Same.Even if we can only see our character in cutscenes or picture mode, i still would love to customize the high F- out of him/her.
Same.Even if we can only see our character in cutscenes or picture mode, i still would love to customize the high F- out of him/her.
Railguns... exist in CP2020 and laser weapons. Yes. As support and small arms. What are you even talking about?I'll repeat myself.
Power source.
Railguns and space lasers still require a power source. And currently physics, and it's subfield chemistry, don't show much promise for the development of power sources small enough to be portable.
Sure, you can put a laser on a ship ... have you ever seen how large a ships engines are?
As I recall all but the first of those comes from supplements of somewhat dubious nature.Railguns... exist in CP2020 and laser weapons. Yes. As support and small arms. What are you even talking about?
So the possibility of advancement of an already combat valid technology 50 years in the future is somehow not possible because?As I recall all but the first of those comes from supplements of somewhat dubious nature.
And the first requires an exoskeleton which has the ability to carry a heavy bulky power source, hardly man-portable.
If you wish to include any and everything ever published then this discussion is pointless.
depends on what happened in the interveaning years. could of been abandoned if they couldn't improve the power supply or the size, stuff gets abandoned all the time. or just takes way longer to get right than expected.So the possibility of advancement of an already combat valid technology 50 years in the future is somehow not possible because?
Plausible. But the reverse is also just as plausible and in no way "unrealistic" or impossible.depends on what happened in the interveaning years. could of been abandoned if they couldn't improve the power supply or the size, stuff gets abandoned all the time. or just takes way longer to get right than expected.
Aaah yes, that one scene where Ciri mentions a world like Cyberpunk.. It's preety famous around here.. Well.. More like infamous.CP 2077 is described after the 2:40 mark
Making mass drivers (AKA Gauss weapons) is pretty easy, the power needed to operate them is another matter entirely. Don't confuse one part of a technology with the whole thing.So the possibility of advancement of an already combat valid technology 50 years in the future is somehow not possible because?
A slant I see on this, is Corpo capitalism driving an artificial need. We see it in the modern world right now with big oil where renewables, and Nuclear technology are safer, cleaner, cheaper and more efficient.Making mass drivers (AKA Gauss weapons) is pretty easy, the power needed to operate them is another matter entirely. Don't confuse one part of a technology with the whole thing.
Let's take something easy to show why energy storage technology hasn't gotten even close to improving as much as it would have to.
CHOO2
If they have power cells/batteries efficient and small enough for man-portable weapons why do they use CHOO2? Electric vehicles are far more efficient to "fuel", far more eco friendly, and if mass produced cheaper to maintain (and probably build).
The answer is probably the same in that fictitious world as it is in ours: Corporation interests.If they have power cells/batteries efficient and small enough for man-portable weapons why do they use CHOO2? Electric vehicles are far more efficient to "fuel", far more eco friendly, and if mass produced cheaper to maintain (and probably build)
I could buy this, as I watch it in action daily. Corporations produce technology advanced enough to increase efficiency drastically...then make it so proprietary and expensive that no one can afford to use it. Especially, not the industries that could benefit from it the most. And/or, they want to continue milking existing markets until they've been squeezed dry.The answer is probably the same in that fictitious world as it is in ours: Corporation interests.
This one we might be able to explain away simply as the need for max power up front. I'd imagine most vehicles would be hybrids of a sort. They do use "batteries" for some functions, but if I slam my foot down on the gas pedal, that CHOO2 provides the upfront burst of torque I need.If they have power cells/batteries efficient and small enough for man-portable weapons why do they use CHOO2? Electric vehicles are far more efficient to "fuel", far more eco friendly, and if mass produced cheaper to maintain (and probably build).
i would disagree strongly, one must only look at tesla's "insane mode" that can out accelerate most any vehicle. it can hit 0-60 in 1.9 secondsI could buy this, as I watch it in action daily. Corporations produce technology advanced enough to increase efficiency drastically...then make it so proprietary and expensive that no one can afford to use it. Especially, not the industries that could benefit from it the most. And/or, they want to continue milking existing markets until they've been squeezed dry.
It doesn't make logical sense. It's totally counter-productive. It's pure greed. That sounds like Cyberpunk already, from what little I know!
This one we might be able to explain away simply as the need for max power up front. I'd imagine most vehicles would be hybrids of a sort. They do use "batteries" for some functions, but if I slam my foot down on the gas pedal, that CHOO2 provides the upfront burst of torque I need.
electric motors have vastly more torque than any combustion engine, not least because they can be right at the wheel, but also because it's jsut all there, no putting your foot down needed. the advantage of hybrid engines right now is range.This one we might be able to explain away simply as the need for max power up front. I'd imagine most vehicles would be hybrids of a sort. They do use "batteries" for some functions, but if I slam my foot down on the gas pedal, that CHOO2 provides the upfront burst of torque I need.
agreed, and if you think about it, 20 years ago the best battery on the market was AAA batteries, which near every phone used, now we have lithium ion and even better industrial ones that can both fully recharge in seconds and last a hecka-long time, some even can power whole carselectric motors have vastly more torque than any combustion engine, not least because they can be right at the wheel, but also because it's jsut all there, no putting your foot down needed. the advantage of hybrid engines right now is range.
I know there that at the current tech level there are no viable energy solutions for a small-ish, working (armor-piercing) elecromagnetic weapon.. though there are some that can pierce softer materials like wood. But that's beside the point, because there clearly are in CP2020.I give up.
Believe what you want.
I'll go with Physics/Chemistry.
lol, I saw a video where someone made a nerf dart shoot through 2inch plywood and break the sound barrier, if that's possible in 2019, then efficient high-powered electric portable batteries are definitely viable in 2077I know there that at the current tech level there are no viable energy solutions for a small-ish, working (armor-piercing) elecromagnetic weapon.. though there are some that can pierce softer materials like wood. But that's beside the point, because there clearly are in CP2020.
And if those are the kinds of videos you watch for your science "facts" well... good luck with that.
Since the guy making these has a PhD and his channel consists primarily of debunking B.S. pseudo "science" ... I'll stick with my assertions.And if those are the kinds of videos you watch for your science "facts" well.. good luck with that.
CDPR doesn't have to justify it in any detail. We have no way of knowing how power systems will work in a speculative 2077 and nothing suggested here is defying physics.But arguing pseudo-science specifics between fictitious universes is like arguing power levels between Superman and Goku. Fun.. In a way. But ultimately pointless.