Heh. Here I haven't been on this forum for ages, I come back and it's pure chaos.

Was going to write in the hunt thread, but that one is so long already so I figured it'd be better to write here.First of all, if any developers read this, I love the game and I bought it 3 times. English version, polish version and EE.Now if that isn't supporting your company, I don't know what is. I also know that a lot of other people have bought the game several times as well.Now that that's out of the way, on to the console version of the Witcher.You guys did a mistake with the whole hunt thing. It's almost painful to read through the thread now that we know it was only a port.I mean you must be wincing looking at how happy and excited people were and then they reeled back when being slapped in the face with a console port.Especially at the end when a lot of people were repeating how we didn't know yet, how we should wait and see as if that could change what was coming.Ok, sounding very negative here, but it was really a bad move. Making the breaking wall Blizzard style as if to announce some great revelation, telling us to wait and see while the leak made us think that you wouldn't announce an already announced port.To lighten it up a bit, I really don't mind a console version. Maybe that will make western mature RPGs more popular on the consoles, I don't know.I own a PS2 and PS3 in addition to my gaming machine (and a DS and of course a variety of old gaming platforms but I don't know if that counts), and I have nothing against more people getting to play a game.But you can't just dismiss your purely PC fanbases' concerns, because there are too many examples of the PC platform being left behind as developers move over to consoles, "dumbing down" the game at the same time.And you say how you only have one site on which to announce the game on. Well, if you had just announced it, I don't think anyone would have minded, yet you just had to get everyone excited with a game. Things like that are usually reserved for big announcments after all.And then you have the problem with how the console version is presented as superior to the PC version.You even have websites that makes it sound as if you hate PC gamers and are abandoning the PC platform for good. You must have given those people some way to twist your words, and I think the way you present the console version is giving them that option.Yes, consoles are different, yet a completely new fighting system and new animations aren't needed to make the game run on a console from what I know.The game didn't really utilize the mouse and keyboard in the first place. I actually think this would have been one of easiest control schemes to port (not saying anything else is easy to port of course).Oh well, just repeating the arguments here in case anyone from the PR department reads. I certainly haven't done any studies or worked with PR, yet I do see that you went wrong here somewhere. There would have been quite a few people complaining about the console version in general of course, even if you had announced it normally. Yet, I do believe that if you hadn't kicked us in the balls (only metaphorically, I don't even have balls) by making a "hunt" and presenting the console version as superior, there would have been a lot less angry fans on the forum.And from yet another female gamer, don't even dare to make a naked Geralt console exclusive. I mean, I didn't mind the whole sexist approach with the cards and Geralt being able to plow over every female in the game, but it would have been nice to see something else than boobs as well. You know; we female gamers aren't all bisexual or lesbian(as some seem to think). When it is warm enough for several female characters to be naked, then it is certainly warm enough for men not to be completely covered in clothes.Oh. Excluding you from most girls here then DIDI510.

Hehe. Get your point, but as I show below developers seems to ignore other things that don't make sense to show some breasts. I'm not that interested in seeing pixels without clothes (the real deal is better after all), but I don't like discrimination.

I guess it would be a little stupid for Geralt to be fightng without armor, but then it also seems a little stupid for Triss to go up against a powerful mage with her breasts falling out. Yeah, I know she uses magic, but even though armour often gives a penalty to spellcasters, there is nothing that says that female spellcasters must have a certain amount of skin showing to be able to cast spells. Anyway, I'm ranting here.

Don't really mind if we didn't get a naked Geralt, just don't make him console exclusive. If we don't get it, they don't get it.Getting late now. Maybe someone will have read this by the morning. But then I am writing from Poland so I guess it's just as late for a lot of people. Once again, I love the game.

Makes me feel bad to write negative posts like this, yet I felt I had to say it.