There is simply more content in Skyrim that there will be in TW3. I wasn't talking about quality here. As I said before, I currently have a 80 hours playthrough of Skyrim pending and I didn't do half of the quests nor the DLCs. It was not my first playthrough: I didn't lose my time in random ("radiant") quests and meaningless exploration.Volsung said:If by more content you mean you can loot chests filled with randomly generated garbage and by NPC backgrounds you mean they took an arrow to the knee then sure, Skyrim has all that. What it doesn't have is cohesion, consistency, acknowledgment of your decisions, good writing... you get the point.
As much as I dislike TW3 being compared to Skyrim, it might draw attention. Question is: will the TES crowd appreciate a game like The Witcher?
For TW3, 80/100 hours of content (probably less for experienced players) in a 44km² game don't look that promising to me. I am worried about empty places (and fast travel).
I'm not glad they already compared the game to another game released three years before TW3 on another generation of platform.
HOWEVER cohesion, consistency, acknowledgment of my decisions, good writing. THAT is appetizing. Why don't they start by that? There is a whole crowd asking for this type of game (look at Project Eternity, Wasteland, Torment).


