Based on the date of the retraction (one day after the statement that it would be the last game), I'd say that they never intended to convey the notion that it was the last game. At most, maybe Bedowski got confused, and the other executives immediately went, "Are you crazy? No way are we ending this franchise. Look at the revenue numbers". More likely, he really did mean that it was just the end of Geralt's story.Thanks for quoting. Seems they began back tracking earlier than I remember - but the feeling was very much "this is the last Witcher game". We all knew it wasn't but it seemed there needed to be a VERY compelling reason for them to return to the franchise. Its okay for things to have an end - let them go out on a high and all that.
Either way, I can't imagine anybody ever convincing me that TW3 didn't end with a set-up specifically for a planned TW4.
Edit: correction about my not-so-witty reference to revenue numbers. The article was in 2013, lol. They probably had projections, but that's all.


