Thanks for asking. Technically, my degree and reading are in Mediaeval Studies, but, as of late, the pursuit has become more of a hobby -- so, at present, both.Phinnway;n7334450 said:If I might ask, are you a legitimate medievalist? Or a hobbyist one?
Obviously, you have many considerate and deeply compassionate friends. Either that, or they're all witchers . . . .M4xw0lf;n7353470 said:I got red wine, white wine, liquor, gin...
Alcohol and headaches are most certainly unrelated, yes.Sunsibar;n7353840 said:If I drink wine, head ache is the first one that kills me. Not the alcohol![]()
Family and wife - no witchering at all there. I think I stand by my first hypothesis.Riven-Twain;n7354900 said:Obviously, you have many considerate and deeply compassionate friends. Either that, or they're all witchers . . . .
Nice. I, myself, am a hobbyist medievalist. I've studied medieval history on and off through the years. Last semester I wrote quite a few papers about Irish monasteries just for fun. I learned quite a bit from my research.Riven-Twain;n7353090 said:Thanks for asking. Technically, my degree and reading are in Mediaeval Studies, but, as of late, the pursuit has become more of a hobby -- so, at present, both.!
Are you quite certain about that? Weren't you the one who had your wedding in the Swamp Forest near Vizima, complete with drowners and ribbons?M4xw0lf;n7360150 said:Family and wife - no witchering at all there.
Commendable interests, and very pragmatic perspective on a career! Sadly, it is indeed true that the Humanities are generally undervalued on the market -- since, as you rightly observe, the worth of knowledge is rather difficult to quantify. Personally, my studies in heroic literature (legends, myths, romances, etc.) stemmed not from any occupational prospects -- which are very few -- but because I genuinely enjoy contemplating and meditating upon the material. I hope you shall still be able to pursue your mediaeval interests, while earning a decent living -- which is, after all, rather handy!Phinnway;n7361370 said:Nice. I, myself, am a hobbyist medievalist. I've studied medieval history on and off through the years. Last semester I wrote quite a few papers about Irish monasteries just for fun. I learned quite a bit from my research.
I've wanted to study medieval history since highschool. But I never did because humanities isn't very marketable. After many years, I finally decided to go to school for a STEM degree instead. I figure earning a stable income matters more for happiness than following your passion. Besides, being a true intellectual comes from a lifetime devoted to the pursuit of knowledge, rather than from a degree. As Plutarch said, "The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled."
Not to go into the whole discourse on how different religions view scientific knowledge, evolution is a verifiable process, so it's pretty hard to dispute its existence. Sensible religious thinkers usually dispute not its existence, but theory of evolution of all species from common primitive ancestry like microorganisms and etc. I.e. while mutations or other forms of species evolution are verifiable (example), theory of for example evolution of consciousness / intelligence from micro-organic life forms is easily disputable.volsung;n7361510 said:I am shocked and mind blown at their views of the world, their prejudice against science and lack of understanding of elementary concepts in, say, evolution.
Really? I've probably forgotten that. I just remember the cat memes and other bullshittery.volsung;n7363700 said:Now about the hairy Bear, this place used to be full of interesting topics, not just spam![]()
Indeed. Here religious method differs from at least common scientific method. As Kuzari put it, philosopher (in his terms, referring to school of rational philosophy, or in this context, someone using the scientific method), has to get from observations to the source. While sages (i.e. religious thinkers), have to get from the source to observations.volsung;n7363700 said:Ultimately the issue is not whether everything we perceive has already been explained, but what kind of explanations we are looking for. The ones that suggest or depend on external input from an unexplainable/unverifiable source are simply not admissible in science, because they don't explain anything and require subscribing to an ideology. They might still be worth pursuing for other reasons though.
Ordered some Japanese textbooks and everything was in order including the audio CDs that came with the books. And I ordered them from Amazon JP because even after the shipping costs and taxes they were still much cheaper than ordering from within EU.volsung;n7364640 said:Looks really beaten. Hope you ordered pillows or towels and not electronics.
Also, Japan!?
I tend to have a slightly different experience: 'Is there any way you could show up earlier, and then also stay later?'Sunsibar;n7376240 said:B: Is it anyway possible that you could come to work few hours later, because we need to work longer today? Pretty please, if just possible? Please? Please?