So, how about that influx of *beep* hype-ers? Seem to be ignoring the forlorn hope
BjornTheBandit;n10254202 said:
Maybe for the best...
Joking, joking.I think they're mostly sticking to the "Active" threads. Stuff discussing gameplay, and the idea thread, etc. Actually seen quite a few interesting concepts in there since the *beep*, so pretty happy about that. Hoping CDPR is still taking new ideas, as long as it doesn't come at the cost of a great core game.
Suhiira kofeiiniturpa
Going to pick up a Baldur's Gate game and give it a go. Would you recommend the EE of 1 or 2? Are they a continuous story, did 2 add on to the gameplay in a meaningful enough way that it's clearly the "better" of the two? Thanks in advance.
Last edited:
The grizzled old fellow with the Veteran cap walks into the club, orders himself the nastiest grease bomb burger the place has and a beer. The young fellow, his nephew, asks him: "Uncle, what is your philosophy of life?" The greying oldster says: " Rather than tell you, I'll let this song explain it." To which, he takes a crumpled E-Buck puts it in the battered VR Jukebox and plays the following selection: https://youtu.be/XpbhgSXZHGQ
Last edited:
I hope in CP2077 we will not hear and/or read something like "the target sustained negative damage", like I heard in other games. In those games it is used when the attacker missed the target.
I find the expression funny and unfit, it makes me think that negative damage means the target got healed.
I am sorry if what I said is offending, it was not my intention to insult.
I find the expression funny and unfit, it makes me think that negative damage means the target got healed.
I am sorry if what I said is offending, it was not my intention to insult.
Definitely go with the "Enhanced Edition", it's not just additional gameplay but additional content in terms of items and classes/skills/feats/etc.Snowflakez;n10254432 said:
As to 1 or 2 ... whichever is most current. I got my current copy of Steam for simplicitys sake.
Suhiira;n10272792 said:
Started playing it last night. Enjoying it so far. :cheers:
spla200;n10292732 said:
They don't do anything. It's just like giving somebody a virtual cookie if you agree with them/find their post funny or helpful/etc.
spla200;n10292732 said:
Redpoints are like dislike buttons. Come on, did you really think that the people who made this forum would do something useless?
Lisbeth_Salander;n10295502 said:
i think you'll find it's simply been stickied. still annoying as fuck each time i come back here and find someone has moved everyone's shit for no discernible reason...
I post in closed threads. Netrunners are real. Wooooo.Lisbeth_Salander;n10295502 said:
eraser7278;n10300962 said:
Sard probably has his reasons.
That said -- a bit of mod feedback -- with how comparatively inactive this forum is compared to others, it doesn't really make much sense to merge threads all the time. It's not like there's a real need for it. If it keeps the conversation alive at this stage, I'd recommend letting that sort of stuff slide.
Merging threads confuses the conversation and it's extremely disorienting, especially in some circumstances where both threads could stand on their own. If someone wants to talk about the combat and someone else talks about a specific aspect of combat, two totally different discussions could be going on. When they get merged, suddenly everything is thrown off.
Just my 2 cents, though.
Some of it is our job to prevent duplicate threads. Some of it is trying to make sure good stuff doesn't vanish but can be found in a live thread.
Sometimes we screw up.
Sometimes the forum goes buggy and eats stuff.
Nearly always there is a redirect when a thread gets moved and it lasts for hours. I can set up a 24 hour redirect in future though.
Sometimes we screw up.
Sometimes the forum goes buggy and eats stuff.
Nearly always there is a redirect when a thread gets moved and it lasts for hours. I can set up a 24 hour redirect in future though.