The history of closed source is very ideological. Even as a kid I thought so, however, I realized that closed source and DRM are not comparable. Closed source is simply what they do all the games, do not show the source code, is something that, unless you're not a programmer, you should care relatively (and even then I assure you that read the code of others is not to nothing simple), particularly if the software works well (it is not the case with windows XD). Also because using many software I realized that some open source software really deserve (blender, firefox, vlc for example) than their counterparts, but there are too many closed source software that are worth a lot (Pixelmator, Unity3d, quicktime player (at least the the mac version use to record video, screen, and sound in addition to cutting parts of video)). Also OSX is an excellent os (I love the multitouch gesture in particular) and I admit that windows is not so bad (even though it has shortcomings that can not stand, as the multi-desktop missing).
Even linux (especially ubuntu distro) is excellent as an os. But it is one of those programs (gimp, open office) who have some serious fault. For example ubuntu lacks official support that is not the community, canonical does a job pretty rough and install ubuntu on efi can be quite boring. The community is a beautiful thing but it is a safe and solutions that damage can be confusing for a newcomer (I've seen answers that made me white hair, some used the terminal when there was absolutely no need and that clearly newcomers would never have learned). gimp has an option for compassionate, open office is very heavy and did not support the docx (defects that his colleague did not open libre office).
The DRM restricts all, on a content that usually you pay for. It hurts in the first place who paid (and favors those who take the pirated version with no restrictions). It makes all the tedious and often interferes with the content, making even the heaviest viewing. This is not an ideological issue, it is practical.
For the mobile factor in part you are right. But one thing you think (it's a thing that when I had only the desktop computer I continually came back to mind) think the convenience of using the computer for home, wherever you want, if you want to see a movie while you're at dinner you can do, if you want to keep him on his legs on the couch and you can do it even when you're tired but you want to relax lying on the bed you can play a bit.
This convenience, I do not even serve the mobility (which I need), I can not just leave it aside.
Also I have not bought the laptop with the intention of playing. The dedicated graphics card do I need mainly the use of blender.
However, it is clear that at this time the only sector that requires a desktop computer with ultra graphics is videogames industry. This is because video games mainly use the video card and laptop to force things (save battery and stay thin for example) use the mobile versions of video cards. All other operations on computers require more CPU and fast disks (SSD), also take advantage of the most multi-core processors. Even the 3d rendering does not require GPU exaggerated (except in rare extreme cases).In fact, the only real problem is the rendering time, there are not problems such as fps in video games. But with time, and with the improvements in the mobile GPU, gradually also in the field of videogames may no longer need the desktop (just think about the fact that an intel integrated gpu is only a year behind the discrete gpu (also mobile)).
I avoid continuing the off topic that has lasted too much, we've gone from talking about the game to talk about personal preference.
Even linux (especially ubuntu distro) is excellent as an os. But it is one of those programs (gimp, open office) who have some serious fault. For example ubuntu lacks official support that is not the community, canonical does a job pretty rough and install ubuntu on efi can be quite boring. The community is a beautiful thing but it is a safe and solutions that damage can be confusing for a newcomer (I've seen answers that made me white hair, some used the terminal when there was absolutely no need and that clearly newcomers would never have learned). gimp has an option for compassionate, open office is very heavy and did not support the docx (defects that his colleague did not open libre office).
The DRM restricts all, on a content that usually you pay for. It hurts in the first place who paid (and favors those who take the pirated version with no restrictions). It makes all the tedious and often interferes with the content, making even the heaviest viewing. This is not an ideological issue, it is practical.
For the mobile factor in part you are right. But one thing you think (it's a thing that when I had only the desktop computer I continually came back to mind) think the convenience of using the computer for home, wherever you want, if you want to see a movie while you're at dinner you can do, if you want to keep him on his legs on the couch and you can do it even when you're tired but you want to relax lying on the bed you can play a bit.
This convenience, I do not even serve the mobility (which I need), I can not just leave it aside.
Also I have not bought the laptop with the intention of playing. The dedicated graphics card do I need mainly the use of blender.
However, it is clear that at this time the only sector that requires a desktop computer with ultra graphics is videogames industry. This is because video games mainly use the video card and laptop to force things (save battery and stay thin for example) use the mobile versions of video cards. All other operations on computers require more CPU and fast disks (SSD), also take advantage of the most multi-core processors. Even the 3d rendering does not require GPU exaggerated (except in rare extreme cases).In fact, the only real problem is the rendering time, there are not problems such as fps in video games. But with time, and with the improvements in the mobile GPU, gradually also in the field of videogames may no longer need the desktop (just think about the fact that an intel integrated gpu is only a year behind the discrete gpu (also mobile)).
I avoid continuing the off topic that has lasted too much, we've gone from talking about the game to talk about personal preference.
