It's always nice to hear about improvements in performance, regardless of system specs.
I'm wondering, is there a reason why you haven't upgraded to SSDs, yet?
I'm wondering, is there a reason why you haven't upgraded to SSDs, yet?
I have a I7 13700k and I am looking at getting a GPU, what would you say I should get for OD 1440p 60fps native
Cries in a 12 year old Xeon e5 2665 v1 , RTX 3060 and 32GB ram. If in Night City fps is somewhat playable (~40 at 1080 high or 4k with DLSS) then in Dogtown it turns into a slideshow : i get mostly 20-30 fps with drops to 10 fps in some cases and crashes.
I remember when i had a GTX 1060 with same Xeon e5 2665 v1 , and 32GB ram and game was running much more smoother than now.
Post automatically merged:
I remember when i had a GTX 1060 with same Xeon e5 2665 v1 , and 32GB ram and game was running much more smoother than now.
Depends on which generation you want, for raw performance get a 3080 but if you want DLSS 3 then go for the 4070 (not the to version) because it's the best of the 40 series where you get performance and value.
I have a 1660 ti now (Using it from my old system) so I feel that lmao
Post automatically merged:
I want something that can do Path Tracing, max settings, Native 1440 60FPS (DLSS 3 Frame Gen to 100+fps), I am looking at the 4070 but I dont think it will be good enough, and I dont know if I should wait for the 40 series refresh (I am using a 1660ti now)
I'm that case go for an overclocked 4070, Asus sells those, otherwise you're gonna get ripped off with anything beyond that. I have the 4070 OC edition and I never had issues with any game and cyberpunk isn't an exception either.
What CPU do you get and what is your performace at 1440p Native max settinings Path Tracing, Ray reconstruction?
The one I just bought was the 13900k, it's an i9 (the 14th series is a ripoff). I play at 1440p normally at 144fps but it can go down to 100 on certain places in night city, like Dogtown, which is an optimization of the game itself not about the rig. Also I don't use path tracing, that tech is still in diapers and needs more improvement.
Okay, like I said I am on the I7 13700k, so from what I see they are very close in gaming performance, but what I also noticed is that the rumered price from a lot of sources says that the 4070 super will cost about 699 USD, which is only 100 more than the 4070 adn 100 less than the 4070 ti yet sharing the same chip and vram as the 4080 but lower cores, dont know if I should wait for that, (And here in sweden we pay like 760 USD for a 4070 and about 1075 USD for a 4070 ti) so I don't know what to get cause I want to do Path Tracing at 1440p Native 60 FPS minumen
Native 1440p with maxes out settings at 60 fps will be hard. I get around that on a 4090 (upscale it too 4k) and with Fg and all the goodies i get 70-120 fps depending on what i do. The upscale is ofc costing some fps but its a really hard game too run. Im swedish too so know the pain of overpaying for hardware..
I can test some when i get home from work @ 1440p
Post automatically merged:
Wow i was totally wrong. Averaged 80-90 fps at 1440p with maxed out settings, no RR since you need DLSS on for it to work. Over 120 with quality DLSS. Vram usage was around 12 gb usage tho so need something with atleast 12gb vram id say preferebly 16..
Last edited:
Thank you so much, sorry for the late reply, had some stuf to do. Do you think I should be fine for I want if I wait for the refresh of the 40 series and go with the 4070 super?
Forget about Ray Tracing if you want to play on native resolution. The benefits that native resolution may have over upscaling are negligible, at least from an economical point of view.
Post automatically merged:
I'd give it a try. If you encounter textures not loading or NPCs reacting too slow, you know the reason why. Make sure to make some manual saves along your way.
Last edited:
there are a few GPU’s that can get what I want just not sure what they are, and people who have a “hyphened” sense of quality can notice DLSS upscaling like my self
Hmm the super might work. But at native it wont run at 60 i think, the 4090 is around 50% faster and that would give around 45 fps i think. If you wanna be sure i would say 4080 is the sweetspot. Expencive tho... the amont of RT cores and tensor also affect performance on these settings.
I would wait for RTX 50**. Doubt the refresh will bring noticeable improvements.
From the leaked specs besides the 4070 ti super and and the 4070 super, nothing is intreasting.
the 4070 ti super is the best card in the 4000 series if it indeed comes out in 700$ and the same specs that were leaked (16 gigs of ram 256bit bus).
The 4080 super supposedly will come at 999$ and it will be basically a slightly improved 4080, which is still too expansive if u ask me, I do own a 4080 and I payed around 1100$ for this card.
Nvidia are afraid that the AI bubble is going to collapse so they are throwing some bones in gamers direction, gamers shouldn't buy their overpriced cards and let them rot on shelves, until they give a decent price to performance.
want a 999$-1100$ for a 4080, no problem increase the Vram and the BUS. if the 4080 super was 20 gigs of vram and a bigger bus, then a 999$ was far more justified.
As I see it now, if u don't use your GPU for rendering or play in NVidia favored titles that use RTX (Games like cyberpunk) then Intel and AMD look like better and cheaper alternatives.
If nvidia really was pro gamers, then they would have did a 4060 super series. since most gamers buy the 60 series.
the 4060 super at 12 gigs of Vram at 250-299$ would have been a hit.
The 4060 ti super at 16 Vram and 192 bit but would have also been a sell out in 350-399$