- Status
Exactly, thank you. It was unintentional betrayal and at that point her heart was broken, she was rejected twice and she had to start depending on herself. Also, when it comes to Sorceresses, all of them betrayed Geralt at one point or another, no one is clean on that list a Lodge member or not.
I've got my hands on save file with Yen romance before tent and it was sad that Triss say Goodluck no matter with romance or not.
Nothing changes.
You only know now. I have lived with this knowledge for nearly two months now
I couldn't play with Yen romance, no matter how I like her, I love Triss more and I couldn't say farewell to her.You only know now. I have lived with this knowledge for nearly two months now
Do you mean she couldn't have stayed with him and helped as a friend, without romantic activity? That sounds like a conditional friend.
In both Witcher 1 and Witcher 2, player doesn't get to chose having relations with Triss at the beginning of the games. Later yes, but it's clear CDPR made games and story that carried over in Witcher 3 as if Geralt did in fact romance Triss.
Which kinda makes player decisions obsolete and defines Triss character regardless of what players saw her as.
Neither could I, because let's be honest, how can you not love Triss?
Me too :thumbup:
But i have a friend who in team Yen, so i know most of what happen with Yen if you romance her
She was friend with benefits, it was Geralt who pursue romance
Hmm don't know what Triss can gain if she in relationship with Geralt, beside she is very happy of course. So i fix this for you
Hey i meant like Keira but Geralt didn`t chase herHmm don't know what Triss can gain if she in relationship with Geralt, beside she is very happy of course. So i fix this for you
She could've, it depends on your choice, you can avoid sleeping with her in Kaer Morhen. After that what happens was mainly based on re-establishing Geralt's personality. Also, what happens from that point on (Mainly referring to TW2: Assassin of Kings) events only makes sense, because if we could've chosen to proceed with our relationship with Shani, the events that happened in TW2 which helped Geralt regain his memory and defined his personality, never would've happened.
TW1 you can choose between her and Shani.
TW2 if Shani was a choice of romance, it would've killed the story-line.
TW3 the people who are in a relationship with Triss were forced to go through the dream in Kaer Morhen with Yennefer, so, you can probably imagine that we felt the same way you did on the beginning of TW2 if you expected to see Yennefer instead of her.
It all comes back to what you choose to do in TW1, TW2 you have the choice to play as Geralt (When he still had the amnesia) and you can simply walk away from her even before you regained your memory.
EDIT reason: Typos.
Last edited:
I guess that's a moral decision everyone makes for themselves. Emotions are possible to control, if people care enough to control them.
I would've thought if a person loves someone, then they'd want that love to be returned in full, with a clear conscience.
It's the same we don't kill someone just because we feel hate.
But if you feel like this is throwing stones, I'll stop posting here. Only came because certain people commented in a different thread and felt it needed to be discussed further.
Adios!
Yep i know you use the quotes from Keira, but it can't apply to Triss situation here. Triss lost almost everything but she gain one thing: Geralt's love for her :wub:
I wonder if you have read my post
Not this againAnd that's why I ship
Don't kill me please
Last edited:
I know i am late to this thread, but I'd like to add i would like the option to buy back her amulet from the couple who she is renting from if she gave it to them, giving it back to her if they are in a relationship. It just felt wrong that i wouldn't do that for Triss since it is her favourite.
Last edited:
But that's the point, I don't see it as a betrayal. Would Yennefer have taken the higher moral ground if the roles were reversed? Would you? Would any of us? It's a case of stones being thrown in glass houses. Love, by its very nature, is irrational. People don't think clearly, emotions take control and people just act in accordance with those emotions. It's no more a betrayal than the wind blowing your house down. It's just human nature.
Not this again
Sapkowski's idea, not mine. Can't get it out of my head ever since, sorry.
Very true.
Last edited:
I remember one player told that even if you let the landlord take the amulet, it return after few cutscene, is it true ???
If Geralt is with Yen, so this ship looks good, because Eskel is awesome and cool, and he is second who I love from Wolf School witchers. But as I always will go for Geralt&Triss, so this is not my way.
- Status