I am in NO way trying to honestly influence your decision...but, I wish I hadn't finished it.
Until something is done about the ending...I don't have a lot of desire to play a second trip through. And that makes me very sad.It has stayed a very solid 83-86% since the first day!
As I remember it was disturbed by the portal set by Avalla.
Yeah, me too. I was hoping that this game was going to be about choices affecting the game, I get that they were trying to get in new players. However, we have been invested in this characters and its upsetting that they are merely background decorations in TW3.I am in NO way trying to honestly influence your decision...but, I wish I hadn't finished it.
Group therapy is good, you can always play the Witcher 2 to see more Triss at least until we get some news or some hintWell, I'm finishing up the content in Novigrad and knowing what's next, decided to come to the therapy group instead
There's a saying in my country, kind of goes like, "if you have nothing positive to say, then don't say anything," so I'll refrain on commenting what I think about all the book fanatics who made the story go this way...
Instead, I'll thank whoever saw that it was more important to give players a choice, sacrificing the narrative in the process... may your voice be heard again...
I thought it was the portal set by Caranthir as they were looking for Avalac'h. The Navigator was screwing up all the other portals. Just my interpretation. But sometimes it is inconsistent. I agree that a stronger portal would require more magical energy but still, sometimes they work exactly how they were intended and other times they don't. I don't care too much about portals, myself. Like Geralt, I prefer the traditional means of travel. You might bump into something interesting on the way.
I don't know. I feel like they won't change the endings. My dissatisfaction with the endings is just the fact that they had to end. Every game has to end eventually. I am more dissatisfied with the stuff that happens during the game. Triss is the biggest source of my disappointment but there are others. The whole final third or so of the game is too rushed. The pacing is uneven. Overall, I am okay with the endings. They just don't feel as rewarding as they could have been because of the few disappointing parts of the game. I ended up with the feeling that there were too many things left hanging in the air with too many major characters. Too many loose ends that didn't tied up. :X
Certainly couldn't hurt
Tweeting it could be a good idea, never know.
I thought it was the portal set by Caranthir as they were looking for Avalac'h. The Navigator was screwing up all the other portals. Just my interpretation. But sometimes it is inconsistent. I agree that a stronger portal would require more magical energy but still, sometimes they work exactly how they were intended and other times they don't. I don't care too much about portals, myself. Like Geralt, I prefer the traditional means of travel. You might bump into something interesting on the way.
I don't know. I feel like they won't change the endings. My dissatisfaction with the endings is just the fact that they had to end. Every game has to end eventually. I am more dissatisfied with the stuff that happens during the game. Triss is the biggest source of my disappointment but there are others. The whole final third or so of the game is too rushed. The pacing is uneven. Overall, I am okay with the endings. They just don't feel as rewarding as they could have been because of the few disappointing parts of the game. I ended up with the feeling that there were too many things left hanging in the air with too many major characters. Too many loose ends that didn't tied up. :X
---------- Updated at 04:40 AM ----------
Certainly couldn't hurt
I tweeted it and so far there seems to gained a few extra in the poll.
Dude, Look at a god damn map, Kovir isn't far away is a part of the northern realms. And Geralt leaving his friends, he does that shit all the time., it is the nature of his profession. And now Ciri has adopted it as well, if you get the witchering ending. They will see each other at times in a tavern, or at the witcher fortress. Just like in the books and the games. Geralt isn't the type who starts weeping because Dandilion isn't holding his hand 24/7.
so far I've used rather simple hashtags like #thewitcher3 #trissmerigold #witcher3wildhunt - but that hastag sound fine, we need to think of hastags if we want to signal boost.Just #moreTriss pls
Agreed, after Koer Morhen it's one big sprint to the end. It completely contradicts the pace leading up to it. My first playthrough I didn't mind, because I was sort of rushing to see the end anyways, but in subsequent playthroughs it is going to bug me and make me want to just not do Act 3 at all.
I think we would all love that kind of interaction with the characters (not just Triss), however this is the Witcher and any interacting has to stay true to what the Witcher is about. I know some people are skeptical about any possible interactions with Triss in future dlc/expansions, but this is CDPR and i would bet on them integrating something into dlc that would at least mention/reference Triss. As others have stated, they do listen to fans and while they haven't yet commented on this thread, i am almost certain they have come across this thread at least a couple of times and whatever their plans are for this game over the next 18 months, they would at least be considering more interactions with characters from this games, so yeah being excited about the possibilities is great and is better than us fans losing hope (especially since the game only just came out).
Yes I agree not just triss but yen and other characters. In the ending dialogue it says that you live with triss or yen but then you don't get to see them or interact with them. This a great company and I'm going to continue to have high hopes for the future with the things they can addI think we would all love that kind of interaction with the characters (not just Triss), however this is the Witcher and any interacting has to stay true to what the Witcher is about. I know some people are skeptical about any possible interactions with Triss in future dlc/expansions, but this is CDPR and i would bet on them integrating something into dlc that would at least mention/reference Triss. As others have stated, they do listen to fans and while they haven't yet commented on this thread, i am almost certain they have come across this thread at least a couple of times and whatever their plans are for this game over the next 18 months, they would at least be considering more interactions with characters from this games, so yeah being excited about the possibilities is great and is better than us fans losing hope (especially since the game only just came out).
Right, I don't understand what is so wrong with Geralt going off on his own, he's been doing that for three games. It just seems like a poor attempt at trying to stack negatives on the Triss choice. Like Geralt is suddenly going to wilt because he isn't under his friends every single day. Also in the Triss ending they keep their doors open for guests all the time and at any hour. In other words, Geralt and Triss have plenty of company in Kovir. Why wouldn't that company also include their closest friends?
Traitor!
Well there's a variety of endings. For me, it's about the journey not the destination. Probably why I'm not too upset about the ending. Games have been letting me down ending-wise for many years. Endings, even happy ones, are bitter-sweet because that means the journey has to come to an end.
I don't know if they will do that. The reason the endgame state is bare is because then the world wouldn't have to react to the ending. I think they said something like there are 33 possible endings. They would need around 33 different dialogues for every major character. For some endings the war ends and for others the war rages. There's just too many variables at play to create a realistic endgame state. I think the expansions will take place sometime in the middle of the game. Leveling them appropriately could be tricky though.
I don't know. This could be something that they would have to spend a decent amount of time on and it probably wouldn't really pay off in any meaningful way. It would just be a kind of distraction and something to kill time. Sorry, but I don't particularly like this idea. :X There's better ways the resources could be utilized. That's just me though.
They have. Of this I am sure. Don't know what they will do about it yet but they definitely have seen it. It's conspicuously one of the only large threads that has yet to receive developer input.
I agree to most of what you said here. The location doesn't bother me. Geralt doesn't need to keep everybody close to him at all times. The simple life seems like it would suit him quite nicely. I also like to imagine that he and Triss occasionally make their way back to the continent. Probably for a variety of reasons. Triss is sent by King Tancred to talk to other other royal peoples. Geralt goes with her. Geralt receives a lucrative or particularly interesting Witcher contract that he wants to pursue for old times sake - it takes him back to Velen. Triss goes with him. After work, they catch up with everybody. Dandelion, Zoltan, Ciri, and yes even Yen from time to time.
It's really quite simple, they can’t end Geralt's story which ends Triss' story with her spewing nothing but "well", "well", "well", if they do it will be very sad. I can’t imagine that they would do that to such a major character in their series. If they never intended her to become such a fan favorite they certainly went about it the wrong way.Yes I agree not just triss but yen and other characters. In the ending dialogue it says that you live with triss or yen but then you don't get to see them or interact with them. This a great company and I'm going to continue to have high hopes for the future with the things they can add
When you say it's over for them do you mean that they will be focusing on yen?
