Triss Merigold of Maribor (All Spoilers) Resurgence

+
Again, I respectfully disagree.

Triss had three games. Yennefer one. Shani, now, two.

It's Yennefer time.

Look, I feel your pain, I romanced Shani and woke up with Triss in TW2. I was pushed to Triss all the way TW2, a character I never trusted on TW1.

But wasting resources that could be used to fix Eredin, post game, Djikstra, etc in a romance is something I won't support.
 
Again, I respectfully disagree.

Triss had three games. Yennefer one. Shani, now, two.

It's Yennefer time.

Look, I feel your pain, I romanced Shani and woke up with Triss in TW2. I was pushed to Triss all the way TW2, a character I never trusted on TW1.

But wasting resources that could be used to fix Eredin, post game, Djikstra, etc in a romance is something I won't support.

Doesn't matter. You can't view it in terms of the other three games. They made a creative decision to put her, not Yen, in the first game and another creative decision to allow her to be in the third game as a romance choice. With that decision made, there are no excuses for lack of parity. She's either all in or all out, not half and half.

Besides, as I said, adding those three characters to the beginning, rather than the end of Act 2 provides a platform for additional content. Kaer Morhen can't have a notice board so it can't have Witcher contracts, they need to be secondary quests. Secondary quests that can be based around those characters. Similarly, if you're to remove the lock in, and force the player to choose, doing so in Act 2 makes more sense than doing so in Act 3.

Contrary to popular belief, this isn't some 'I love Triss so want more of her' thing, I've actually put some thought in to how improving that part of the story can improve other parts of the game currently lacking. Feel free to disagree, just don't think I'm after a waifu simulator, as I've been accused of before.
 
Again, I respectfully disagree.

Triss had three games. Yennefer one. Shani, now, two.

It's Yennefer time.

This is a nonsense excuse, Yennefer had way more content already and a whole bunch of books, so with your reasoning in mind we need more Triss content to make it even.

But they won't, they know that a lot of their community have pretty strong feelings either way if they will add content for only Triss or Yen, so they will do neither, or both. But neither is more likely.
 
Last edited:
This is a nonsense excuse, Yennefer had way more content already and a whole bunch of books, so with your reasoning in mind we need more Triss content to make it even.

Well, Triss was also in the books. If we combine her content in the books with her content in the games she has the same amount of attention as Yennefer.
 
I am really baffled I didn't think Triss was handled that badly . Either way you play it Yen or Triss you can still get the happily ever after ending . After finishing the books I don't see much of a problem here . Triss cares deeply about Geralt it shows . In the books she was pining away for her opportunities or flashes of jealousy . I can agree there are some areas where stuff could have been fleshed out more but it is still up to the player to make the choice regardless of who seems more pushed or not . Triss would willing take Geralt so there is no problem there . The problem is Yen and Triss's friendship would be shattered , it was close to being that way near the end of the books .with Yen's little he is my man speech . Personally I don't care if they provide more content with them in it or not . I am happy with what I got and after all is said and done the lack of clarity on thing doesn't prevent me from playing because it is still good any way you slice it .
 
Pretty much Personally I'd prefer more of neither. Unless of course it's something meaningful and not just another romance "fix".

Sure, I agree with that. But I'm sure they could come up with some good reason other then romance to involve Triss\Yen. Maybe have geralt get captured and play from Ciri's perspective saving him together with Yen and Triss for a change lol.
 
A couple of good points here. It does annoy me no end that the game still pushes you towards Yen rather than treating Triss as an equally valid romance.

As far as I can tell, there are actually no changes in the patch that conditionally remove scenes or dialogues that push the player towards Yennefer even after a choice has been made. That is why I suggested the idea of fixing them with mods (as it is easier than adding new content, so it should be realistically possible eventually as community made tools improve). Kind of like the unofficial patches for Bethesda games. :p

i. The number of people who are actually requesting fixes is relatively small. I know it may not appear that way when you frequent the forums or visit threads like these, but it's important to take into account that forum members comprise a teeny tiny percentage of CDPR's customers. We're talking something like less than 1%. And of that 1%, the fraction of people who actually romanced Triss and have expressed dissatisfaction with her portrayal in-game is even more minuscule.

Not that I think more changes are planned, but the actual number of people not satisfied, while overall a minority, is actually much higher than those who complained on the forums, as only a small percentage of players post on the forums at all. Although this also applies to a number of other shortcomings of the game. Not having an account at that time yet, I did not even vote in this thread myself.

ii. It would probably be cost prohibitive to do a complete rewrite and isn't very realistic. Every time that CDPR makes substantial alterations they have to call in the writers, voice actors, programmers, Q & A teams, bug testers. It's a whole production.

