The only thing CDPR should take from Crytek is NG+ and they all but flat out said no to that so...
Blah
Blah
what, Ryse?MM360 said:This game looks amazing. Honestly I can't wait to play it
It looks good and apparently the main campaign will also have gods taking sides in the conflict but in a much subtler way than, say, god of war.
But I am biased because Civis Romanus Sum
I'm a huge God of War fan and I love ancient Rome so this game is shaping up to be something really special for meHicSuntDracones said:what, Ryse?
It looks good and apparently the main campaign will also have gods taking sides in the conflict but in a much subtler way than, say, god of war.
But I am biased because Civis Romanus Sum
well then you should know that they hired a historian that specialized in Roman warfare to teach the mocap actors how to fight like roman soldiers (note all main actors are theatre/stage actors...which is a plus).MM360 said:I'm a huge God of War fan and I love ancient Rome so this game is shaping up to be something really special for me
The game is partly historically accurate too as it takes place during Nero's reign and specifically during the revolt in Britain. Historical characters will make an appearance too (like the female leader of the gauls and such).
it will be one of my day one purchases....but that said the only thing I would ever want CDPR to look at and take from this game would be the NG+ function (and maybe the gladii)
Been following this game since I saw the first trailer at Microsoft Conference - day 1 purchase for me as wellHicSuntDracones said:
I am glad to hear that. I dislike the fact that so many people mindlessly rash on it for no better reason, apparently, that it is an Xbox One exclusive and, at the time, everyone was hating the Xbox One.MM360 said:Been following this game since I saw the first trailer at Microsoft Conference - day 1 purchase for me as well
The game has great potential.
MM360 said:This game looks amazing. Honestly I can't wait to play it
So... Everyone blaming on me for my post and actually CDPR likes the game!! ahah that's a gratification. Thanks CDPR !
Well, it's my opinion - not whole company's, but there are some people other than me, who are very excited about this projectAvydia1 said:
yes but Ipse Dicsit is a powerful argumentMM360 said:Well, it's my opinion - not whole company's
MM360 said:but there are some people other than me, who are very excited about this project
well... that's an "illi dixerunt" ...
p.s. singular: ipse dixit
I gave you your reputation back. I think one should only negative rep if the user posts something that's mean. Then again usually the mods tend to that. Anyway, I still stand with my point. Ryse is just a totally different game with a different time setting as well. Despite The Witcher world being a fantasy world. Fantasy is comparable to cultures around 1400- 1700.Avydia1 said:
Mine was just a proposition, to be discussed here. Then a lot of rage and "fundamentalism" came out. I'm glad CDPR restored some balance.
Anyway, arrogance and know-it-all attitude make people misunderstand other poeple's thoughts.
I never said TW3 combat should be identical to Ryse combat. I just pointed out that IF cdprojekt manages to make TW3 combat strategical AND emotional engaging, that would be awesome.
But I'm no hardcore gamer, I don't like Dark Souls and many other hardcore RPG, so maybe I have no right to talk.
Anyway, arrogance and know-it-all attitude make people misunderstand other poeple's thoughts.
I never said TW3 combat should be identical to Ryse combat. I just pointed out that IF cdprojekt manages to make TW3 combat strategical AND emotional engaging, that would be awesome.
But I'm no hardcore gamer, I don't like Dark Souls and many other hardcore RPG, so maybe I have no right to talk.
Pretty sure people aren't too much into the game because of the QTE-filled combat mostly.HicSuntDracones said:
I'd say that's a legit reason.
@Avydia1 Just because a member of the CDPR staff likes a game doesn't mean features from said game should definitely be implemented in TW3.
oh BULL**** there is no more QTE (which are not QTE really) in that game than there are in Batman Arkham City (button prompts were also removed) the combat system of which is ALWAYS lauded in every single review. If you played the game you know this to be true.ReptilePZ said:
So legitimate my ass
I dunno, from what I've seen it's pretty QTE-heavy. The worst part is that, unlike in Batman games, the QTE's in Ryse seem to immediately trigger a killing blow - something that doesn't happen in the Batman series. It's more like the 'I win' combat in AC.HicSuntDracones said:
HicSuntDracones said:
Whaiiit wha?
Take your words back about arkham games, or batman will hunt you down!(i meant affleck)
Sooo arkham city has a qte combat...i played the game and asylum too,but it looks you did not( actually every game has a qte combat by your description...)
Also You know that TW2 combat was inspired partly from arkham asylum right?
not anymore they do not, now they work pretty much like Batman AC including the mandatory timing for effective blocks.ReptilePZ said:
If you watch the last 2 vidocs you can see this