Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
  • STORY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 THE WITCHER TALES
  • GAMEPLAY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 MODS (THE WITCHER) MODS (THE WITCHER 2) MODS (THE WITCHER 3)
  • TECHNICAL
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 (PC) THE WITCHER 2 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (PC) THE WITCHER 3 (PLAYSTATION) THE WITCHER 3 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (SWITCH)
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
Menu

Register

Which is the most important aspect of Witcher 2?

+
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
S

salad10203

Forum regular
#1
Feb 6, 2011
Which is the most important aspect of Witcher 2?

If you had to sacrifice one in terms of quality which would you sacrifice?StoryRPG ElementsAction ElementsLengthUI & PC specific features :Support for triple monitor, mod support etc.GraphicsPersonally, I would sacrifice the RPG elements. Call me crazy, but as long as the game is balanced, an action game is as much for me. The last thing I would sacrifice would be the story, then graphics, then length, then PC specific features.
 
E

e-ahmet.823

Senior user
#2
Feb 6, 2011
Only graphics out of all those. I first thought about UI but I know I sometimes get irked from a game just taking a look at its UI.
 
S

Seeker.217

Ex-moderator
#3
Feb 7, 2011
UI & PC specific features :Support for triple monitor, mod support etc.GraphicsAs much as I like good Graphics if your dont have the other things in a game there no point in playing it IMO
 
fchopin

fchopin

Forum veteran
#4
Feb 7, 2011
If you take the RPG elements out of an RPG then you have no RPG game.Seems to me you don't want to play RPG games but just action games.
 
S

salad10203

Forum regular
#5
Feb 8, 2011
fchopin said:
If you take the RPG elements out of an RPG then you have no RPG game.Seems to me you don't want to play RPG games but just action games.
Click to expand...
The line between RPG and ACTION is getting thinner every day. Even the Witcher was a mix of the two. For me, and RPG is turn-based and an action is skill-based. If I had to choose, I would go with skill-based, just personal preference. And by the looks of it, Witcher 2 will probably allow me to play an action game with strategy involved, so best of both worlds.
 
Garrison72

Garrison72

Mentor
#6
Feb 8, 2011
This one's easy: graphics. All the other things are too important.
 
D

darksavior

Senior user
#7
Feb 8, 2011
For myself, it would be length (closely followed by graphics). If the story is compelling, then the length of the game does not matter to me. I usually play through a game to experience a story multiple times regardless.
 
S

salad10203

Forum regular
#8
Feb 8, 2011
Darksavior said:
For myself, it would be length (closely followed by graphics). If the story is compelling, then the length of the game does not matter to me. I usually play through a game to experience a story multiple times regardless.
Click to expand...
I used to play games multiple times through, but now that I am older and games offer so many options I usually just make my first time count.
 
N

netopier

Senior user
#9
Feb 8, 2011
Probably UI & PC specific features :Support for triple monitor, mod support etc.Then Action Elements (only if RPG Elements are done very well)Then GraphicsThese are the only things I can suffer. If anything else goes missing, I won't buy the game.
 
D

darksavior

Senior user
#10
Feb 8, 2011
@ Salad: For myself, being a stay at home mom to a 4 year old, the replay value is extremely important to me. For myself, a great replay value is equal to a great story. I mostly play RPGs. I tend to do everything that I can the first time, second time, third time, ect. Because my hard-drive decided to die, I am going through TW for the 15th time (from start to finish). I'm of the mind that if I pay $50-60 (US) for a game, then I want to play it more than 1 time.
 
S

salad10203

Forum regular
#11
Feb 8, 2011
Darksavior said:
@ Salad: For myself, being a stay at home mom to a 4 year old, the replay value is extremely important to me. For myself, a great replay value is equal to a great story. I mostly play RPGs. I tend to do everything that I can the first time, second time, third time, ect. Because my hard-drive decided to die, I am going through TW for the 15th time (from start to finish). I'm of the mind that if I pay $50-60 (US) for a game, then I want to play it more than 1 time.
Click to expand...
Wow thats impressive, I wish I had the passion to play more than once. I have tried playing games twice but I quickly start to wonder what other games are out and move on to the next. Recently installed TW but found myself distracted and bought Two Worlds 2.
 
P

petra_silie

Ex-moderator
#12
Feb 8, 2011
For me above all stands the replay value an that is story, RPG & action elements (and maybe length too).Good graphics and other tech trimmings are... well, actually I want to buy the game and not a new rig which enables me to play the game I want to buy :pStoryRPG ElementsAction ElementsLengthUI & PC specific features :Support for triple monitor, mod support etc.Graphics
 
S

Shreav

Senior user
#13
Feb 8, 2011
If I had to sacrifice any of those things then I wouldn't buy the game. The reason I decided to purchase Witcher 2 in the first place was because all those aspects appealed to me.I would basically have to reevaluate its worth to me, and I really don't know how that would go.
 
I

Irx

Senior user
#14
Feb 9, 2011
I'd never sacrifice -StoryRPG ElementsLength (=the amount of quality content)UI & PC specific features - I want a good PC-oriented interface, not some gaypad menus, but I don't care about support for triple monitor, mod support etc.I don't care about at all -GraphicsAction Elements
 
S

soldiergeralt

Forum veteran
#15
Feb 12, 2011
the most important aspect for me is the art. i guess that goes under graphics. i didn't buy witcher 1 because i wasn't a fan of the art direction. it seemed still too young. i'm glad witcher 2 has taken the art in a completely different direction. those kaedwen soldiers are the epitome of good character design. just brilliant.i bought the game because of them.
 
S

salad10203

Forum regular
#16
Feb 12, 2011
seamusgod said:
the most important aspect for me is the art. i guess that goes under graphics. i didn't buy witcher 1 because i wasn't a fan of the art direction. it seemed still too young. i'm glad witcher 2 has taken the art in a completely different direction. those kaedwen soldiers are the epitome of good character design. just brilliant.i bought the game because of them.
Click to expand...
Interesting, the art was definitely not the best in the first but the unique universe sucked me in. It seems the TW2 will be the best of both worlds, hopefully.
 
H

hamenaglar

Senior user
#17
Feb 14, 2011
Irx said:
I'd never sacrifice -StoryRPG ElementsLength (=the amount of quality content)UI & PC specific features - I want a good PC-oriented interface, not some gaypad menus, but I don't care about support for triple monitor, mod support etc.I don't care about at all -GraphicsAction Elements
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more...
 
K

kojocel

Senior user
#18
Feb 15, 2011
Irx said:
I'd never sacrifice -StoryRPG ElementsLength (=the amount of quality content)UI & PC specific features - I want a good PC-oriented interface, not some gaypad menus, but I don't care about support for triple monitor, mod support etc.I don't care about at all -GraphicsAction Elements
Click to expand...
These, my friend, are Words of Wisdom.
 
P

pumpkin13

Senior user
#19
Feb 20, 2011
Mood, Music, and most important of all for me, MORAL AMBIGUITY. No other game IMO does this as well as The Witcher did. That and the decisions and consequences. Those two kinda went hand in hand.
 
G

GuyNwah

Ex-moderator
#20
Feb 21, 2011
Not so much moral ambiguity as moral dilemmas. It's a distinction I prefer to make, not even if everybody does. If there were any real question of whether the major villains of TW1 were actually in the right, or whether Geralt should execute justice upon them, that would be moral ambiguity. TW1 is not a morally ambiguous world in that sense. The decisions that present themselves in the game are instead moral dilemmas: questions of whether Geralt should excuse some evil to prevent another, or ally with evildoers to combat other villains.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.