What should we bring back from Witcher 1 to Witcher 2
First thank you for taking the time to read this post,now on to the discussion.
/>
1. I would like to see Witcher 1 combat system in Witcher 3.Let me explain.In 1st part we had 3 styles that were also slightly different depending on the blade you used(silver or steel).This added some variety to fighting your opponents since you wouldnt see the same move over and over and start the combat with the same move over and over like in Witcher 2.Also the sword fighting in Witcher 1 was more flashy.Seeing Geralt wield a blade so fast you could barely see it,doing evasions,pirrouetes,parry and for example doing a backflip with a blade doing the upper cut motion gave the feel that Geralt was really was a swordsman to be feared and that no one could match him.On the other hand in Witcher 2 you just have fast and heavy attacks which I found very boring,because soon I got tired of clicking my mouse a thousand times in each fight,I missed how automated it was in Witcher 1.While I welcomed the block action,riposte and dodge I still felt like they were wanting,and I would still vote in favor of evasive moves from Witcher 1.Well that would be it on the combat system,I could go into more depth but that would serve no purpose.
2.I found the story in Witcher 2 very short compared to Witcher 1.I felt that developers focused much more on graphics than they did on the story since the time needed to complete Witcher 2 is about 1/4 to 1/3 of time needed for Witcher 1.And I must say I was very disappointed by this.Not that I didnt enjoy the Witcher 2 story line,but it ended too quickly and I would like them to work more on the story in 3rd part than on the graphics.This brings me to issue number 3.
3.Graphics.I remember when I 1st played Witcher 1 it was on the old Radeon x550 graphic card(it was some 3-4 years old when Witcher 1 came out) with the lowest possible setting.And even though it would sometimes take as much as 15-20 min to load between major areas I still completed the game three times on it.That is how good the game was.
/> Later I updated to Geforce gtx8600 about a year before the witcher 2 came out.I was aware that my card wasnt really good,but I hoped I could be able to play Witcher 2 on low with it.I was very angry when I got to the point where I needed to lower my resolution to 800x640 to be able to barely play the game with huge lags,not to mention than none of the books were readable on that resolution.Still I somehow completed the game.Now I have Geforce gtx660 and I am able to play Witcher 2 on highest setting with around 25-40 fps which is okay.But now I heard the think about creating a graphic power monster out of Witcher 3.And that worries me.It is said that you will need a terminator for a machine to be able to play it.I do not welcome that.As much as I love the series I do not want to spend another 600-800 euros on upgrading my pc just so I can play this one game(I updated my pc to its current hardware about 8 months ago and it cost me 600 euros). I just dont have that kind of cash to throw around.So I beg the developers to focus more on the story.Because it is the story that made the Witcher my favorite game not the super high and flashy graphics.So please remember your faithful fans and give us a game that we can play and enjoy,not a game that we will have to wait 2 years of money saving to be able to play it.
Thank you all again for reading this post and I hope you will support at least one of the issues in it.
First thank you for taking the time to read this post,now on to the discussion.
1. I would like to see Witcher 1 combat system in Witcher 3.Let me explain.In 1st part we had 3 styles that were also slightly different depending on the blade you used(silver or steel).This added some variety to fighting your opponents since you wouldnt see the same move over and over and start the combat with the same move over and over like in Witcher 2.Also the sword fighting in Witcher 1 was more flashy.Seeing Geralt wield a blade so fast you could barely see it,doing evasions,pirrouetes,parry and for example doing a backflip with a blade doing the upper cut motion gave the feel that Geralt was really was a swordsman to be feared and that no one could match him.On the other hand in Witcher 2 you just have fast and heavy attacks which I found very boring,because soon I got tired of clicking my mouse a thousand times in each fight,I missed how automated it was in Witcher 1.While I welcomed the block action,riposte and dodge I still felt like they were wanting,and I would still vote in favor of evasive moves from Witcher 1.Well that would be it on the combat system,I could go into more depth but that would serve no purpose.
2.I found the story in Witcher 2 very short compared to Witcher 1.I felt that developers focused much more on graphics than they did on the story since the time needed to complete Witcher 2 is about 1/4 to 1/3 of time needed for Witcher 1.And I must say I was very disappointed by this.Not that I didnt enjoy the Witcher 2 story line,but it ended too quickly and I would like them to work more on the story in 3rd part than on the graphics.This brings me to issue number 3.
3.Graphics.I remember when I 1st played Witcher 1 it was on the old Radeon x550 graphic card(it was some 3-4 years old when Witcher 1 came out) with the lowest possible setting.And even though it would sometimes take as much as 15-20 min to load between major areas I still completed the game three times on it.That is how good the game was.
Thank you all again for reading this post and I hope you will support at least one of the issues in it.


