but why should poeple calm down with veil? poison is still played a lot. He was also played in any NG deck before veil even was a thing.
I am not saying he needs a big nerf, but just a smal utility adjustment. my idea would be to remove the aristocrat, but that may be to harsh. (only target neg. status has been sugested a lot here)
I think if you play Ball, you should not be incentivized to also play Vincent, since you already have poison as your removal option.
If you play Ball and Vincent, as someone who does exactly this...that's a loooooot of provision used up in deck construction for 2 cards as is - which leaves less room in the deck for other powerful golds.
Removing the Aristocrat tag is okay, I mean it's probably the least impactful nerf ever, just a small tweak to Ball+Vincent. Actually, for my deck it would probably be a net buff since I can Roderick or Joachim out Vincent without triggering a the 3rd phase of Ball.
I don't think people should calm down with Veil, but they have to realize that Veil needs weaknesses and right now, Veiled units can be tall removed or reset. That's it. No locks, no poisons, no bleeds. Only raw damage or destroy effects are viable vs those cards, which are mostly engines so most non-tall removal won't work.
Therefore, imo, the very threat of Vincent is good because it means if you haphazardly play a high value veil card, you can be punished for it.