Voted no. That's not to say the game couldn't use more work. I think all kinds of stuff could be fleshed out. And the newest interface was a "1 step forward, two steps back" kind of deal. More patches would be most welcome. Don't forget even TW2 continued to get content patches after its EE was released, so it's possible.
But EE has become shorthand for "fulfill all the community's every hope and dream," rather than the things that Enhanced Editions have traditionally been in the past. I submit to you that through the patches, DLC and expansions, TW3 as it currently stands has received an amount of new content, fixes, and "enhancement" equaling or even surpassing the Enhanced Editions of the previous games.
@
Sam2305 I don't think the fanbase is especially divisive on whether the game could use more work. I think rather the specific issues some people cry out as missing or unsatisfying, others have no problem with. So as long as we use EE as a shorthand for every possible wish, hope and dream it will continue to provoke opposite reactions from players. Iorveth and Devil's Pit matter more to some people, interface and skill balance issues matter more to others.
Exactly what I've been saying on the other 439 E.E. threads. Every single person has a very different idea of what needs to be fixed, and no matter how many years C.D.P.R. spent trying to fix everything for everyone, people would still be complaining about one thing or another.
There's no pleasing everybody.
---------- Updated at 03:25 AM ----------
But CDRP should do what we users want tbh! We buy their games, we decide if their games are bad or good!
We give them a feedback! I mean that's also the purpose of this Forum, isn't it?
Dangerous and unhealthy logic.
I know Sam, my point was - if you'd ask the fans what should CDPR prioritize, you'd get very conflicting answers.
That is the crux of the matter. All E.E. problems stem from that. The larger a game you make, the more fans you have (Which means more opinions on what's wrong.), and the more "problems" arise. An E.E. for an AAA title is pretty much out of the quesiton.
Would be something else, but i am pretty sure that developing Gwent was taking some resources and time...resources for other....maybe more important things.....:sofa:
Everyone has a different idea of what should be prioritized over other things.
People are rational (at least, the majority of us). I would fucking love to see Iorveth in TW3 with one or two quest but I'm willing to sacrifice in order to get a decent story: create decent politics, fix the holes of Act2 and 3 or the graphics. Give a proper conclusion to the scoia'tel like they did with the Order of the Flaming Rose (which no one asked)
If they fixed the things you mentioned, would you continue to ask for Iorveth content? I'm getting mixed signals from your post.
Alright man. In that case I'll still abstain from voting because I feel like you gave us a false choice between "this game literally needs more work to make it not suck" or "the game is perfect already and I hate new content."
That's essentially what this thread boils down to.
It doesn't sucks, but it's far from what was promised
What was promised?
Note: no offense, but I won't be going to any other threads for an answer to that question, so don't bother linking to them.
I totally like this game, and respect the design or artistic view they had/have, I really do, but in my opinion, the absence of Iorveth it's just too obvious,
it's a very large hole in this boat to ignore, I mean, Vernon Roche and Ves are in the game, and it's perfectly fine that they are, I was very happy so see them again
(I´m happy to see them in each new playthrough) but what about Iorveth? such meaningful and unique character, and a very important character in the previous game!, bue he is not there.
I think we should keep this thread rational and realistic, I mean, 3000+ changes? not a chance, E3 graphics? not gonna happen,
but how about each one of us choose only one "item" to "fix"?
I choose to add Iorveth, what about you?
Every single person here (Quite literally.) has a VERY different idea of what needs to be "fixed". They could "fix" a million things, and still have just as many people complaining.
I wish I shared your optimism, but the Witcher 3 hype and all the three year wait + discussing it with other Witcher fans is enough for me for a lifetime, but I genuinely don't think Cyberpunk will beat Witcher, we will see if CP will be worth not getting a W3 EE.
Not with that attitude!
In all seriousness, though, try to play CP77 with an open mind. If you go in expecting/wanting it to suck, it's going to suck.
I don't understand your point, the forum was way more active a year ago, and by your own statement you declare that most people that walk out from a transformers movie would also say they were satisfied, can you elaborate more?
Considering how the Transformers franchise makes more and more money with every release, I think that could be argued.
^Don't forget the pre-launch downgrade threads (shutters).
Ahem.
"Shudders".
Main Characters still available in the post ending world!
I only just recently realized why they decided not to include this. If you had a post-ending world state, then you wouldn't be able to play the expansions or many of the quests after beating the game.
Take into account people on console are less likely to get on their computer to make statements about the game and the fact that Steam has forums too. Would you expect a million people who hated the game to make an account on a forum just to express themselves?
Let's look at some hard facts.
1. Highest number of critic GotY awards of any game ever made.
2. Highest number of fan GotY awards of any game ever made.
3. Higher number of over-all GotY awards of any game ever made.
4. Highest rated video game ever made.
5. Second expansion is considered 13th greatest video game ever made (Might have moved up, since the last time I checked (A couple months ago, I think.).).
Those are hard facts. No offense, but what you're using to support your argument is a mish-mash of conjecture and hypotheticals.
Of the millions of people who think CoD sucks, how many of them do you think say so on the forums about it?
Actually, CoD-bashing is one of the internet's favorite past-time's.
In the interests of your last three words i'll decline from shooting holes in this gossamer thin logic.
That was very funny.
:cheers:
