There are soooo few sexual partners in B&W

[jimmywon34]

just in "Blood & Wine":


> dead kids
> vampire drinks the child
> tons of dismembered corpses
> blood, gore, pus and piss
> Geralt has to drink a liquid poo to remove the curse
> bleeding trees
> a castrated statue
etc.


so just "not enough" nudity and coitus turn it all to immature content now? noice

Strawman.

 

[Sephira]

That is why I said the plot should've been entirely different. Not Dettlaff as the antagonist. Not necessarily slaughter of knight errants.

The real antagonist isn't him indeed, I mean for me. But for some reasons he had to be put down as well.

 

[ravenwood007]

That picture of the Duchess' bum is one of the highest-voted BaW-related thread on reddit - and one of the top replies unsurprisingly involves a complaint regarding the lack of opportunity to, say, hit it. Honestly, Geralt's here on a contract and the relationship's purely professional; asking for more and you're getting a regular porn script or a slightly depressing actual workplace story.

I find it seriously ironic - people love The Witcher because it dares drift away from the classic wish-fulfilling formula of your average video game, by essentially telling you that you can't always get what you want. It amazes me how people have come to accept that bad things could happen to everyone and you might be helpless about it, but refuse to accept the fact that they can't sleep with whoever they want, whenever they want, in whatever ways they want.

Plus, it's romance we're talking about - it's something that will steadily build up and culminate in an intimate scene - rather than just the intimate scene, as so many here and elsewhere seem to believe. Yes, realistically you should be able to do whatever you wish upon the basis of mutual consent - and Toussaint is definitely a great place to do it - but it still has to make narrative sense. Apparently the length and scope of the story could only afford the development of one such relationship (remember you have a few murders to investigate and an emotionally unstable force of destruction to deal with) - and even that might not have been enough, which may be why the Syanna storyline feels so rushed, so unfulfilled and so unsatisfying (but it has to be there because, well, CDPR knows their audience I suppose).

 

[Troldierman]

@Sephira Another thing is that she was in Dun Tynne during at least two of the murders. So, was Dettlaff taking a nappy poo the whole time in his toy store the whole time. Explain me this. What happened to his unearthly sensibilities?!

 

[Maerd]

To be honest, the scene with Syanna was good, but even that scene was not necessary. I could live without any sexscenes. If you want one, go in the brothel.

Yep, you just proved my thesis that a lot of people think that sex is bad and only allowed with prostitutes.

---------- Updated at 12:37 AM ----------

Yep, you pretty much summed up the point of view of the female population of this thread.

You should thank the fact that most of the folks here are well educated people, and forums rules of course, because there is a perfect reply for this.

Why so edgy? That post, which I was commenting, was upvoted by every present female participant... you don't like face the facts?

---------- Updated at 12:43 AM ----------

> dead kids
> vampire drinks the child
> tons of dismembered corpses
> blood, gore, pus and piss
> Geralt has to drink a liquid poo to remove the curse
> bleeding trees
> a castrated statue
etc.

so just "not enough" nudity and coitus turn it all to immature content now? noice

Everything listed here has nothing to do with maturity. Maturity is being able to understand consequences and take responsibility for your actions.

---------- Updated at 01:01 AM ----------

I find it seriously ironic - people love The Witcher because it dares drift away from the classic wish-fulfilling formula of your average video game, by essentially telling you that you can't always get what you want.

The Witcher series deviates from classic formula not by telling you that you can't always get what you want but by breaking cliches and introduction of a cynical and harsh fantasy world where "good" characters may have serious flaws and "evil" characters have positive traits, where nothing is strictly black and white and sometimes your choices are trade-offs between two evils.

Apparently the length and scope of the story could only afford the development of one such relationship (remember you have a few murders to investigate and an emotionally unstable force of destruction to deal with) - and even that might not have been enough, which may be why the Syanna storyline feels so rushed, so unfulfilled and so unsatisfying (but it has to be there because, well, CDPR knows their audience I suppose).

Writer could write whatever they want. It was not about "they could not afford" it's about company policy in general, where executives decided to make the game teen friendly to pander wider audience in their opinion (definitely less criticism from moralists).

 

[ravenwood007]

The Witcher series deviates from classic formula not by telling you that you can't always get what you want but by breaking cliches and introduction of a cynical and harsh fantasy world where "good" characters may have serious flaws and "evil" characters have positive traits, where nothing is strictly black and white and sometimes your choices are trade-offs between two evils.

