Yes architecture wise it's better but speaking purely about capacity don't you think 1.5 GB is little low ? he might face stuttering or other issues due to vram shortage ?
Yes I say medium-high.
Last edited:
Yes architecture wise it's better but speaking purely about capacity don't you think 1.5 GB is little low ? he might face stuttering or other issues due to vram shortage ?
Yes I say medium-high.
what can we expect from i5-2500ks?
I mean,these are as minimum requirements,but is there really a need to upgrade for something more powerful?
because except for cpus like i7 4790k I don't really see what can be way more powerful than a 2500k...
I mean,these are as minimum requirements,but is there really a need to upgrade for something more powerful?
because except for cpus like i7 4790k I don't really see what can be way more powerful than a 2500k...
As someone told me earlier: With a quad core i5 25k just expect a few less frames. It is still a good CPU for gaming.
I think it will come down to how good your GPU is more than anything.
I have two 780 so gpu isn't a real problem
actually am a little bit more concerned about the system requirement they released,and why is there a 2500k for intel and a amd phenom x4 940...
I thought the x4 940 less powerful than an i5 2500k
how well can i expect to run this
i dont meet recommend spec with my CPU .how important will this factor be if i want to play this game at ultra at 1080p? i will be upgrading my GPU most prob to a Titan X
CPU: i5 3570k
cooler: H100
MB: asus sabertooth z77
GPU: 7970 vapor x 3gig
Ram: 8x8 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance
HD 1: Samsung 840evo(Windows 7 64bit)
HD 2: WDCB 1T
PSU: Corsair HX1000
i dont meet recommend spec with my CPU .how important will this factor be if i want to play this game at ultra at 1080p? i will be upgrading my GPU most prob to a Titan X
CPU: i5 3570k
cooler: H100
MB: asus sabertooth z77
GPU: 7970 vapor x 3gig
Ram: 8x8 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance
HD 1: Samsung 840evo(Windows 7 64bit)
HD 2: WDCB 1T
PSU: Corsair HX1000
I think you'll be fine. The 3570K is an excellent CPU
nice nice titan x it is then
The titan X is an amazing card and if you have the budget for it then it's all good but i believe that a Gtx 980 will be more than enough to run this on ultra and in the process save a LOT of money. Just a thought.
the 980 only has 4gbs of vram. titan x has 12. a heavly moded skyirm with texture packs can easyly go over that mark or even 6gb for that matter. and the more demanding requierment of vram so 12gb of vram is well worth it and a better investment then a 980. otherwise i would of got that card last year..but instead i waited and i think the wait is over. there is the 980ti coming out later this year but that is only 6gb and its a cut down of the titan x.i think the only advantage would be after market cooling..but with a little modding you can do that with the titan x. its allready been said. but to be honest il just settle with the standerd cooling. its not like it would need overclocking anytime soon to max games out. the card is a beast.
Last edited:
Well yes, if you're into played modded games and stuff like that then Titan X is a good choice. Enjoy it and also, i'm a little bit jealous
I believe it does not. The deal, at least where i live, only goes for the 970 and the 980.
---------- Updated at 05:22 PM ----------
The cpu should be fine and the rest of the system looks ok to run the game. We can only speculate as always but my guess is that at 1366x768 resolution, you could probably pull off a combination of medium+high with pretty decent fps.
The system looks fine although i am not so sure about that 650Ti. My guess is like the above, combination of medium+high with decent fps.
I have two 780 so gpu isn't a real problem
actually am a little bit more concerned about the system requirement they released,and why is there a 2500k for intel and a amd phenom x4 940...
I thought the x4 940 less powerful than an i5 2500k
Yeah the x4 940 is less powerful in all categories which is one of the reasons that I question the requirements. Since they have finished optimization(or close to it) then i'd expect the requirements to be less now than what they showed back in January.
Personally I am making assumptions on what my system can do. I can run the Witcher 2 on ultra, plus ubersampling, with a MSI Lightning Radeon R9 290x and a i5 25k with no problems so I assume that I can play Witcher 3 on mostly very high settings with a little bit of ultra thrown in.
So, Finally I am going for this one, thanks for the tips
http://www.appinformatica.com/tarjetas-graficas-gigabyte-gtx970g1-gaming-4gd-1.0.php
and thinking about this one
http://www.appinformatica.com/tarjetas-graficas-msi-vga-nvidia-gtx-970-gaming-4gb-ddr5.php
12 Gb ram and a i5 2500,
I hope for 30fps on High/ultra mix
Is that good?
salute
http://www.appinformatica.com/tarjetas-graficas-gigabyte-gtx970g1-gaming-4gd-1.0.php
and thinking about this one
http://www.appinformatica.com/tarjetas-graficas-msi-vga-nvidia-gtx-970-gaming-4gb-ddr5.php
12 Gb ram and a i5 2500,
I hope for 30fps on High/ultra mix
Is that good?
salute
The i5-2500K is a very good CPU and even though stated as minimum, it has insane overclocking capabilities if you are into that.
12 gigs of RAM are enough so you're good there.
I'd go for the Gigabyte G1. It is said that it's the best gtx 970 in the market currently.
With these 3 i am sure you'll pull more than 30fps
Thanks , So the Gygabite one, I do not own the K version, the normal one, and I am not very good in overcloking, Will I get the 30 fps on High/ultra without overclocking? (1920x1080)