Yes, Regis is needed more than ever...Group therapist....and put some common sense in Blinky's and Geralt's heads at last.
Yes, Regis is needed more than ever...Group therapist....and put some common sense in Blinky's and Geralt's heads at last.
Maybe though I wouldn't read into it that far. The eurogamer article just mentions a moment where their goals differ, rather than making her a full on villain which would make zero sense. And even if it were true it does not seem likely that Ciri would learn of it while she's visiting worlds, fleeing the hunt or laying unconscious in the Isle of Mists such that her first reaction to her mom after 2 years is one of hesitation. And IIRC, she says one of the reasons she came back is because she wanted to see Geralt and Yennefer again.Maybe I'm overthinking it, but if you look at the deleted "Yennefer betraying the lodge" content, things starts to make more sense. Ciri suspects Yennefer of having some evil plans for her, Eskel warns Geralt about her tricking him, Lambert can't stand her, Dijkstra and Philippa talk about her meddling with politics. Seems to me like all those hints were part of gearing up for big final revelation about Yennefer that was cut in the last moment. It wasn't just some crumpled up paper that someone found in trash bin, that story was in the game, fully voiced, before someone with enough sense pressed the red button.
That might explain Ciri's coldness toward her mother...
If they had done this, she would have been a better antagonist than Eredin himself...
Not sure if the leaked dialogue was legit but i read something in there about Geralt trying to remove the mark he has on his face (as seen in the art work or w/e) and Triss, Yen and Ciri all have conversations with geralt about it.Wouldn't get my hopes up. The leaked dialogue rather indicate that none of them will appear in the dlc.
OK, it seems like you misunderstood me, I was referring to this deleted content:Maybe though I wouldn't read into it that far. The eurogamer article just mentions a moment where their goals differ, rather than making her a full on villain which would make zero sense. And even if it were true it does not seem likely that Ciri would learn of it while she's visiting worlds, fleeing the hunt or laying unconscious in the Isle of Mists such that her first reaction to her mom after 2 years is one of hesitation. And IIRC, she says one of the reasons she came back is because she wanted to see Geralt and Yennefer again.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that in the books there's always been a sense of propriety between them so even though they are close they aren't likely to be all giggly together. But even that rationale's a stretch.
Edit: I also wondered why they wrote Eskel's line about having tricked him before, which is just false.
Man, you're pulling things out of the context really hard. Right before it:Yennefer's cooperation with the Lodge at the end of the book
One night they spent under the open sky, they witcher awakened from a nightmare. It seemed as if he was paralysed and helpless, a great grey owl was clawing at his face and with its sharp hooked beak, trying to peck his eyes out. He awoke. But he was not sure if he had moved from one nightmare to another.Over their encampment poured bright light that startled the horses. In the midst of the brightness a room was visible – a columned hall in a castle. Around a table sat ten figures. Ten women.
He could hear words. Snippets of sentences.
‘...Bring her to us, Yennefer. We command you.’
‘You cannot give me orders. You cannot give orders to her. You don’t have any power over her!’
‘I’m not afraid of them, mother. They cannot do anything. If they wish, I will stand before them.
‘We will meet on June first. At the new moon. We command you both to appear. We warn you, we’ll punish any disobedience.’
‘I will come now, Philippa. Let her stay with him. Don’t leave him alone. Just a couple of days. I will come immediately. As a show of good faith. I have vowed, Philippa. Please.’
The light began to throb. The horses snorted , crazed and kicked at the ground.
The witcher awoke. This time for real.
Gotcha, thanks for clearing that up.OK, it seems like you misunderstood me, I was referring to this deleted content:
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/57121-Possible-deleted-content-involving-the-lodge-in-act-3
From their dialogue we can assume that Yennefer made some kind of a deal with Emhyr which helped him to imprison Philippa, Fringilla and Margarita. What would her reward be in this scenario? My best guess - position of court sorceress beside Empress Ciri.
In the current state of the game none of this makes any sense:
Ciri - "Yennefer have plans for me" (mkaaay, what plans?)