You're correct. Yet still, I would argue what the average player generally wants and expects at the end of a plotline (be it a major one or a minor one) is a resolution favorable to all parties (who deserve it to different degrees), hence the concept of "the good ending" and its alternatives; the series quite often denies the player that option. Grey morality isn't unique to the Witcherverse, but it's better executed here. I believe we're largely on the same page regarding this issue, so there's no point arguing further.

Writer could write whatever they want. It was not about "they could not afford" it's about company policy in general, where executives decided to make the game teen friendly to pander wider audience in their opinion (definitely less criticism from moralists).

Yes, as the series hits it big, the issues of wider appeal, ratings, and the "moralists" you speak of could indeed become of greater concern. However, why would you assume that the "toning down" of the "sex department" was primarily due to a self-censoring effort, rather than as a creative decision?

I understand people in the gaming community are quite wary of having an "agenda" shoved down their throats, hence their reluctant and conditional acceptance of things such as diversity - "as long as it 'works' or 'makes sense'". Couldn't the same case be made about sexuality? Scenes of intimacy are often a respite from a Witcher's hectic life, which should ideally be good, but also create pacing issues - you shouldn't have it too much and too frequently. They would also have to make sense narratively. Most of us have absolutely zero issue with sex scenes - when we do (especially with regards to Syanna), it's hardly from a sex-negative perspective, but rather because it doesn't work - there's limited build-up and hardly any emotional attachment. If that's the case, I'd prefer a run a celibacy. The main game actually handles this reasonably well, so I'm glad I don't have to.

When games are concerned, I'm not in favor of graceless sex for sex's sake. Yes, in reality sex is often graceless, and "for sex's sake" is often why we do it - but this isn't real life and there's a certain rhythm it has to follow. I think the writers were more than aware of that.

 

[RegisTheMan]

Everything listed here has nothing to do with maturity. Maturity is being able to understand consequences and take responsibility for your actions.

Really? Every second quest in B&W is about taking responsibility after it:
Ask the witch nicely to remove the curse or act like an alpha male retard and face the death of an innocent man.
Investigate who's the 5th victim and talk to Syanna or "where's my share, duchess? whoops you're dead".
Tell Guillaume the truth or keep Vivienne's secret.
etc.

And with sex in the witcher mostly the only possible responsibility you take is a feeling of cheating. Just a feeling cause in the game no woman will tell you "How could you do this to me?" Bang as many of them as you want. Yennefer or Triss won't say a word about it. Threesome ending doesn't count simply cause it's not just about sex.
There is no maturity if the players know about no difference between "plough all the possible women or just one", cuz that "only one" doesn't care. Same goes to the previous game. Cucked Cynthia? Or Ves? Relax, Trissy's fine with it.

 

[Maerd]

Really? Every second quest in B&W is about taking responsibility after it:
Ask the witch nicely to remove the curse or act like an alpha male retard and face the death of an innocent man.
Investigate who's the 5th victim and talk to Syanna or "where's my share, duchess? whoops you're dead".
Tell Guillaume the truth or keep Vivienne's secret.

I said your list in your earlier post have nothing to do with maturity. Now you're trying to avoid the point.

As for choices the witch choice has very obvious good an bad option like in Bioware games, but you can even come up with a moral that one must be polite (yeah, who would have guessed). Non-investigating the 5th victim... I bet there was not a single player who didn't go to learn who's the last victim even if for the sake of curiosity. And "where's my share, duchess? whoops you're dead" is not about being mature, it's about being an idiot, it's like being rude to elves in TW2 who're aiming at you from all directions. "The warble..." is a good quest, yes, and nobody's denying that. But all this have nothing to do with your point that since the game has blood, gore and some poo then this must be mature game. Wrong.

And with sex in the witcher mostly the only possible responsibility you take is a feeling of cheating.