I do not think anyone asked for a complete rewrite, but a few times more than what is in the patch (that is, something comparable to the amount of content in a quest), and I do not only mean romance content, would have been realistically possible.

iii. Given what Wild Hunt set out to accomplish, I think it's entirely reasonable that Yennefer has a larger role within the game. The main quest is about Geralt's search for his adoptive daughter and the familial bond which he, Yennefer, and Ciri share. It's also the first and probably only time that Yennefer is going to make an appearance within the franchise, so it should come as no surprise that the developers had to accord her more screen time for exposition and things of that nature.

It is not only a matter of overall screen time. Yennefer has about 1.5 times more dialogue over the entire game (I counted 1173 vs. 788 lines, only 20 / 26 of those is from patch 1.10), so that may not seem like a huge difference at first, but on a closer look one can see the problems with Triss in TW3:
- very little content - again, it is not just romance related stuff, but in general - in the second act (only 32 lines total) and in much of the third one except Final Preparations; compared to the quality of the Novigrad quest line up to and including Now or Never, it looks like she turns into a character from Skyrim
- lack of reaction to the player's choice made in Now or Never, especially in the first two acts. The only notable scene where it makes a difference before Final Preparations is the brief dialogue when Geralt returns from the Isle of Mists with Ciri before the battle of Kaer Morhen, and that is with the patch. In particular, it is completely ignored during the Skellige and Ugly Baby quest lines, both normally played after Now or Never when following the recommended quest levels, and during these quests there are several opportunities to talk about Geralt's relationships, or more precisely just one of them
- the "stay vs. leave" choice makes no difference at all, she disappears anyway and is not in Kaer Morhen during Ugly Baby, contradicting the dialogue in the lighthouse, and no explanation is given to this in the game
- a worse version of not reacting to the player's choice, the game sometimes behaves as if Yennefer was romanced instead. Perhaps the developers implemented that as the "default" path, and then lazily tacked on the alternatives, with only some of the scenes getting modified. It is a similar kind of problem the TW2 save import system suffers from (speaking of that, there is no reaction whatsoever to it in Geralt-Triss dialogues)
- in some cases, bad quality of content (writing, voice acting, etc.) that ends up feeling rushed
- although not a high priority, for completeness I mention that sex content is rather lacking compared to Yennefer's and to the previous games. I hope that is not a way of selling Yennefer as the preferred choice to new players

Frankly, I'm amazed and grateful that CDPR even went to the trouble of including Triss as a romance option in this third and final game. Geralt recovering his memories provided them with a convenient means to end Triss and Geralt's relationship, and they could have just as easily focused entirely on Yennefer.

They could have done that, but removing choice would have made the game worse, although that is a matter of another discussion. It is already plenty dumbed down in other aspects. In any case, they did add the choice, so why not actually do a competent job of implementing it ? The Witcher 1 is a low budget indie game in comparison, yet it did the Shani/Triss choice better, in terms of how it reacts to it in dialogues etc., and also with a more equal treatment of the choices.

The additions which they implemented with patch 1.10 were also more than I was expecting. When CDPR said "small tweaks," I was expecting a few extra lines of dialogue inserted here and there, not whole new cut scenes.

Well, technically they are small tweaks, 130 lines total vs. up to ~40000 in the game (DLC not included). And some of that was actually used to add more Yennefer content, and also a few dialogues for Hearts of Stone.

I do hope that there are a few more opportunities to interact with Yennefer, Triss, and Ciri in the upcoming expansion Blood & Wine.

I doubt that, I think patch 1.10 could very well have added their last lines.

Again, I respectfully disagree.

Triss had three games. Yennefer one. Shani, now, two.

Sorry, but that kind of reasoning makes no sense. Just because a main character is present in previous game(s), it is not a reason to have half-assed content in the third one. Should Geralt have been removed from the game after Velen (playing as Ciri for the rest of it) since he already had enough time in TW1 and TW2 ?
 
Last edited:
Not that I think more changes are planned, but the actual number of people not satisfied, while overall a minority, is actually much higher than those who complained on the forums, as only a small percentage of players post on the forums at all.

To which other sources are you referring?

Although this also applies to a number of other shortcomings of the game. Not having an account at that time yet, I did not even vote in this thread myself.

It stands to reason that, if people were passionate enough about the issue and they really wanted to effect change, they would probably post on the forum. Even if I was charitable and multiplied those 1,192 people who voted times 100 to account for people who might have purchased the game late, that's still about .019% of the consumers who bought Wild Hunt.

