that they "forgot" to put underwear to the main character. You can't change your mind about the final product's characteristics after selling it. Also it makes no sense that the character looks different in the inventory than in the actual exploration section; I have played many games and in none of those have I seen this happening.
I sincerely hope you keep your word and revendicate your convictions.
Best wishes,
Felipe

The game is sold for 18+ people. So censor of any kind about nudity is absolutely ridiculous considering the fact i can literally rip someones head off with my mantis blades or the fact i can rocket launcher them to spread their insides across the floor.
Also on many side quests you can find corpses of people who look like someone gutted them alive and ripped their insides out for you to view with no amount of censoring anything. But nudity is where we draw the line?

It just doesn't make any sense.

[...]

PLEASE give us our freedom that so clearly already exists in the game.

Upon first getting back to V's apartment, the very first time, I went into my cache, organized and checked a few new things out, and proceeded to undress to take a shower. I felt immersed. I was having a blast. And then.. The underwear.
I knew it'd be there, I just really couldn't soften the blow though.

That's when I paused and came to see if I'm the only one, and I'm far from alone, obviously.

This game needs tender, loving care. Removing features that were so obviously already there feels similar to locking the game up in a basement like that dude in the beginning of Breaking Bad.

I will say - I followed instructions I saw in a few posts and rapidly swapped pants, which DID glitch the game and remove the underwear.
I took my FULLY-IMMERSED, Naked shower, glitched the undies BACK on, and laid down for the night to proceed the game. [...]

I'm coming from bathing nude in my last two games I've played (Death Stranding and Ghost of Tsushima), who would've known Cyberpunk was going to the game where I'd do it with shorts. LOL

I agree with the OP. Also what bothers me is that you wouldn't even know it was intended if you didn't go to the official forums or reddit. That's wild to me, let alone a lack of real reason. Left everyone confused with a like it's all good or something.

Haha okay I'm nitpicking, so back to being serious.

The other thing is, so all these hours put into genital customization, couldn't have then went into making the character creation more in depth, maybe individual selection for tattoos, piercings, and etc. Hell there isn't even a zoom in and out feature when you first customize your character(I'm gonna guess because of the genitals). It's just mindboggling really. I also share the same gripes on the other missing features that were falsely advertised as something way more in depth, yet that's for another thread.

Nudity is not what I care about, the sentiment is what bothers me for the most part, I would've bought this game if I wasn't able to customize my genitals, yet if you going to have it in the game and market it, insinuating that the game will have more use for it, then keep that same energy. I don't and can't blame other people for being upset about this.

Disabling the nudity filter should do what it says... not much else to add there.

I seriously love this game and been enjoying every moment, but this decision to only have fully nude in the inventory screen, in my opinion has zero good reason for it. Absolutely zero good reasons.

There is zero logic for being fully nude in the inventory screen and not in photomode, first person, mirror or the shower. Specially the shower, is V really Tobias Funke?

Jokes aside. Just like Bethesda when they did their decision that all mods are cheats, and disables achievements, that mods have to come to the rescue for an unreasonable decision.

So mods once again will have to come to this rescue, unless decisions are turned around.

If the devs or management or whoever is so concerned about full nudity, then why bother with a censor option toggle? Why have fully nudity in inventory but no where else? Why was there time and effort in adding genitalia and public hair options in the character customization? Its a head scratcher.

If grown adults want to be uncensored, let us.
If we don't want to be uncensored, then we turn it off.

Please, don't give us a half an option. If the decision is never turned around, I guess we will be stuck with mods for the rest of the game's life.

I'm not trying to sound mean, just feedback that I see zero good reasons or logic for the decision. The only official response didn't have a reason. To me it feels of a wrong move.

If I have to mod the game, I'll mod the game. Its just something that shouldn't be needing a mod.

I agree with the OP. Nudity isn't really THAT important for CP2077, but immersion is. To let us design specific details of the genitals during character creation and then cover it up during the rest of the game is kinda strange, in my opinion. I understand that it is a delicate matter when it comes to seriousness; you don't want to encourage people doing silly things with this great piece of art, which CP certainly is, but if you are afraid there, why give it to us in the first place?

I second this. After the first time in my game when i loaded a save the shorts appeared and has been since.

So pretty please revert the change.... it wouldnt even be this big a deal if the game wasnt advertised as such and we didnt have customization for our private parts, the fact that we do makes this censoring completely nonsensical.

What are we supposed to do? admire our penises in the inventory screen? are you for real...

If you absolutely have to censor it for consoles then do it, but let PC have uncensored... other games have done console specific changes too so why not this.

I also want the mature content that was advertised and later censored.

I agree with this sentiment 100%. Not only nudity, but lewdness and outright porn is a far more important aspect of the Cyberpunk fiction than it is in for example the Witcher. We don't see it much in tabletop because of the format, but when you have a visual one like in CP2077 the world lacks some very essential grittiness.