Society in general dislike cheating per se because it potentially leads to problems like STDs, unwanted children, and, in case of women, the diversion of resources/money from the family to some third party. Big impact to our view of sex was made by abrahamic religions, which view sex as a sin, as something dirty and shameful. In those religions it is a tool to make people feel a permanent guilt caused by their quite natural desires and therefore be tightly bound to a church, which can "forgive" them for that. In Europe before Christianity spread, views on sex were way more liberal and sex was not something special. It could have been even practiced in public. Here are examples:

"We have courtesans for pleasure, concubines for daily tending of a body, and wives to beget legitimate children and have a trustworthy guardian of our home"
- Apollodorus, Against Neaira (Athenian court speech)

Arabian traveler and historian Ibn Fadlan about Rus vikings (taken from https://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/montgo1.pdf, you can read the full text and educate yourself about how real vikings were like, it's very interesting):

They arrive from their territory (min baladi-him) and moor their boats by the Atil (a large river), building on its banks large wooden houses.
They gather in the one house in their tens and twenties, sometimes more, sometimes less. Each of them has a couch on which he sits. They are accompanied by beautiful slave girls for trading. One man will have intercourse with his slave-girl while his companion looks on. Sometimes a group of them comes together to do this, each in front of the other. Sometimes indeed the merchant will come in to buy a slave-girl from one of them and he will chance upon him having intercourse with her, but <the Rus> will not leave her alone until he has satisfied his urge.

Same source about the funeral of a chieftain (compare it to king Bran's funeral and realize that the witcher world is still a fairy tale fantasy in comparison to medieval realities):

Then they produced a couch and placed it on the ship, covering it with quilts <made of> Byzantine silk brocade and cushions <made of> Byzantine silk brocade. Then a crone arrived whom they called the “Angel of Death” and she spread on the couch the coverings we have mentioned. She is responsible for having his <garments> sewn up and putting him in order and it is she who kills the slave-girls. I myself saw her: a gloomy, corpulent woman, neither young nor old. When they came to his grave, they removed the soil from the wood and then removed the wood, exhuming him <still dressed> in the izar in which he had died. I could see that he had turned black because of the coldness of the ground. They had also placed alcohol, fruit and a pandora (tunbur) beside him in the grave, all of which they took out. Surprisingly, he had not begun to stink and only his colour had deteriorated. They clothed him in trousers, leggings, boots, a qurtaq, and a silk caftan with golden buttons, and placed a silk qalansuwwah <fringed> with sable on his head. They carried him inside the pavilion on the ship and laid him to rest on the quilt, propping him with cushions. Then they brought alcohol, fruit and herbs (ray−han) and placed them beside him. Next they brought bread, meat and onions, which they cast in front of him, a dog, which they cut in two and which they threw onto the ship, and all of his weaponry, which they placed beside him. They then brought two mounts, made them gallop until they began to sweat, cut them up into pieces and threw the flesh onto the ship. They next fetched two cows, which they also cut up into pieces and threw on board, and a cock and a hen, which they slaughtered and cast onto it.
Meanwhile, the slave-girl who wished to be killed was coming and going, entering one pavilion after another. The owner of the pavilion would have intercourse with her and say to her, “Tell your master that I have done this purely out of love for you.”
At the time of the evening prayer on Friday they brought the slave-girl to a thing that they had constructed, like a door-frame. She placed her feet on the hands of the men and was raised above that door-frame. She said something and they brought her down. Then they lifted her up a second time and she did what she had done the first time. They brought her down and then lifted her up a third time and she did what she had done on the first two occasions. They next handed her a hen. She cut off its head and threw it away. They took the hen and threw it on board the ship.
I quizzed the interpreter about her actions and he said, “She said, ‘Behold, I see my father and my mother’, ‘Behold, I see all of my dead kindred, seated’, ‘Behold, I see my master, seated in Paradise. Paradise is beautiful and verdant. He is accompanied by his men and his male-slaves. He summons me, so bring me to him.’”
So they brought her to the ship and she removed two bracelets that she was wearing, handing them to the woman called the “Angel of Death,” the one who was to kill her. She also removed two anklets that she was wearing, handing them to the two slave-girls who had waited upon her: they were the daughters of
the crone known as the “Angel of Death.” Then they lifted her onto the ship but did not bring her into the pavilion. The men came with their shields and sticks and handed her a cup of alcohol over which she chanted and then drank. The interpreter said to me, “Thereby she bids her female companions farewell.” She was handed another cup, which she took and chanted for a long time, while the crone urged her to drink it and to enter the pavilion in which her master lay. I saw that she was befuddled and wanted to enter the pavilion but she had <only> put her head into the pavilion <while her body remained outside it>. The crone grabbed hold of her head and dragged her into the pavilion, entering it at the same time. The men began to bang their shields with the sticks so that her screams could not be heard and so terrify the other slave-girls, who would not, then, seek to die with their masters.
Six men entered the pavilion and all had intercourse with the slave-girl. They laid her down beside her master and two of them took hold of her feet, two her hands. The crone called the “Angel of Death” placed a rope around her neck in such a way that the ends crossed one another (mukhalafan) and handed it to two <of the men> to pull on it. She advanced with a broad-bladed dagger and began to thrust it in and out between her ribs, now here, now there, while the two men throttled her with the rope until she died.
Then the deceased’s next of kin approached and took hold of a piece of wood and set fire to it. He walked backwards, with the back of his neck to the ship, his face to the people, with the lighted piece of wood in one hand and the other hand on his anus, being completely naked. He ignited the wood that had been set up under the ship after they had placed the slave-girl whom they had killed beside her master. Then the people came forward with sticks and firewood. Each one carried a stick, the end of which he had set fire to, and which he threw on top of the wood. The wood caught fire, and then the ship, the pavilion, the man, the slave-girl and all it contained. A dreadful wind arose and the flames leapt higher and blazed fiercely.

