Ini files will do nothing to restore removed assets.
---------- Updated at 01:57 PM ----------
Demonstrated in the past? Where''s this demo then? I don't need someone else telling me what to think, I see the difference for myself.
- Status
Ini files will do nothing to restore removed assets.
---------- Updated at 01:57 PM ----------
Demonstrated in the past? Where''s this demo then? I don't need someone else telling me what to think, I see the difference for myself.
Well still the point stands....if you bother dissect the game in search of problems and unpolished things you can basically criticize every game out there. You should really stop searching for the little problems and enjoy the game as it is. It's getting ridiculous....like OMG the fire is not as good as it was!!!
To be honest I would trade anyday some graphical effects for a stable game with consistent fps. Past some point the graphical quality debates are really nitpicking.
When there are already screenshots of the Witcher 2 looking better than the Witcher 3, there's something to think about. But I'm not cancelling due to the game being bad, I'm cancelling due to it not being fully focused on PC first, and due to that, there are plenty of graphical compromises as they stated in that interviw I posted earlier.
Will I play the game and still enjoy it? probably, but will I buy it? no... money is my only possible statement and revolt agasnt their direction, much like I did with Bioware.
---------- Updated at 02:00 PM ----------
Then you should be fine with a console game. The previous witcher games were never like that, and The Witcher 2 was a graphical powerhouse, and praised by many over it, and it wans't stable in terms of fps at all. This one is clearly already not going to be the case, due to consoles.
http://cdn2.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Witcher-3-11.jpg
Just look how gorgous this game looked, what we will get will be not even near the visual porn that CDPR showed us.
Its a totaly diffrent looking game now....
Just look how gorgous this game looked, what we will get will be not even near the visual porn that CDPR showed us.
Its a totaly diffrent looking game now....
So a not-so-open-world game looks better (not my opinion) in some places than an open-world game? What's the problem there??
That pic is from one of the newest builds isn't it?
I don't think you ever properly see NPCs and monsters moving trough grass in the VGX trailer but you might be correct about the debut gameplay trailer.
It does react however in the 35 minute demo and there I also find the foliage to be better lit/shaded compared to what we have been seeing lately.
If you have this attitude you will soon end up playing rock/scissors/paper instead of games. Be more open minded.
That's actually a screenshot that was posted this or last week on the witcher facebook.
Wtf? It looks like the newer builds shown off from the YT previews. Unless I'm not seeing it correctly.
Way to overreact..
Why? because there are no other games out there focused and well developed for PCs? think again
There is a huge difference between these 2 pictures, and not little things one wouldn't notice.
http://i.imgur.com/ROVyp4N.jpg
This screen is like one week old.
just because one guy missed it, and got it wrong, invalidates all the other proof given of downgrades? right right...
god damnit, i wish cdpr would just make a public statement, tell a nice story how the differences happened and that'd be it. wether they lie or tell us the truth wouldn't matter just communicate they should ;P
Wait wait wait wait ...... sorry, I'm not a lover of graphic, but honestly it is true the CD Projekt really disappointed me.
1) As I said I'm not a fan of the graphics, game play even in 1998, because they are epic, but if they are identical versions because delaying three months?
Really why this delay? CD Projekt a negative vote.
2) Why do equal versions? I do not think its right, if a person has a PC of 5,000 € has the right to have a better version than Console, I'm sorry if this article is true, CD Projekt has disappointed me and you can not trust even more of them .
I accepted (always if it is true) if CD Projekt said immediately "You will all versions identical" then defended 100% CD Projekt, but honestly we teased with images "spectacular" and then the result is much worse, this is called teasing consumers.
And they also sent back two months to the end of the game that it was no use, good job, CD Projekt.
In the list of bad guys too.
Totally different lightning, also you dont know what build they use...and mainly you have NO IDEA about graphic settings in those screens.
These are also from 2013 trailer, why aren't downgrade people using them to compare? It is so stupid to think game development won't change in 2 years.
Foliage looks still better than in newest builds (apart from that sharpening effect).. and that character models are looking now better, that knows everyone.. character models aren't the thing why are people screaming about downgrade
I agree with you, My post does not refer to the graphics, I saw that I do not care, but I mean honesty of CD Projekt.
You can not say, for example, "We don't did a downgrade" and then there was actually, this is a mockery to consumers.
I my post is related to that, honesty first.
- Status