To avoid off-topic in another thread, answering here.
Also, as @Kudos said, many characters in the Lord of The Rings are given minor roles because their background is well explained elsewhere, and they simply aren't given enough room in the book to trace character development and so on.
Actually I was always quite interested in Tolkien's characters, even in secondary ones in the Lord of The Rings, especially if they were intentionally portrayed in mysterious manner. I don't think that such portrayal is intended to reduce reader's interest in the character, it's just the nature of the heroic style. On the contrary, such style actually stimulates looking deeper, beyond the superficial narrative level. That's normal for such type of literature.I guess we'll have to continue to disagree, because I distinguish (and stand by this distinction) between a dramatis persona who is written in a manner that is abstract and not quite realistic, for the purpose of promoting epic themes or stories, and one who is written in a manner that engages the reader in a way that promotes empathy and stimulates the reader's interest in following the personal history of that character.
Also, as @Kudos said, many characters in the Lord of The Rings are given minor roles because their background is well explained elsewhere, and they simply aren't given enough room in the book to trace character development and so on.
Last edited:


