Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
  • STORY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 THE WITCHER TALES
  • GAMEPLAY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 MODS (THE WITCHER) MODS (THE WITCHER 2) MODS (THE WITCHER 3)
  • TECHNICAL
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 (PC) THE WITCHER 2 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (PC) THE WITCHER 3 (PLAYSTATION) THE WITCHER 3 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (SWITCH)
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
THE WITCHER
THE WITCHER 2
THE WITCHER 3
THE WITCHER TALES
Menu

Register

The Triss content and the inconsistency of our romance's choice

+

The Triss content and the inconsistency of our romance's choice

  • Dissatisfied from the lack of Triss content and want more

    Votes: 1,194 85.3%
  • I don't care at all

    Votes: 40 2.9%
  • There was enough of Triss in the game

    Votes: 128 9.1%
  • I don't like Triss

    Votes: 38 2.7%

  • Total voters
    1,400
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • …

    Go to page

  • 467
Next
First Prev 84 of 467

Go to page

Next Last
E

Eruvadhor

Senior user
#1,661
Jun 3, 2015
@Raptorini

1) So far as we know, it will not. Many of us have explored all the Triss content there is, and there is no indication at this time that there is any *hidden content* per se.

2) There was a dev post in a different thread regarding his personal take, though nothing official. We are patiently awaiting their reply on their own terms. They are very busy and, as history shows, will respond eventually when they have a good answer to the question at hand.
 
M

Madoga

Rookie
#1,662
Jun 3, 2015
Raptorini said:
1-If i upload my save from Witcher 2 to Witcher 3 will this add to game some more dialogue's with Triss?
2-Anyone from CDPR comment this situation with Triss Romance's Choice?
Click to expand...
1. I haven't tried both, but I doubt it.
2. Someone replied in the old thread, nothing substantial though. They are probably waiting until most people have finished the game and/or are discussing it now.

Quick quote:
And I am also relaying information. If that will lead to anything...that remains to be seen. Obviously, the more people voice their opinion (in a constructive manner) about this, the more people here will listen.
Click to expand...
 
S

saricc

Rookie
#1,663
Jun 3, 2015
AdamSnow said:
So now you answer me, really sad man.

We already explained to you enough times why this is not about hating one character or the other, including my last attempt: http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/40694-The-Triss-content-and-the-inconsistency-of-our-romance-s-choice?p=1743815&viewfull=1#post1743815

You just trying to turn this into a fan-boy fight, we might not be able to ban you, but enjoy talking to yourself.
Click to expand...
If I didn't reply to you before it's because your posts were never worth replying to. You started making accusations however, and I guess that's what finally got my attention?

I disagree with the notion that there was much if any inconsistency. I disagree with the people who think that CD Projekt should waste time and resources because they were sad about the lack of dates with Triss. All of my posts have conveyed this. Are they blunt? Sure. That's the only way you can pierce an echo chamber like this one.
 
X

xxggxx

Senior user
#1,664
Jun 3, 2015
AdamSnow said:
1. No that I know of, I had 3 different "world states" in my save folder, loaded each one and they all had the same interactions with Yen and Triss as far as I checked (which is at around the rat-warehouse mission - including checking "the talk")

2. In the other thread, we had some comments from @GingerEffect but nothing concrete

Oh, and welcome! :)
Click to expand...
Yep, in reality, the backup Witcher 2 or its simulation simply involves the appearance or not of the characters of The Witcher 2 in The Witcher 3 ... No dialogues, and no more choice for Triss or Yen.
 
A

AdamSnow

Rookie
#1,665
Jun 3, 2015
xxggxx said:
Yep, in reality, the backup Witcher 2 or its simulation simply involves the appearance or not of the characters of The Witcher 2 in The Witcher 3 ... No dialogues, and no more choice for Triss or Yen.
Click to expand...
To be honest, I wasn't very hopeful it would make a difference. I mean, I would love it if it did. But I kinda knew that The Witcher series is big on choice within the game itself and less about connecting the threads along each previous game like ME
 
K

keryyn

Rookie
#1,666
Jun 3, 2015
Hi all,

First off, i'd like to give credit to the dev teams for bringing a very interesting, and consistent game to life. Was really amazed by how believable the world of Wild Hunt was when i played for the first hours.

