I hope and I think we are all adults here - and that we can peacefully discuss suggestions and different opinions about the characters we like. I'm sure most of us can be friends here
In the moment you suggest to changes that should imply a change in Yen's mother role the exclusivity is broken. And it still not a private forum. It's public, And I can give my opinion about your suggestion... or some of you are saying I'm having prohibited this possibility unless I'd break any rules of the forum?
That's Zyvik's (Yen fan) absolutely fave gif he is posting this everyday!
*Gahh* I hate this gif :mean:Let's live in peace and friendship
Definitely. All we ever asked for is to have those extra conversation with Triss as we do with Yennefer (In the events of romancing either one of them) having both of them interacting with you depending on whether if you romanced either one them or not would be perfect. Equality and validation for Triss as a romance option, It's really all we ever asked for. Wherever you can start a conversation with Yenenfer, we should be able to start a conversation in that area with Triss (Since she's out love-interest).
---------- Updated at 07:50 AM ----------
The inconsistencies as I see them.
1. The Rose of Remembrance (Being able to give her back The Rose of Remembrance).
2. Not being able to tell her that we broke up with Yen for good (We should be able to tell her that we broke up with Yen during that conversation where she asks about her during Pyres of Novigrad).
3. Her not being present at Kaer Morhen (She really should be there, we're missing out on the biggest part of their relationship, the reunion after going through all that trouble to find Uma/Ciri).
4. Yennefer's kiss and not being able to kiss Triss after (Yes, I wanted to kiss her after that to reassure her that nothing is going on behind her back and yes, I wanted to do in front of Yen).
5. No interaction with her upon our arrival with Ciri to Kaer Morhen (If the previous option is not provided, we really should've been able to interact with Triss, it seems only fair since we can interact with Keira before the battle).
6. Geralt running toward Yennefer to embrace one another after the battle. (Triss is my romance option, she should be the one doing that).
7. Ciri's conversation with the Lodge (Triss she be the one present there if she's our love-interest).
8. Triss providing more information about our house in Pont Vanis as she said she would after saving Philippa.
9. A conversation between Triss, Ciri and Geralt (To make up for her being missing during Avallac'h laboratory or just adding her there with the rest of the family).
10. A Conversation on the boat in Skellige (Being able to interact with her and do anything other than "Well?").
11. A romantic conversation with her in the tent before the final battle (It's only fair since Yennefer gets one).
12. Triss should be the one saving Geralt instead of Yennefer from The Wild Hunt hounds (After defeating Eredin and she should be the one riding with him to the tower)
At the point where all of the mentioned above is provided, we reach the point of having her as a valid romance option, we finally reached (Equality).
EDIT reason: Update.
Agree with this also Yen should definitely be at Avallac’h lab. But Triss can be added to "The Sunstone" quest, makes more sense.Equally with 9, Triss doesn’t make sense at Avallac’h lab. I wouldn’t mind her having more conversation with Ciri but since that’s a big issue with Yen romancers it certainly isn’t a major priority imo to equalise experience
Sad that we've got this nice scene of them both only in Tango quest. They could together celebrate defiting Wild Hunt.*Gahh* I hate this gif
Why should Triss save Geralt? Is there any indication in the plot that this scene is in any way related to Geralt's potential romance option?12. Triss should be the one saving Geralt instead of Yennefer from The Wild Hunt hounds (After defeating Eredin and she should be the one riding with him to the tower)
I support 1,8,10 & 11 with my heart, the other ones not very important for meOriginally Posted by Pryce68
Definitely. All we ever asked for is to have those extra conversation with Triss as we do with Yennefer (In the events of romancing either one of them) having both of them interacting with you depending on whether if you romanced either one them or not would be perfect. Equality and validation for Triss as a romance option, It's really all we ever asked for. Wherever you can start a conversation with Yenenfer, we should be able to start a conversation in that area with Triss (Since she's out love-interest).
---------- Updated at 07:50 AM ----------
The inconsistencies as I see them.
1. The Rose of Remembrance (Being able to give her back The Rose of Remembrance).
2. Not being able to tell her that we broke up with Yen for good (We should be able to tell her that we broke up with Yen during that conversation where she asks about her during Pyres of Novigrad).
