Kudos to those here that have demonstrated some reason in their arguments.For fans of particular software, this release date thing can be very frustrating. However, the world, small though it may have become through technology, is still a large place, and there are differences between areas. When you, as the maker of a product, have to deal with other companies to get that product out, you are basically at their mercy as to when that will happen.It was said here that sometimes software release dates are the dates it actually appears on shelves, while other times it refers to the 'ship date'. All software I have ever tried to buy at a local retailer here on the USA West Coast has been a victim of the ship date versus the actual shelf date; in addition, often the retailer does have the product on the advertised release date, but 'warehoused' ( still in the packing boxes in a stock room ) but will not actually have it on the shelf for sale for several days. It depends on the retailer, it depends on the market they are in, and it depends on what they already have on shelves that may or may not be selling well.What I am trying to say is that one should not blame the developer; they have no control over these decisions, there are just too many other companies involved in the distributing process. This includes the principles at the point of purchase, which can vary from market to market. For example, yesterday I checked the Gamestop web site; they list the EE as available to order online, with shipping within 24 hours. But entering my zip code showed no stores within 100 miles of having the EE in stock. From this, I can speculate the following ( and it is just speculation ):1. Gamestop has the EE in their main distribution warehouse, ready to ship to buyers.2. They either (a) have already shipped to stores but the stores have not yet 'stocked' it, or (b) they are in the process of shipping it to the stores.That has notihng to do with the developer. Only a developer who has the ability to both publish and distribute their own product can be 100% accurate on the date the product will be available. And in those cases, if you want to go directly to their offices, I am sure they'd be happy to sell it to you that day. One other note, about the patch to bring this up to the EE; for one, it is free to exisitng owners. If you think about it, you can see why the release dates must be met before the patch can be made available. The EE is being released as a 'complete' product, with some added physical bonuses. With two release dates three days apart, why would any retailer even carry the EE if, on the 16th, any owner of the original release can bring that copy up to the EE? All one would have to do is go out the week before, buy the original ( probably online, or in a bargain bin, negating any benefit to the developer ), and wait for the 16th. That would drastically affect sales of the EE when it hit the shelves, so, why carry it? Then, all the extra goodies that current fans would like to get and want to purchase the EE to have would not be available, except by individual purchase. It is strictly a marketing decision, and the developers are at the mercy of the marketing policies of those who distribute their product.There is a lot more that goes on behind the scenes of these actions, all legalese and marketing gobbledygook, but I try to keep all that in mind. Is it frustrating? Sure....but it is both frustrating to the fans and to the developer who has given us a product that we have become fans of. As for the censorship -- I own both the NA original and the UK Import original, though I registered only the import, and it is the version I play ( now in my I-Lost-Count-Of-The-Number replay ) but I can say there is not a LOT of difference between the two. The rating system here in the U.S. is a odd one, and often makes no sense whatever, but it is treated as Gospel by retailers; if you want stores to sell your product, you want the rating that will get that product on the most shelves. The fact that a 'heavier' rating might actually outsell a lighter rating is actually a moot point, as people with common sense are not consulted in these decisions, and those responsible for ratings expect that to happen, as it proves to them that we the gamers are all evil deep inside and of course we will 'give in to temptation'. Thus, it is their sworn duty to remove that temptation, and any retailer courageous enough to ignore it faces a media blitz of negative publicity. Retailers don't like negative publicity; it hurts sales.I hope I haven't rambled so much that my point is lost. That point being, we have a great product already; we are getting a improved version of that product ; it is done, and the time of waiting for news is over. Now the wait begins to actually have it; it is no longer a wait of months but of days, and perhaps hours. I am a impatient person, a vice I have had for all of my 59 years, but I can hold out for a while longer. Hope you can, too.