Gopher is not a reviewer. Review embargo is on may 12th but reviewers are playing the PC version already.
- Status
Gopher is not a reviewer. Review embargo is on may 12th but reviewers are playing the PC version already.
right, then play that 50x50 meter area that was in that 2 second clip.... im sure you will be happy with everything being 100% scripted and not dynamic in any way.. where you probably cant even interact with anything.
Not yet apparently. German PC magazine is using PS4 for gameplay/story elements of review with 'late in the day' access to PC with the day 1 patch and unlock (but they don't/didn't have that yet.
Sorry, I was thinking about the "ultra" setting of the youtubers play sessions; in any case I doubt that some reviewer will say something of useful about.
I'd expect Digital Foundry on Eurogamer to do that. Their sole job is to tackle graphics and performance.
The downgrade is real :
Oh wait....
That what happen when we compare screen without any idea with setup.
Source of the first image?
The Xbox One demo of the 2014 was scripted too with all the water effects on? You can't confirm that as well I can't confirm that was a genuine ingame session, but the fact is that a videcard don't manage the core script of something such like the AI or scene sequences.
From reports of the streaming (not that I saw it), the AARD water effects are still in.. on XB1 and PS4...
(and most of the others with the possible exception of excessively short blood textures ~ but that could be because of the censored version - and for world wide distribution, I'd expect censored version to be the only one shown pre-launch).
(and most of the others with the possible exception of excessively short blood textures ~ but that could be because of the censored version - and for world wide distribution, I'd expect censored version to be the only one shown pre-launch).
Guys I said before, give a look at the picture forum section:
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/34360-Witcher-3-Screenshots-and-Artwork/page3
A lot of images show a better texture maps, so...
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/34360-Witcher-3-Screenshots-and-Artwork/page3
A lot of images show a better texture maps, so...
Has any reviewer seen the final settings menu yet or said anything about it? Any links?
I believe they said that originally they had a ton of DESTRUCTION, but they toned it down because of performance and clutter. This was like an extremely early piece of info.
I don't believe they ever said anything about toning down the GPU physx effects such as smoke, sparks, and other particles.
That won't affect my enjoyment of the game, it looks good enough and I won't be able to run it at Ultra anyway.
But I do hope CDPR fires their marketing guys after the internet outrage that will occur. Have they not learned from what happened to Ubisoft with Watch Dogs?
I don't care about the downgrade. But their handling of it (or rather lack thereof) has been atrocious.
But I do hope CDPR fires their marketing guys after the internet outrage that will occur. Have they not learned from what happened to Ubisoft with Watch Dogs?
I don't care about the downgrade. But their handling of it (or rather lack thereof) has been atrocious.
The downgrade is real :
Oh wait....
That what happen when we compare screen without any idea with setup.
Aye, and these two images are completely different. First one has foliage and buildings very close to Geralt, and in the second one you can also see Geralt himself, with some plants and trees far away in the background.
These sources always makes me laugh. You can't compare two images that are completely different, it's like comparing an elephant with a car and saying the elephant was downgraded.
Would it be possible to know with what AA setting he played? Asked that a few days ago
:hatsoff:
- Status