LoL! i5 4690k easily can handle with SLI GTX 980. Jesus, what a stupid questions.Another quick question since you seem well informed on this; will my GTX 970 be potentially bottle-necked by the i5 4690k (assume stock)?
LoL! i5 4690k easily can handle with SLI GTX 980. Jesus, what a stupid questions.Another quick question since you seem well informed on this; will my GTX 970 be potentially bottle-necked by the i5 4690k (assume stock)?
We already had that case earlier in the thread. R9 270 X is slightly superior to HD 7870 (~ 10% faster). The minimum reqs themselves are a little above PS4 hardware levels. So with some tweaking you should get PS4 graphics and framerates, hopefully.
i have the recommended config all better than it only little fear about my gtx 780 who is near the recommended i think i need to upgrade it to gtx 970 or 980 . i was hoping nvidia card come sooner but gtx 980 ti and better will be pushed in 2016 so ><
Err, nope. The big maxwell with 30-40% speed bump over the gtx 980 is on track for 2015, probably still out before TW3.
LoL! i5 4690k easily can handle with SLI GTX 980. Jesus, what a stupid questions.
LoL! i5 4690k easily can handle with SLI GTX 980. Jesus, what a stupid questions.
LoL! i5 4690k easily can handle with SLI GTX 980. Jesus, what a stupid questions.
Not exactly.. and no need to be rude. The 4690k WILL suffice for TW3, but it also would be the bottleneck for the majority of games for that kind of GPU power provided by GTX 980 sli or other highend multi GPU setups. Not saying you will get bad framerates, they will be excellently playable, still the CPU will limit the frame output.
I believe the R9 270x is = to the 7870, as in the 7870 was basically renamed to the R9 270x, you can even use 1 of each of those cards for Crossfire together.
R9 270x has an upgraded clock setup and faster memory, so it's fractionally faster. But anything a 270x can do, a 7870 GHz can do it too.
Do you think A 750 TI GTX 2 GB is going to hold up?
Screw the PC industry and their expensive devilish engines! I'm done with their imperialism!
On a serious note, I don't mean to screw the fun, but I hope CDP will optimize the game a lil bit for notebook and laptop for example. Or it will mean to exclude a great part of gamers. I think that it's quite demanding, I didn't exactly expect... that much! (even in the min reqs).
Not to mention that nowadays it is more expensive to buy a nice performing PC or v-card than a videogame and not everyone can afford it.
Unless CDP isn't imply that I should join the dark side of the force and... buy a console D:
With those stated requirements, I'm getting a little worried about the 750 and 750Ti. They're 16-ROP (16 processors on the output stage, which do a lot of per-pixel processing) cards when the specified cards are 24-ROP (660) and 32-ROP. They're also short on shaders.
But my stable includes a Core i3 Sandy Bridge with a GTX 750, and I will be among the first to report whether the game is usefully playable on what I think will be a not-too-sub-minimum setup.
I am telling yah those minimums are going to turn out as the high settings, or something ridicules.
---------- Updated at 09:49 PM ----------
God my rig is just a modicum stronger then yours. I am hoping those requirments turn out to be for a very high resolution like 4k
Screw the PC industry and their expensive devilish engines! I'm done with their imperialism!
On a serious note, I don't mean to screw the fun, but I hope CDP will optimize the game a lil bit for notebook and laptop for example. Or it will mean to exclude a great part of gamers. I think that it's quite demanding, I didn't exactly expect... that much! (even in the min reqs).
Not to mention that nowadays it is more expensive to buy a nice performing PC or v-card than a videogame and not everyone can afford it.
Unless CDP isn't imply that I should join the dark side of the force and... buy a console D:
If I was to build a PC, I'd need to know what I need.
I don't lol.
I'd need a configuration of some sort on how to best maximize £1100 or in your case 2 grand.
I'm inclined to agree. I think the minimum will be what is needed for satisfactory performance at medium to high settings and reduced resolution. I have a much stronger computer but also that one and several other sub-minimum units that should give me a pretty good picture of what the limiting factors are after the game comes out.
- Computer Case
- Motherboard
- Processor
- Power supply
- RAM
- Graphics card
- Harddrive
- Disc drive
- OS
- Mouse and Keyboard
It's not that hard to put together, you just want to go slow doing it your first time. It's definitely a bit nerve-wracking the first time, but once you are done, it's very satisfying and you understand your computer a lot more.
Anyways, there is a thread that goes into more of the finer detail here:
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/32239-Building-a-gaming-PC