I do not think anyone asked for a complete rewrite, but a few times more than what is in the patch (that is, something comparable to the amount of content in a quest), and I do not only mean romance content, would have been realistically possible.

Saladin, DaWitcher and others have asked for considerable more than "the amount of content in a quest." I will give you credit for at least being more reasonable.

Again, limited time, resources, and money. CDPR made due with what they had, and decided that, for narrative purposes, they would concentrate on Yennefer. Given the themes of Wild Hunt, I think that is entirely reasonable. Not all content has to be doled out in equal measures.

...on a closer look one can see the problems with Triss in TW3:

- lack of reaction to the player's choice made in Now or Never, especially in the first two acts.

I am content with the corrections that CDPR made in 1.10. Not every npc in the game is privy to Geralt's ever changing romantic entanglements, and even if they are, there are often more pressing matters to discuss: e.g. civil war in Skellige, the conflict between Radovic and Nilfgaard, the impending Apocalypse, the invasion of the Wild Hunt. As far as I am concerned, the only people who have a vested interest in whom Geralt chooses to sleep with is Geralt, Ciri, Yennefer, and Triss.

Sorry, but that kind of reasoning makes no sense. Just because a main character is present in previous game(s), it is not a reason to have half-assed content in the third one. Should Geralt have been removed from the game after Velen (playing as Ciri for the rest of it) since he already had enough time in TW1 and TW2 ?

That's not really a fair point of comparison. Geralt is the protagonist of the novels and the games. Triss occupies a rather small corner in Sapkowski's universe, and while her role in the games is considerably more important, at the end of the day she is still just a supporting member of the cast.
 
Last edited:
It stands to reason that, if people were passionate enough about the issue and they really wanted to effect change, they would probably post on the forum.

Again, the forum (including all registered members) is a very small sampling of all players of the game, but that does not mean that those who do not post do not care. Otherwise, one might just as well ignore all complaints and suggestions on the forum, as it is not like the others even managed to reach 1192 (add 1 from me) votes. In any case, what is most important is whether the developers themselves see a problem that needs to be fixed. If they are OK with what is currently in the game, then there is not much that can be done about that.

Given the themes of Wild Hunt, I think that is entirely reasonable. Not all content has to be doled out in equal measures.

As I already explained, it is not only a matter of equal content, although in some specific aspects that could reasonably have been expected. Some of the problems I listed would still exist on their own merit even if Yennefer was removed from the game entirely.

Not every npc in the game is privy to Geralt's ever changing romantic entanglements

Geralt could at least be privy to his own entanglements, though, and give answers that represent his choice in dialogues that already exist in the game.

That's not really a fair point of comparison.

The point was to show that the logic "character X has Y amount of content in the prequels, and should therefore have less now to compensate" makes no sense.

Triss occupies a rather small corner in Sapkowski's universe, and while her role in the games is considerably more important, at the end of the day she is still just a supporting member of the cast.

Actually, over the three games, she is second (in terms of total number of lines of dialogue) to Geralt, which is more than "just a supporting member of the cast". That makes it all the more disappointing that the last half game dropped the ball.
 
I am content with the corrections that CDPR made in 1.10. Not every npc in the game is privy to Geralt's ever changing romantic entanglements, and even if they are, there are often more pressing matters to discuss: e.g. civil war in Skellige, the conflict between Radovic and Nilfgaard, the impending Apocalypse, the invasion of the Wild Hunt. As far as I am concerned, the only people who have a vested interest in whom Geralt chooses to sleep with is Geralt, Ciri, Yennefer, and Triss.

I still despise the Kaer Morhen section and the snog and I still wish they had implemented the 2 romances equally when they first developed the game.
That said i'm reasonably content with the additions, merely because i had reasonable expectations of the sorts of additions we might get and i still enjoyed the romance despite its issues. I'm grateful that they spent the time to do them and they do add to the reactivity and the experience of the Triss romance.
 

Guest 3847602

Guest
Expecting the same amount of content between Yennefer and Triss in the main quest, which was about finding and protecting Ciri is a bit silly, no matter how Triss seemed important in the previous games. Yennefer's role as a mother is minuscule already after The Isle of Mists, diminishing it further would be even worse. Triss could have had a larger role in the politics, but sadly, they decided that the entire political game consists of TWO quests (the second being the worst written quest in the trilogy). The way TW3 is envisioned I don't see at all how the complete equality is possible.
The writers shouldn't force themselves to write the plot to fit the romances, it's the other way around. That was the case in TW2, for example, and I had no problem with that.
 