That said, a little history: I played The Witcher for like, half an hour. Overwhelmed by a new game based on lore i didn't know anything about with obscure drugs and a really weird combat system, (those red circles around targets brrrrr awful xD), i simply failed to enjoy it and went back to morrowind ...

Then i learned about the Witcher 2 and thought i could give it a go and see how it looked. So i tried it, played it for a few hours, and ... let it go ... Somewhat, combat was still looking weird and i didn't like the overall look of geralts armors. Looked like an armored bard with heavy jackets and sexy hoses ... Besides even in the Witcher III, whores are jesting on me wearing tight trousers ! I hate Late-middle age stuff, makes knights looks like damsels, aaaah, Skelligans, you guys really understand what "Armor" means ...

So basically, not knowing anything about the books either, it was with very little knowledge of the characters and their various interactions that i tried Wild Hunt. This time the quality of landscape, villages, clearings, forests etc was mind-blowing, the combat feel smooth and rewarding. It's more action based, and even though it might feel easier this way, i still think it's the best of the three games as long as you're not some hardcore loremonger witcher fan ... jeez, sometimes by reading on this forum i think i'm on a starwars community board ...

When it comes to the two main girls of Wild Hunt, i couldn't help but notice pretty quick Triss and Yen where completely different in their own way of dealing with what happens around them. And even though i did not play long within the first games, and got to know Triss better, i did immediately picked her as my first choice in Wild Hunt. Triss is nice and good hearted, makes her the perfect match for a rather altruistic witcher.

But when i got more in touch with Yennefer on the various quests involved in the main plot i realized something was completely wrong about Triss. She was supposed to have broke up with Geralt and yet here she is, loving as ever, like nothing happened, like Yennefer had no importance, so long as Geralt keeps using lines that show his own interest for Triss.

I think the possibility of romancing Triss throught constant dialogues and quests alongside her completely killed any form of interest you may find in pursuing Yennefer. Because she is not that easy to understand at first, keeps many things secrets, her plans, her feelings, what she thinks. Triss in Wild Hunt simply undermine the very existence and interest of Yennefer as Geralt's first and supposedly "true" love in his life. Therefore, i would have prefered not meeting Triss at all in Wild Hunt !

Because of some choices i made, i grew frustrated and finally went back to a one week old save in order to do things differently, and i'm excited about how the game will answer to those choices.

So yes, Triss is nice, and it's always cool i guess to meet characters from previous "episodes", but i think the whole point of the game, just like that GingerThing fellow from CDR said, was to introduce Yennefer as Geralt's most logical choice and that ... she needs some love ! Come on, Triss had enough fun already ...
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Sammygm
L

levlev89

Rookie
#1,667
Jun 3, 2015
AdamSnow said:
To be honest, I wasn't very hopeful it would make a difference. I mean, I would love it if it did. But I kinda knew that The Witcher series is big on choice within the game itself and less about connecting the threads along each previous game like ME
Click to expand...
but why they added it in the first place then? the question about Roche or Triss makes no sense at all? Cause the outcome is completely the same.
 
R

Raptorini

Rookie
#1,668
Jun 3, 2015
AdamSnow said:
To be honest, I wasn't very hopeful it would make a difference. I mean, I would love it if it did. But I kinda knew that The Witcher series is big on choice within the game itself and less about connecting the threads along each previous game like M
Click to expand...
And for me this is big mistake from CDPR. Witcher 3 would be so much better with strong connect to W1,W2... but consoles.....
 
T

TheSavagePotato

Rookie
#1,669
Jun 3, 2015
Its obvious that you romanced Yen in your playthrough and not Triss and that is just fine by me(why wouldn't it be)but since you probably didn't romance Triss you can't exactly say that there is no inconsistency with her character.There is and a very big one she goes from being main NPC in Novigrad to a completely insignificant one after that. Don't you agree that since she is one of the main romance options she should get more than just ONE scene with Geralt after her leaving Novigrad?At least you should be able to interact with her because in the current state it feels like she is just another guard who only replies with one sentence or word.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Mad_Lad_Rad
A

AdamSnow

Rookie
#1,670
Jun 3, 2015
levlev89 said:
but why they added it in the first place then? the question about Roche or Triss makes no sense at all? Cause the outcome is completely the same.
Click to expand...
Raptorini said:
And for me this is big mistake from CDPR. Witcher 3 would be so much better with strong connect to W1,W2... but consoles.....
Click to expand...
I completely agree with both of you. I just set my expectation on the regard pretty low, it's the transition from Witcher 1 to Witcher 2 that tipped me off (I think there was just a single line difference when we meet Iorveth but I don't recall it 100% to be honest) , but somehow I was surprised and disappointed about the treatment Triss got.