Ah, do I need to mention that vikings also had wives, no? I can imagine the shitstorm if Skellige was depicted as real vikings.

 

[RegisTheMan]

said your list in your earlier post have nothing to do with maturity. Now you're trying to avoid the point.

As for choices the witch choice has very obvious good an bad option like in Bioware games, but you can even come up with a moral that one must be polite (yeah, who would have guessed). Non-investigating the 5th victim... I bet there was not a single player who didn't go to learn who's the last victim even if for the sake of curiosity. And "where's my share, duchess? whoops you're dead" is not about being mature, it's about being an idiot, it's like being rude to elves in TW2 who're aiming at you from all directions. "The warble..." is a good quest, yes, and nobody's denying that. But all this have nothing to do with your point that since the game has blood, gore and some poo then this must be mature game. Wrong.

Blood, gore and etc are the part of mature content anyways. That was just the most obvious and abstract example. Especially when in TW3 it's not just flying limbs and blood rain.
The kid's corpse sometimes can trigger all these mental ebola defenders or sjw way harder than some nudity or any acts of penetrartion.

About the obvious choices. You know, it's always a part of roleplay. Some ppl will never bend the knee cuz *their* Geralt is such an alpha male. Some people will never trust the witch. Actually the quest we are talking about has no bad and good choices. It has just bad, worse, and the worst endings simply because of bitter aftertaste in any of them. The quest with Vivienne got the happy ending, but you need to betray her trust first - again, for some people it's hard to break the word. So I say that in these dramatic side quests the choices are tough. That's the real maturity.

Also the very important part of the roleplay is your own imagination and feeling about tomorrow.
Like
Who do you choose? A very changeable duchess, her autistic sister, people of Bocleaur or Regis. There were nothing about Regis keeping in danger ending but we know that higher vampire killing someone from his kind is a crime in their codex. The crime which has to be punished. So basically by forcing Regis to kill Dethlaff, Geralt put his close friend on the risk. We already saw one bruxa hostile to him. Again, the tough choice.
I didn't care about Syanna at all, but I did care about the contract Geralt took and I did care about Regis.
Let Dethlaff go and make no blood on your friend's hands or finish your job? With dead Syanna Geralt ends in prison in both ways but with different feelings for the player: as the witcher who screwed up and didnt complete the contract or as the witcher who's in prison just because the duchess was in the bad mood.

____________________________________

Now again about sex.
I really don't get for what all these quotes and links for. Interesting, yes, but nothing in common with sex content in TW.
There is simply no hidden meaning in erotic interactions about how good/bad sex is.
No hints that *your* Geralt is cheating and doing something wrong. The only things the characters can judge is just which waifu you've picked.
Slept with Keira? Didn't? No aftermath.
Same with Shani? Escaped from the wedding? No aftermath.
Mb had a night with Carthia? Not a single repercussion.
Absolutely nothing. Nobody cares, nobody judges.

The number of sexual partners does not matter as well.
Honestly, I wanted Geralt to bang Tomira. She definitely looked ready for some action and there was a little disappoinment after.
But then I was thinking...is it any difference? Cuz complaining that 'Why cannot sleep with *name*? is like to complain about 'Why cannot rob the merchants and always have to buy?

What was the meaning of sex in Geralt's life? For the first time just the way to relax: nothing more, nothing less.
After meeting with Yennefer it was intimacy, his highest sensations. Without her - the way to feel these sensations with women having a reflection of another in his nead.
In The Witcher 1 we have his 'preyennefer' standarts.
In the next games that feeling's back again but now player can replace Yennefer with Triss.

