Not even a single Jutta/Sasha- like sideques
Well, I really wanted the famous library scene with Fringilla
If it's just your friend you cannot say you're in relationship with him. However, if you're really friends (like really fond of each other, not like facebook friends), it can quickly turn into romantic relationship at the right opportunity.Don't know which psychology you study, I'm not a psychologist myself but does that mean my male best friend should have been in a relationship with me?
As an italian I just really feel this phrase. Didn't know it was so... popular.are there just for the bunga bunga
The unicorn is enough.
So where is the romance CDP advertised?
But they never advertised it
We have known each other for 6 years, irl, so no. But better drop this, thread is not dedicated to my personal life, I was just mentioning it as an example that if you think it as "always" doesn't mean it's true.If it's just your friend you cannot say you're in relationship with him. However, if you're really friends (like really fond of each other, not like facebook friends), it can quickly turn into romantic relationship at the right opportunity.
That would have been a copy paste without retcons.I wouldn't like them to copy-paste things from the books. The unicorn is enough.
Not true, in a german video interview they talked about a new romance
Sasha and Jutta played a similar role in the storyline of their respective sidequests as Syanna in the storyline of the mainquest. I agree, that they are in the same category, but at least you get thr opportunity to "romance" them in one playthrough, why choosing the unseen path lefts you without any romance during the whole game.I would place Syanna in the exact same category(when it comes to "romance"). But she's also playing a certain role in the expansion's storyline while Jutta/Sasha are there just for the bunga bunga
---------- Zaktualizowano 10:09 ----------
Well, because how were they supposed to call it? A new "sex option"?
What do you mean not counting? And why exactly they don't count? And that's the point that they actually added Syanna, who is no better than a whore, and called it "romance".So show me a female character in B&W to which Geralt feels any sort of emotional attachment (not counting Yennefer or Triss who can visit you at the end).
But they never advertised it, really. That's why I knew that this is not something they paid much attention to.
Unlike with Shani, who was announced long before HoS came out.
added Syanna, who is no better than a whore,
Let's not go that far...
Like I said earlier, she played a role in the main story..comparing her to some random prostitute is... exaggerating, to say the least.
He's correct though, friendship is always a potential romantic interest, but it doesn't mean it will ever become one.We have known each other for 6 years, irl, so no. But better drop this, thread is not dedicated to my personal life, I was just mentioning it as an example that if you think it as "always" doesn't mean it's true.
How is this sentence in the official description of the expansion on the steam and gog.com page "not advertising it"?
"Blood and Wine is a 20+ hour adventure full of dark deeds, unexpected twists, romance and deceit."
I'm saying that her "sex option" is, yes, like random prostitute, just different video, not her actual role in the game.Let's not go that far...
Like I said earlier, she played a role in the main story..comparing her to some random prostitute is... exaggerating, to say the least.
He's correct though, friendship is always a potential romantic interest, but it doesn't mean it will ever become one.