...in order to be competitive ... must copy...
The ugly truth about every online games nowadays, not just Gwent. Event in an offline single player game where there is no need to be competitive people still looking for the best build to play .
That's the whole problem with F2P games: they create an environment where all players care about is winning. Playing "casual" mode, which luckily isn't dead like most online card games, you STILL encounter decks like alchemy and GS. It's quite frustrating. The mode is populated by grinders who don't care about.
Seriously, "casual mode" should have the option to blacklist several leaders or decks with certain cards in 'em. It's perfectly possible to program such a mode. This would satisfy all the Shupe, Nova and GS-haters, and would result in a much happier community. If you hate nekkers, they shouldn't make you play them on casual. Sure, you can scoop when you see the deck, but that just encourages them as they gain free in-game currency.
Aside from this widespread "cardgame" disease, Gwent does a good job to make all cards somewhat playable. You rarely see that.
Exactly!Well, this blacklisting system sounds good on paper, but it would be easy to abuse by the very same people you try to protect against.
I agree here. I pay to rank 19 every season then quit due to the netdecking. I can proudly say since the beginning of gwent i've never played with another person's deck. I love skellige but refuse to play greats words, I also don't play any noobgaurd decks either because they are the worst aspects of gwent.While I don't like playing against top tier decks in casual all the time, it's good to have them, to see how any new deck I try fares against them in a non-competitive environment, without getting punished for the loss.
What could satisfy both parties is the option to choose potential leaders/factions/cards something when you go into matchmaking, like you said, blacklisting. You could train against specific matchups if you waited long enough for the time it'd take to find a match too. That'd be a nice thing to have
At the expense of sounding selfish: I just don't care. They ruin a game mode that should and could be fun.P/s: Those who play tier 1 deck on casual maybe they are new to the deck and are learning it or they just do their daily quest, btw loosing in casual mode cost you nothing so why don't you just show them mercy by forfeit. When i play casual, if i face a deck i know that i can not beat, i forfeit immediately and move on to the next match, just to save my time. I usually practice tier 1 deck on casual until i know exactly what card left on my deck, i then switch to rank mode.
Warning: somewhat heated arguments follow, but they're not aimed against you but rather against the phenomena. Also I do realize it's just my own take on the subject and different perceptions exist.
At the expense of sounding selfish: I just don't care. They ruin a game mode that should and could be fun.
I also can't support these arguments.
Casual has minimal practice value because of the diversity of deck power and player skill you face there. If you don't care about your opposition and just want to see how your deck plays out, you could just go a couple rounds against the AI and don't ruin someone else's game in the process. But I usually just build up my new ranked decks in ranked and suck up a couple of defeats because of my inexperience and untuned deck. I think it's the only effective way to learn and optimize and also I don't have to screw with others while doing it.
I understand the reasons for the daily wins, still I can't say that's healthy. I really hope most players won't find pleasure in an unbalanced match on either side of the board (and I have no respect for those who do ), so if you're just wasting your time playing unfun matches to complete some goal the game sets to you, you should really be considering whether you're spending your free time the best possible way. Besides collecting a couple wins without playing the top 5-10 ladder decks isn't that hard (and would be even easier with no tier1 decks there ).
So no I won't show these people mercy or any other positive emotion, but rather try to put up a good fight and then don't good game even if I manage to beat them somehow (not that it matters too much). And reserve my mercy for people in a bad situation rather than those who put me and others into one.
Although you're right, I would probably have more fun if I'd just forfeit against these tier 1 decks on casual. I just don't like going down without a fight and also don't want to help those who are willing to ruin the game mode for their easy wins. But that's my disease and at least nobody else has to suffer because of it other than me.
Sadly I have no idea to help with the problem that wouldn't be an asshole move (like starting a campaign of "rope against tier 1 decks on casual" to screw them back ).
this season i didnt bother to get above 19 too, sick of pointspamI agree here. I pay to rank 19 every season then quit due to the netdecking. I can proudly say since the beginning of gwent i've never played with another person's deck. I love skellige but refuse to play greats words, I also don't play any noobgaurd decks either because they are the worst aspects of gwent.