Should learn for next time!

... Oh wait.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Mad_Lad_Rad
X

xxggxx

Senior user
#1,671
Jun 3, 2015
keryyn said:
Hi all,

First off, i'd like to give credit to the dev teams for bringing a very interesting, and consistent game to life. Was really amazed by how believable the world of Wild Hunt was when i played for the first hours.

That said, a little history: I played The Witcher for like, half an hour. Overwhelmed by a new game based on lore i didn't know anything about with obscure drugs and a really weird combat system, (those red circles around targets brrrrr awful xD), i simply failed to enjoy it and went back to morrowind ...

Then i learned about the Witcher 2 and thought i could give it a go and see how it looked. So i tried it, played it for a few hours, and ... let it go ... Somewhat, combat was still looking weird and i didn't like the overall look of geralts armors. Looked like an armored bard with heavy jackets and sexy hoses ... Besides even in the Witcher III, whores are jesting on me wearing tight trousers ! I hate Late-middle age stuff, makes knights looks like damsels, aaaah, Skelligans, you guys really understand what "Armor" means ...

So basically, not knowing anything about the books either, it was with very little knowledge of the characters and their various interactions that i tried Wild Hunt. This time the quality of landscape, villages, clearings, forests etc was mind-blowing, the combat feel smooth and rewarding. It's more action based, and even though it might feel easier this way, i still think it's the best of the three games as long as you're not some hardcore loremonger witcher fan ... jeez, sometimes by reading on this forum i think i'm on a starwars community board ...

When it comes to the two main girls of Wild Hunt, i couldn't help but notice pretty quick Triss and Yen where completely different in their own way of dealing with what happens around them. And even though i did not play long within the first games, and got to know Triss better, i did immediately picked her as my first choice in Wild Hunt. Triss is nice and good hearted, makes her the perfect match for a rather altruistic witcher.

But when i got more in touch with Yennefer on the various quests involved in the main plot i realized something was completely wrong about Triss. She was supposed to have broke up with Geralt and yet here she is, loving as ever, like nothing happened, like Yennefer had no importance, so long as Geralt keeps using lines that show his own interest for Triss.

I think the possibility of romancing Triss throught constant dialogues and quests alongside her completely killed any form of interest you may find in pursuing Yennefer. Because she is not that easy to understand at first, keeps many things secrets, her plans, her feelings, what she thinks. Triss in Wild Hunt simply undermine the very existence and interest of Yennefer as Geralt's first and supposedly "true" love in his life. Therefore, i would have prefered not meeting Triss at all in Wild Hunt !

Because of some choices i made, i grew frustrated and finally went back to a one week old save in order to do things differently, and i'm excited about how the game will answer to those choices.

So yes, Triss is nice, and it's always cool i guess to meet characters from previous "episodes", but i think the whole point of the game, just like that GingerThing fellow from CDR said, was to introduce Yennefer as Geralt's most logical choice and that ... she needs some love ! Come on, Triss had enough fun already ...
Click to expand...
That's how it feels when someone starts with The Witcher 3 ...
For newcomers, the story turned as if Yennefer is the only choice that logically impose on Geralt and the player. And exactly for the same reason that players of previous games (like me) found most of the dialogue Yen / Triss and the progress totally weird.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: Mad_Lad_Rad and AdamSnow
A

AdamSnow

Rookie
#1,672
Jun 3, 2015
@keryyn let's hope they'll patch it to make a more distinct divide between choosing Yen or Triss because we do agree that Yen deserve love, we just want that Triss would get some too - or at least let us deny being with Yen when we are going for Triss, At the very very least that.
 
K

keryyn

Rookie
#1,673
Jun 3, 2015
Why are you taking for reference that she is a main character in previous games and for a few quests in Novigrad ? Keira Metz i didn't know anything about before playing Wild Hunt, and i still enjoyed the few quests i did with and for her. I'm not longing to have her now as Geralt's choice for example, even though i like her ... My point of view is that of one who has almost no previous experience with the story, hence i don't think Triss to be that important, or that inconsistent.