3. Her not being present at Kaer Morhen (She really should be there, we're missing out on the biggest part of their relationship, the reunion after going through all that trouble to find Uma/Ciri).
4. Yennefer's kiss and not being able to kiss Triss after (Yes, I wanted to kiss her after that to reassure her that nothing is going on behind her back and yes, I wanted to do in front of Yen).
5. No interaction with her upon our arrival with Ciri to Kaer Morhen (If the previous option is not provided, we really should've been able to interact with Triss, it seems only fair since we can interact with Keira before the battle).
6. Geralt running toward Yennefer to embrace one another after the battle. (Triss is my romance option, she should be the one doing that).
7. Ciri's conversation with the Lodge (Triss she be the one present there if she's our love-interest).
8. Triss providing more information about our house in Pont Vanis as she said she would after saving Philippa.
9. A conversation between Triss, Ciri and Geralt (To make up for her being missing during Avallac'h laboratory or just adding her there with the rest of the family).
10. A Conversation on the boat in Skellige (Being able to interact with her and do anything other than "Well?").
11. A romantic conversation with her in the tent before the final battle (It's only fair since Yennefer gets one).
12. Triss should be the one saving Geralt instead of Yennefer from The Wild Hunt hounds (After defeating Eredin and she should be the one riding with him to the tower)
At the point where all of the mentioned above is provided, we reach the point of having her as a valid romance option, we finally reached (Equality).
EDIT reason: Update.
12. Triss should be the one saving Geralt instead of Yennefer from The Wild Hunt hounds (After defeating Eredin and she should be the one riding with him to the tower)
At the point where all of the mentioned above is provided, we reach the point of having her as a valid romance option, we finally reached (Equality).
Regarding 2, as I’m already mentioned I disagree as it would negatively impinge upon Novigrad Triss Arc. It’s not like there’s a comparative scene involving Yen, mentioning you let Triss go for good.
Equally with 10. It is understandable for Yen to be there trying to get to her daughter Ciri. I’d accept the notion of Triss being there too but excluding Yen is a big no no imo.
So, it's not a romance issue but Triss' fan demand, because the original story line creaated by CDPR is simple. Ciri's Mother searching witcher for saving both daughter and do it. Having romance o not between both of them or with Triss or Keira or with no one is absolutly nothing to do with the main plot.
So, Triis and Yen should must be remove in some scenes because the player who choose dont have any romance? Is it that how it works?
Sorry for my rough looks. English is not my language, but I try.
Why should Triss save Geralt? Is there any indication in the plot that this scene is in any way related to Geralt's potential romance option?
Triss riding with Geralt to the tower is an even worse suggestion because Yen does this in her role as Ciri's mother figure who would do everything to save her and not as Geralt's love interest.
I think you would get much more support if you stop trying to change the plot just for the sake to add more romance time between Geralt and Triss and stop to ignore the special relationship between Ciri and Yen or try to invent a mother/daughter relationship between Triss and Ciri, which never existed.
@LaPadite Please edit the post provided in this link forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/51724-Triss-Merigold-(all-spoilers)?p=1830804&viewfull=1#post1830804
There is no need to insult anyone. There was a simple misunderstanding about one of the things we were trying to point out.
Why should Triss save Geralt? Is there any indication in the plot that this scene is in any way related to Geralt's potential romance option?
Triss riding with Geralt to the tower is an even worse suggestion because Yen does this in her role as Ciri's mother figure who would do everything to save her and not as Geralt's love interest.
I think you would get much more support if you stop trying to change the plot just for the sake to add more romance time between Geralt and Triss and stop to ignore the special relationship between Ciri and Yen or try to invent a mother/daughter relationship between Triss and Ciri, which never existed.
Only if the player decide to do Novagrad first. Nothing say we have to complete Novagrad before Skellege. I prefer to complete Skellege before Novagrad, its an open world so we are free to do it however we like.
I dont think anyone want to remove Yen from the boat
---------- Updated at 10:19 AM ----------
You are missing the point, that is not what everyone want. Like i said the list was a draft, somehow everyone is treating it like its law. Never thought a simple list is going to start fire in the camp.
Well as long as I can see, and the RED points given, it doesn't seems just a simple list
I don’t think Suggesting removing Yen serves our cause well at all.