Eskel - "She can trick you again, she did it before" (wtf are you talking about?)
Lambert - He hates her like she stole his lunch money
Dijkstra - Yennefer and politics (she never shows any real interest in politics in books or game)
Philippa - Yennefer as Ciri's court sorceress (again, never mentioned in the books nor game that she wants such life for Ciri or herself)
All of that would make sense if you add that deleted content. Their words could be interpreted as giving hints to the player that she should not be trusted, and they would have been ultimately proved right.
Still, you're right, I'm probably reading it too far, just wanted to make clear what I've meant in the post you quoted.
You've got a point but on the other hand- how does it fit with Yen (if romanced) wanting to leave everything behind to live with Geralt, far away from politics? This dialogue is present no matter what, no matter what ending you got (including the empress ending). It shows you that Yennefer is not interested in any political positions.OK, it seems like you misunderstood me, I was referring to this deleted content:
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/57121-Possible-deleted-content-involving-the-lodge-in-act-3
From their dialogue we can assume that Yennefer made some kind of a deal with Emhyr which helped him to imprison Philippa, Fringilla and Margarita. What would her reward be in this scenario? My best guess - position of court sorceress beside Empress Ciri.
In the current state of the game none of this makes any sense:
Ciri - "Yennefer have plans for me" (mkaaay, what plans?)
Eskel - "She can trick you again, she did it before" (wtf are you talking about?)
Lambert - He hates her like she stole his lunch money
Dijkstra - Yennefer and politics (she never shows any real interest in politics in books or game)
Philippa - Yennefer as Ciri's court sorceress (again, never mentioned in the books nor game that she wants such life for Ciri or herself)
All of that would make sense if you add that deleted content. Their words could be interpreted as giving hints to the player that she should not be trusted, and they would have been ultimately proved right.
Still, you're right, I'm probably reading it too far, just wanted to make clear what I've meant in the post you quoted.
If she can be warm with Geralt, it should be the same with Ciri...the thing is...the game kinda doesn't let her...and that's the point of this threadI think Ciri and Yen really needed their moment together whether it is an argument or a hug fest from the point of Geralt looking in . On the other hand Yen doesn't exhibit much in the line of warmth through out the game . She is driven by trying to find Ciri by any means and that one spot with Ciri and Yen hugging isn't enough to change the demeanor .
Well, like I said, it's just a guess, clearly there's a scene missing between teleportation from Naglfar and this deleted dialogue where it would have been revealed what she got in return. I too believe that they decided late in the development of the game to change Yennefer role in the story, so this leftovers remained. We don't know at what stage were that romance talk written and recorded.You've got a point but on the other hand- how does it fit with Yen (if romanced) wanting to leave everything behind to live with Geralt, far away from politics? This dialogue is present no matter what, no matter what ending you got (including the empress ending). It shows you that Yennefer is not interested in any political positions.
Edit :So even if they brought this scene back into the game, it still wouldn't make sense (the way the story is presented as of now). I think that might have been their 'early' idea about Yen and her role in W3 but then they simply decided to change it - too bad that they forgot to delete/change other things (like those dialogue bits you mention).
Yeah, i went and read the one from the Hearts Of Stone expansion, and Geralt supposedly talks with Ciri.Not sure if the leaked dialogue was legit but i read something in there about Geralt trying to remove the mark he has on his face (as seen in the art work or w/e) and Triss, Yen and Ciri all have conversations with geralt about it.
Here is my old rant file which includes all the suggestions: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0LGfPlWd7bAMkVmcFFnSEdjYzg/viewSo...To keep this thread going let's post some suggestions on how to improvethis messYen-Ciri relationship.Here's thelaziesteasiest way to go:
1)Cut all that crap about "Yennefer's plans" or explain what the hell these plans are.
2)During their reunion at Kaer Morhen Ciri calls Yen "mother".
3)Add some animations here and there.Let them hug before Yen leaves for the final battle,let them smile at each other in some scenes(Kaer Morhen,the boat,the lab).They don't even need to say anything.Actions alone can speak volumes.