If i wanted her character to have more consistence with the story, i would want the same for vesemir, Eskel, Lambert, Ciri and many other characters that i did not know anything about ! I would really like to have a lot more interactions with many important character in the game, yet i won't get a lot more than what's already ingame, for now at least. Maybe DLC and other expansions will add content that will satisfy people wanting more love for Triss or Yennefer, or both ... or Dijkstra ... or not ...
 
Last edited: Jun 3, 2015
T

TheSavagePotato

Rookie
#1,674
Jun 3, 2015
keryyn said:
Why are you taking for reference that she is a main character in previous games and for a few quests in Novigrad ? Keira Metz i didn't know anything about before playing Wild Hunt, and i still enjoyed the few quests i did with and for her. I'm not longing to have her now as Geralt's choice for example, even though i like her ... My point of view is that of one who has almost no previous experience with the story, hence i don't think Triss to be that important, or that inconsistent.

If i wanted her character to have more consistence with the story, i would want the same for vesemir, Eskel, Lambert, Ciri and many other characters that i did not know anything about ! I would really like to have a lot more interactions with many important character in the game, yet i won't get a lot more than what's already ingame, for now at least. Maybe DLC and other expansions will add content that will satisfy people wanting more love for Triss or Yennefer, or both ... or Dijkstra ... or not ...
Click to expand...
Because she is a love interest and they are supposed to affect the coming events differently or at least to interact with Geralt a bit more.
 
A

arkandias

Rookie
#1,675
Jun 3, 2015
keryyn said:
So yes, Triss is nice, and it's always cool i guess to meet characters from previous "episodes", but i think the whole point of the game, just like that GingerThing fellow from CDR said, was to introduce Yennefer as Geralt's most logical choice and that ... she needs some love ! Come on, Triss had enough fun already ...
Click to expand...
No one here (at least not me :) ) is denying the fact that Yen is the most "logical" romance considering the books, considering the story, and considering this is the last episode of the saga. All I'm asking is that AT LEAST I have the choice to romance Triss if I want, without feeling the game become completely broken and inconsistent. I fully understand that the Yen romance get more scenes, more screen time, more dialogues, ... I don't care much about that. I just want a conclusion to the Triss romance, and a good conclusion, not a "Well ?" and not plotholes created.
Personnally I don't necessary want more triss screen exposure (although that would be nice) I just want a logical conclusion.
Take the example of Mass Effect. Liara is the most logical romance, the game does pratically everything to make you romance her. If you romance her, you get more scenes with her, more dialogues than with any other romances, ALTHOUGH you do not feel betrayded by the game if you do not romance her, and the fact that you romance another person do not create mistake and plotholes, and broken dialogues and scenes;

That's all I'm asking.
 
L

levlev89

Rookie
#1,676
Jun 3, 2015
keryyn said:
Why are you taking for reference that she is a main character in previous games and for a few quests in Novigrad ? Keira Metz i didn't know anything about before playing Wild Hunt, and i still enjoyed the few quests i did with and for her. I'm not longing to have her now as Geralt's choice for example, even though i like her ... My point of view is that of one who has almost no previous experience with the story, hence i don't think Triss to be that important, or that inconsistent.

If i wanted her character to have more consistence with the story, i would want the same for vesemir, Eskel, Lambert, Ciri and many other characters that i did not know anything about ! I would really like to have a lot more interactions with many important character in the game, yet i won't get a lot more than what's already ingame, for now at least. Maybe DLC and other expansions will add content that will satisfy people wanting more love for Triss or Yennefer, or both ... or Dijkstra ... or not ...
Click to expand...
The problem for me is the kontext. Vesemir,Eskel,Lambert are extremely nice Character and i would love to see more of them aswell! But Triss is a whole other story. Triss loves Geralt and her secret wish is to spend her life with him. Now in the last game Geralt says finally the L word to Triss. She must be the happiest woman on the planet now right? Hell, they even start planing there retirement in the lighthouse...

But after this honeymoon moment, Triss turned into a brick without feelings, without anything. Just a Person without any soul. Just like a Guard in Novigrad. That makes so sense at all. Its just not understandable.

