i agree, and fix the million problems that TW3 still has (i'll just leave this here:http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/50606-Petition-for-the-quot-Enhanced-edition-quot-aka-Legacy-for-the-ages)
Overall, it's quite good, but I think some people had an issue with the odd mixture of American and English voices. I can recall a few peasant women who sounded like they were from Kansas -- but perhaps that was intentional.
Blinky teleported Kansas peasantry to Lakeside.
So that's how the innkeeper knew about her . . . .sneaky Blinky, very sneaky.
Some games don't age well, and some.. well, they're like Witcher.
Yeah,TW1 is still beautiful.I'm afraid if they do a remaster,the game will lose the slavic atmosphere,which TW2 and TW3 lack.I don't need remastered W1...
That is something to be worried about if a remaster was to be made (which I doubt), it is not unlikely that the game would be modified in a number of ways to appeal to a wider audience and console users, it could be censored, gameplay elements removed or simplified, etc.
Well we wouldn't know for sure, it's going to be hard to keep the key elements of the game if a different segment of audience is the target, but it's still possible. And I'm still curious how it's going to work. You might already know that in movies there are two types of adaptation, which is a "remake" and a "reboot". A remake is more or less like the predecessor with a face lift, while a reboot is taking the same concept, universe, character, but could be a totally different thing. I'm not totally against both, but I would prefer a "remake", which is closer to a "remastered", than a reboot. But again, we can't be sure until then (and if it is going to happen, which like what you said, it's unlikely to happen).