Ofc player can choose the loner wolf path ignoring/sleeping with both sorceresses and in this way not enough characters to have sex with is could be a *problem* but I bet that 90% of players chose one of the sorceresses. And at least 50% of these 90% didn't even *cheating* and were loyal the whole game. The only uncool thing is just that every scene except the ones with Geralt's waifus, Shani and Syanna are just the same. Simply made it look very robotic.

 

[Sephira]

Why so edgy? That post, which I was commenting, was upvoted by every present female participant... you don't like face the facts?

"edgy"

"you don't like face the facts?"

:rofl:

Yeah keep your bait about "strategies" very far from me and this thread, it's not that every human being (female or male) shares your vision, just accept that. Psychology will do.

 

[Maerd]

it's not that every human being (female or male) shares your vision

That's a given and always was. But you still afraid to reveal what was wrong with the fact that female population in this thread is pretty much in agreement that Geralt should not have sexual encounters besides Syanna and whores in B&W and claim that it's an ultimate truth.

 

[StandardEpiphany]

That's a given and always was. But you still afraid to reveal what was wrong with the fact that female population in this thread is pretty much in agreement that Geralt should not have sexual encounters besides Syanna and whores in B&W and claim that it's an ultimate truth.

From perusing this thread, I have seen people make arguments against the idea that there should be an option to shag more female characters just because there used to be one in the previous games. A reasonable statement, which was supported by lore references and personal views on male/female interactions, though not one that I agree with when in comes to an RPG that has built quite a reputation in this department.


I haven't seen anyone, not even women (of which I am one), argue that Geralt should only have sex with whores because sex is a dirty dirty thing. Suggestions were made that one could always visit the brothel if the volume of non-whore options is unsatisfying. Again, a valid option, even in real life.

The discussion about maturity is a different beast altogether, since the number of sexual encounters alone is not indicative of their content, and the Witcher games have gone everywhere from ridiculously gross to surprisingly entertaining when it comes to depictions of sexuality.

 

[Sephira]

That's a given and always was. But you still afraid to reveal what was wrong with the fact that female population in this thread is pretty much in agreement that Geralt should not have sexual encounters besides Syanna and whores in B&W and claim that it's an ultimate truth.

What. You're also the one who is claiming that Geralt retiring is out of character. That sounds like forcing some kind of vision.

But you still afraid to reveal what was wrong with the fact

Afraid of what? Wrong what? I read that even "male" population doesn't even like Syanna encounter, while it's just indifferent to me since I haven't the time at the moment to complete the other ending.

But here, since you're a bit lazy, no offense, doc.

Well, you understood my post so I repeat to make it even more clear, I just say that since you can have that in the base game I don't see the absence of it in Blood and Wine as something that ruins the mood, so nothing worse to complain about. Considering that for the game reasons in BaW, both ways are possible, having a new romance or not.

Complain, forums are also for this (but often people wake up just to criticize and for waifu wars).

Vivienne: Witcher, thank you for saving me from this curse, I want to live my life, why not having sex just to show you gratitude?

The question is always the same: why would you sleep with Anna or Vivienne? Just for the sake of having a sexual encounter? I don't understand. Also Vivienne doesn't give a damn about that (and Guillame is certainly better than Geralt) let alone having a sexual encounter when her mind is definitely far from that.
Anna Henrietta, why should she? I mean... come on... the duchess of Toussaint having an affair with a witcher coming from the North, just out of nowhere. It's clear it just couldn't work.

Sounds ridicolous.

They should have put another Jutta, so people wouldn't start to have fantasies over those 2 characters, lol.

"No new sexual encounters, I feel so alone and it's lore breaking"

But hey, we have to reach that point of absurdity. Guys, just complain you didn't have another Jutta. It makes more sense. But don't touch characters who really wouldn't have nothing to do with it.

 

[Maerd]

Now again about sex.
I really don't get for what all these quotes and links for. Interesting, yes, but nothing in common with sex content in TW.
There is simply no hidden meaning in erotic interactions about how good/bad sex is.
No hints that *your* Geralt is cheating and doing something wrong. The only things the characters can judge is just which waifu you've picked.
Slept with Keira? Didn't? No aftermath.
Same with Shani? Escaped from the wedding? No aftermath.
Mb had a night with Carthia? Not a single repercussion.
Absolutely nothing. Nobody cares, nobody judges.