Edit: Beside the really nice designed "Well? Well? Well?" is the final battle. When Triss walks by and just say "Good Luck". Thats so hilarious, i just sit here and thought "Wow, that was a nice advice, thanks. Maybe we never see each other again, but who cares right?"
 
Last edited: Jun 3, 2015
  • RED Point
Reactions: Mad_Lad_Rad, autopilot_off and AdamSnow
T

Tyrvar

Rookie
#1,677
Jun 3, 2015
keryyn said:
i would have prefered not meeting Triss at all in Wild Hunt !
Click to expand...
HERETIC. BURN HIM FOR THE ETERNAL FIRE.

Wait what?

But seriously, some of these points you have raised surrounding the Triss romance as a whole I can't say I agree with.

keryyn said:
i realized something was completely wrong about Triss. She was supposed to have broke up with Geralt and yet here she is, loving as ever, like nothing happened, like Yennefer had no importance
Click to expand...
According the the games plotline, Triss has been interested in Geralt for a while. I'd find it hard to imagine she'd just stop loving Geralt who is the person she loves at this point. We have to assume after regaining his memory Geralt and her ended things to give the whole Yen+Geralt thing a chance, not to mention the dijin has them bound.

What I do agree with in a sense is,

keryyn said:
the possibility of romancing Triss throught constant dialogues and quests alongside her completely killed any form of interest you may find in pursuing Yennefer. Because she is not that easy to understand at first, keeps many things secrets, her plans, her feelings, what she thinks.
Click to expand...
In my opinion the spacing for content with the romance interests doesn't really work very well, you have nothing/Kiera Metz (same as nothing romance wise) in Velen, Triss in Novigrad, Yen in Skellige and the subsequent events of the main quest line. I believe if we have interactions with Yen and Triss during Velen, some Yen during Novigrad and some Triss during Skellige it would allow for a fair choice of romance interest. Triss has a great headstart in the romance side of things, but it drops off after Novigrad like a lead balloon. Whilst Yen's starts late in Skellige and persists til the "Tedd Deireadh, The Final Age" quest.
 
T

TheSavagePotato

Rookie
#1,678
Jun 3, 2015
levlev89 said:
the problem for me is the kontext. Vesemir,eskel,lambert are extremely nice character and i would love to see more of them aswell! But triss is a whole other story. Triss loves geralt and her secret wish is to spend her life with him. Now in the last game geralt says finally the l word to triss. She must be the happiest woman on the planet now right? Hell, they even start planing there retirement in the lighthouse...

But after this honeymoon moment, triss turned into a brick without feelings, without anything. Just a person without any soul. Just like a guard in novigrad. That makes so sense at all. Its just not understandable.
Click to expand...

exactly
 
A

AdamSnow

Rookie
#1,679
Jun 3, 2015
levlev89 said:
The problem for me is the kontext. Vesemir,Eskel,Lambert are extremely nice Character and i would love to see more of them aswell! But Triss is a whole other story. Triss loves Geralt and her secret wish is to spend her life with him. Now in the last game Geralt says finally the L word to Triss. She must be the happiest woman on the planet now right? Hell, they even start planing there retirement in the lighthouse...

But after this honeymoon moment, Triss turned into a brick without feelings, without anything. Just a Person without any soul. Just like a Guard in Novigrad. That makes so sense at all. Its just not understandable.

Edit: Beside the really nice designed "Well? Well? Well?" is the final battle. When Triss walks by and just say "Good Luck". Thats so hilarious, i just sit here and thought "Wow, that was a nice advice, thanks. Maybe we never see each other again, but who cares right?"
Click to expand...
so true.
 
K

keryyn

Rookie
#1,680
Jun 3, 2015
I see your point. I was also disappointed not to find her at Kaer Mohren. Problem is, the game encourage you too hard at first to renew or get to know a warm red head while the ice queen you get to know much later in the game, like ... real days later if you take time to explore. Thus making Yennefer a secondary character. So in term of balance, you get to quest with Triss in the early parts of the story then you can go and meet Yennefer for good, since the firsty encounters are not really interesting as both are keeping things to themselves until much later in the story.

Still i understand, if you convince Triss to stay, something seems to be missing after you part with her as you really have no clue what she does. Not even notes, letters, or informations from your pals at the Witcher fortress.For the rest i don't know since i haven't been that far into the game yet.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • …

    Go to page

  • 467
Next
First Prev 84 of 467

Go to page

Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.