This is a nonsense excuse, Yennefer had way more content already and a whole bunch of books, so with your reasoning in mind we need more Triss content to make it even.

But they won't, they know that a lot of their community have pretty strong feelings either way if they will add content for only Triss or Yen, so they will do neither, or both. But neither is more likely.

I'm talking about the games. Nonsense is comparing different medias.

I've paid Red for the games, not the books.

Got a few Witcher books on Kindle but didn't read them fully.

@saladin1701 I know you're not proposing a Yen vs Triss war, Just want Merigold have as much romance time as Yennefer.

That's where we disagree. I think Triss had enough time in three games.

I'm not proposing more time for Yennefer. Maybe a better hug in Kaer Morhen, that's all.

I think it's time to another Story like HoS. I don't want to spend more time with Triss. I would accept some more time with Yen (but won't ask for it).

What I mean is there are other things in game to fix before touching the romances again :)

---------- Updated at 12:56 PM ----------

Sorry, but that kind of reasoning makes no sense. Just because a main character is present in previous game(s), it is not a reason to have half-assed content in the third one. Should Geralt have been removed from the game after Velen (playing as Ciri for the rest of it) since he already had enough time in TW1 and TW2 ?

Geralt is The Witcher. Not Triss. Not Yennefer. Removing him makes no sense.

I think it's too convenient discard Triss presence in former games for the sake of giving her more screen time in TW3. We disagree, it makes perfect sense to me.
 
I'm talking about the games. Nonsense is comparing different medias.

I've paid Red for the games, not the books.

Geralt is The Witcher. Not Triss. Not Yennefer. Removing him makes no sense.

So, would it have been OK to remove Yennefer from the last book or two, since she had enough time already ? She is not the witcher, and it is the same media, so you cannot complain.

I think it's too convenient discard Triss presence in former games for the sake of giving her more screen time in TW3.

The presence or absence of characters in previous games is irrelevant to how well (that is, not just in terms of quantity, but more importantly quality) their content is implemented in TW3. And if anything, having a lot of screen time previously indicates an important character, so there is more reason to have a decent amount again.

What I mean is there are other things in game to fix before touching the romances again

I doubt anything content related will ever be fixed in a significant way in TW3, so this is only a discussion of what could be fixed hypothetically. CDPR can decide without being told by fans what they want to fix, which at this point I guess is most likely nothing. This is also a thread titled "Triss Merigold of Maribor (All Spoilers) Resurgence", so that obviously limits what kind of issues in the game are on topic here.
 
Well, Triss was also in the books. If we combine her content in the books with her content in the games she has the same amount of attention as Yennefer.

Most of you are missing the entire point. This is a game, not the books, and whilst it's the third game in the trilogy, CDPR explicitly and repeatedly said you did not need to have either read the books (which was bullshit) or played the previous games. So having made that statement, you have to look at The Witcher 3 in complete isolation. Doing so, you have two romances. One, the game pushes you towards throughout, it has more content and the character is significantly more fleshed out than the other. That's were the imbalance lies. Not for people who've read the books or played the other games, but for those who haven't.

If CDPR wanted to use the fact Triss had been in the previous two games as justification for bias towards Yen, then they should have made a proper sequel and came up with a legitimate reason to write her out of the story. I dare say I see it clearer than many of you because I've not read the books so not come in to this game with any preconceptions. Unfortunately, CDPR have allowed their own preconceptions to interfer.
 
So, would it have been OK to remove Yennefer from the last book or two, since she had enough time already ? She is not the witcher, and it is the same media, so you cannot complain.

But Triss was not removed from TW3. She simply has less screen time than Yennefer. Besides it's not like Yen had a lot of page time in the last book.

---------- Updated at 02:08 PM ----------

Most of you are missing the entire point. This is a game, not the books, and whilst it's the third game in the trilogy, CDPR explicitly and repeatedly said you did not need to have either read the books (which was bullshit) or played the previous games. So having made that statement, you have to look at The Witcher 3 in complete isolation. Doing so, you have two romances. One, the game pushes you towards throughout, it has more content and the character is significantly more fleshed out than the other. That's were the imbalance lies. Not for people who've read the books or played the other games, but for those who haven't.

I agree that Yennefer's character is more fleshed out, but I disagree that the game pushes us towards her. Lots of characters in the game tell Geralt how horrible and manipulative Yen is (even her own daughter distrusts her) , while praising Triss. Also Triss has an advantage of being the first girl, whom player really gets to know. While Yennefer's real introduction happens much later in Skellige.
 
Top Bottom