And why exactly there must be hidden meaning that sexual interactions are good or bad? This is really puzzling. The nature of Geralt being a mutant and a witcher by a common sense define what he does and how he interacts with women. Imagine yourself in his place and you don't have a load previous save option like in the game. Every fight can be your last one. Tomorrow you go to hunt some monster, which has a good probability to kill you. And to kill you means not to reload the save game but for real. And you met a beautiful woman whom you're attracted to and she likes you too. This may be your last day in life... will you have sex with her if she's fine with that? Note that you also don't have a wife, children, any property and all that stuff, just some girlfriend whom you love but she's far away and you see her rarely, and, in case of Yen, she also a psychopath who makes your life miserable if you ever try to argue with her... In my humble opinion, the answer is pretty obvious. And yes, nobody cares, nobody will post pictures of Geralt with a woman made by hidden camera on the Facebook to harass him.

And the links and quotes to show how people perceived sex before Christian morality started to dominate, they didn't feel shame about sex, like people do now. The witcher's world is pagan therefore it applies. If you think of it from the side, wanting new sexual encounters in the game differs not from say wanting new set of armor. CDPR will be destroyed by moralists if they make free sexual encounter dlc but will be praised for new armor... all because of the medieval cultural fossils in people's brains.

What was the meaning of sex in Geralt's life?

Well, that's pretty simple. The same as for any other human being. This is our natural need as social interaction. If human beings are lacking either sex or social activity they don't die but suffer.

After meeting with Yennefer it was intimacy, his highest sensations. Without her - the way to feel these sensations with women having a reflection of another in his nead.

Let's be real here, love like when you're going crazy about someone cannot happen for a very long time. It's connected to procreation cycle and can last up to about five years after which love becomes either more of a friendship with sex or people start to hate each other and separate. Scientifically proven. And, by the way, when people are in love like crazy they have sex every day and many times when it is possible.

 

[Tzirael]

The expansion does feel quite lackluster in the romance terms. Even if we go for "Geralt has matured and is in a committed relationship" angle, he doesn't even get to have any real intimacy with either Triss or Yen, which would have made a ton of sense for either relationship and in the context of the story. Options would have been nice, alas we have what we have.

 

[Maerd]

From perusing this thread, I have seen people make arguments against the idea that there should be an option to shag more female characters just because there used to be one in the previous games. A reasonable statement, which was supported by lore references and personal views on male/female interactions, though not one that I agree with when in comes to an RPG that has built quite a reputation in this department.

Some people argue that, sure. I argue that they have a right to argue not only based on previous games but based on the books too, which should be a primary reference. I'm for balance, correct representation of the lore, and for mature depiction of sex, which TW2 provided but not TW3 base game or B&W.

I haven't seen anyone, not even women (of which I am one), argue that Geralt should only have sex with whores because sex is a dirty dirty thing. Suggestions were made that one could always visit the brothel if the volume of non-whore options is unsatisfying. Again, a valid option, even in real life.

You can find such opinions in this thread. Advice to visit a brothel would definitely be valid in real life but in real life nobody limits you, it's all up to you. In the discussion about whether or not this game had enough sex included it is literally means "fuck you" to person with whom you suppose to be discussing like adults.

The discussion about maturity is a different beast altogether, since the number of sexual encounters alone is not indicative of their content.

And this is true. The TW3 and B&W are not mature games by combination of many factors, B&W being more mature than TW3 but not by much. Hearts of Stone stands out here as a proper way to make mature games.

 

[jimmywon34]

Exactly the point I was trying to make earlier with someone else that it's awkward and weird you can plough the hell out of brothel hookers but not even so much as an option to kiss Triss. And apparently Yen too. when if sex, or just romance in general, would've made any sense after the MQ(or B&W) it would've made sense with one of them if you picked one.

 

[Maerd]

Vivienne: Witcher, thank you for saving me from this curse, I want to live my life, why not having sex just to show you gratitude?

The question is always the same: why would you sleep with Anna or Vivienne? Just for the sake of having a sexual encounter? I don't understand. Also Vivienne doesn't give a damn about that (and Guillame is certainly better than Geralt) let alone having a sexual encounter when her mind is definitely far from that.
Anna Henrietta, why should she? I mean... come on... the duchess of Toussaint having an affair with a witcher coming from the North, just out of nowhere. It's clear it just couldn't work.

Sounds ridicolous.

Indeed, ridiculous. You're not a good writer and, therefore, cannot come up with a good story, I agree.

 

[Kinley]

Let's tone it down a notch, people. Easy on the personal attacks.

 

[Krull32]

Just add a succubus option and everyone is happy, right ? Right !