Personally I like not having anything arousing in my games. It's just a distraction from why I've sat down to game in the first place. But CP2077 without it feels toothless and half-hearted. It makes the game far less than it would be otherwise. Nudity and in-your-face porn is easily worth the discomfort in this case.

It shouldn't be made to arouse tho. It should be made to discomfort and disgust. CP2077 should even showcase ppl who've replaced they sexual organs with cybernetic prosthesis' for "enhanced pleasure", and other things that would nausiate us to even consider in real life.

I really hope CDPR will reconsider.

This 100x. The censorship makes no sense in an adult game.

And this:

"Badowski said that in the final game, his team intends to have full nudity, not for shock value but because it supports one of the most important themes in the cyberpunk genre: transhumanism, the belief that humanity can transcend its current mental and physical form with the help of technology."

Right now it looks like a shadow of the city where nowadays ethics have been thrown out of the window.

What a let down.

I'm sure that it's already been mentioned, but 27 pages of posts is a slog to read through so I'll just toss in my two cents.
I play the game on XSX, and the character is nude in the inventory view, and there are cutscenes with (at least) female nudity. It doesn't make sense to me that our character is forced to wear underwear in their apartment etc.
I hope this will be reconsidered for a future patch of the game where forced underwear is governed by the censor filter that is togglable in the settings.

This is also such a minor thing that should be easily changed and would scratch one of the complaints of the current list

+1 for bringing back what's promised - an game for adults. Point. Is this night city or some 12 year old anime fantasy of a dark kinky town? The advertisement literally all around is sex sells and you can't see your penis or a vagina? Strippers with clothes? Foot fetish should be hardcore kink? Come on. We are living not in the dark ages where you can't see talk or live the dream of living how you want. And it's a game with a 18 plus rating. If you are afraid that underage could see this than go sue their parents which are responsible first place for checking things before buying it. I got a child myself and filter what he is allowed to see until he is old enough to make his own decisions. Never would blame someone else for the parenting I have to do. And for me.. Well I think I saw enough hard sh#t to deserve an adult game. Projekt Red for me, if it's true you patched the game to be more vanilla and less adult - shame on you. And when you did it sneaky double shame on you and I will never buy or pre-order a game with your name again. Point. Maybe I am just one guy but maybe there are enough that you recognize and reconsider to change that direction asap. And when not I hope you guys would never get the chance again to trick again someone. (yes after reading all sites here I feel tricked into buying an adult game which isn't in my opinion.) sry for my bad English as it isn't my native language. Sincerely

+1 to remove censorship

I personally question the design decision to force underwear onto a player that has the Nudity Filter turned OFF, because it truly has no reasonable explanation whatsoever to justify it. To me it's not about seeing a naked body, whether ingame or movie, but about the principle of the matter. It's about not letting someone else decide what I can or cannot see, hear or know.

- The game is advertised as Mature
- The game has a Nudity Filter specifically made for players to choose what they want to see
- The game allows the player to customize V's genitalia and examine it in all its glory with all its customization options
- The game shows you the genitalia at the very customization screen
- The game shows you the genitalia in the inventory screen
- There is a naked woman and a man in the very first mission
- Female V can see her breasts in first person
- There is sex in the game

So there is absolutely no reasonable explanation that can explain why the game is forcing underwear in first person, when everywhere else it is showing genitalia completely normal. It breaks immersion, it breaks roleplay and makes no sense whatsoever. The fact that so many people reported this as a bug shows just how questionable this decision really is and how nobody agrees with it.

I hope they listen to the community and make the reasonable decision. Nudity Filter is there for a reason obviously, so let us use it how we see fit.

View attachment 11095706
THIS. NOT. FINE!

Would anyone go to a strip club like this?

I'll be honest, I wouldn't care one bit if it wasn't for the fact that you guys advertised it as having it and the fact that you allow me to customize the genitals and pubes so much. I feel lied to and betrayed by a company I love and thought actually cared about their customers, but censoring the game with the day one patch says that you're no different than any other money hungry corporation.

I think I speak for most of the people that are upset when I say that I feel lied to.

Edit 3: I believe these are enough samples, put together in just one day, and the list goes on and on. Your fans are concerned and not happy. I know you can deliver, you always did in the past. Don't let the corpo shits get away with it, chumbas.

 

[Zeliret]

I can see that all children are disappearing from the photo mode so it must not be the reason for the censorship. Must be another one. Even if they do not plan to allow nudity, I really want to know reasons, just so curious. Because we can see genitals on the character screen (xbox), I doubt that it is because some PEGI or some XBOX restrictions.

 

[Applegamerz]

This censorship are the result of the backlash from individuals that can not even spell FUN!

Nudity are of no interest to the SJWs, they even have their own "public relations" fully clothed
However no other peson should enjoy themselves even if its fiction nor a game.

Thats why i created a man-gina! No one should tell me what to do in a game!

So i wonder. those with the game released on disc, does this censorship come before or after the patch?

 

[gungrave1337]

CensoredPunk2077