You are absolutely, 100% correct. I agree that this is exactly what will happen and what it will mean, to a significant extent.The main concern I'm seeing expressed here is the same general fear I see pretty much everywhere, including in my own profession: it's going to be used to replace those of us who create value, by learning to mimic our value creating activities, thereby making the privileged few super-wealthy even more privileged and super-wealthy, while sending the rest of us to the day-old soup line in hopes of grabbing a meal.
In this case, it's the AI learning to copy the lighting artwork of people who've spent years developing the techniques, and then by raw superiority in computing cycles, tweak it almost instantly in ways that would take us thousands of hours to do ourselves. And in the process, real creativity dies a slow death, replaced by very pretty caricatures of what that creativity once accomplished.
The thing is, that's already happening on a widespread basis with all the AI generated artwork crap showing up everywhere. It's often superficially beautiful, but with no "soul" if that makes any sense. I don't see DLSS 5, 6, or whatever, either accelerating or delaying that trend that's already an unstoppable force. My complaint with it is that it simply doesn't look good despite having a dedicated top-end card doing the pre-processing on it. It looks fake. Pretty, but fake.
The solution to that is to unmake or legally restrict AI, and there's no way to get reigns on it now.
This is the same thing that happened with the industrial revolution. What used to be millions of people world-wide that were masters of their craft or trade, replaced virtually overnight by machines that could produce functionally equivalent (if inferior) work at vastly decreased time and cost. It destroyed the cottage industry, upended the economy, and left all of those skilled individuals up the creek without an oar or a prayer. The rich got richer...and...
History is about to repeat itself. Again.
_______________
But, this is also a battle that's been over for quite a long while. This needed to be fought more than 5 years ago, when everyone rolled their eyes at people (like you and me, I believe) concerned about AI becoming too prevalent. (We lost. Long, long ago. This moved at internet speed.)
Plus, since the world did not clamp down on it when it had the opportunity, things like AI generated art, deep fakes, and DLSS 5 became inevitable.
Now that the reality is finally coming into focus, it's also not the end of the world. I can remember in the 1990s people arguing that stuff like digital art programs were going to destroy "real" art. It didn't. It simply made more advanced artistic tools more widely available, and there was still plenty of leeway for ingenuity and creativity. That's what will happen here. Yes, sadly, it will come at the cost of what was once a highly artisinal field being relegated to rank-and-file positions.
Except, of course, for the few visionary artists that saw it coming, who are already imagining ways these new tools can accomplish something no one else will ever see coming.
It's not over. It just banked hard left again, and lots of people are going to go over the side.

















