ArianeGrosmont;n9471891 said:
Only if you care more about the ore than sending the message that you feel this wasn't a good game. The reason why it's a nice change is that if you don't click GG when you know the opponent has you're now saying "I didn't like the game enough to deny us both 5 ore in order to tell you that" Not clicking GG has more meaning. And you'll still get a message from the other player saying that they thought it was a GG.
If you've read any game theory it's pretty obvious that any system like the current GG system will quickly devolve into Prisoners Dilemma for many people. There are people clicking GG even when they didn't particularly think it was a GG because if everyone clicks GG most of the time, everyone is better off. So the situation of being forced to send GG most of the time already exists, just in a less overt fashion. As I said earlier that in an ideal world people would click GG if they thought it was a GG and for no other reason. But that's not what is happening now.
Personally I'd have never added ore to GG for exactly that reason. I'd have just upped the rewards for each tier slightly instead. As soon as you add a reward to GG, you're going to get people trying to game the system.
Or I'll get the message they care more about ore. It doesn't actually mean more, we're going round in circlesKarajorma;n9474521 said:
so if we have the option- as you're suggesting- to deny our opponent their ore if the don't send a GG back, in your ideal world a person who played a perfect game wouldn't get the reward because his opponent played a cheap deck and roped the whole game long? How is that ideal? You're basically saying: the system is flawed anyway, so let's maximize the flaws. I fail to see the logic in that.Karajorma;n9474521 said:
nothing wrong with the way things are: 1.no reason to increase daily rewards- they are quite generous. 2. Giving a tiny reward to an opponent because you want to is a very nice way of saying 'good game''.Karajorma;n9474521 said:
but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this point...
ArianeGrosmont;n9474851 said:
Which is the case now anyway.
But it does. How does "I dislike the way you play so much that you can stick your GG ore" not mean more?
You think someone who roped all game long is going to give you ore? They're not cause they know no one is going to give them ore due to their cheap tactics. So it's no change whatsoever.
How are the flaws being maximized? What would most likely happen is that people would start giving GG as often (cause they want the rewards). But if someone really upset you, they don't get the rewards. So when people who play cheap tactics play each other they do worse. Those of us who don't do better. That's what you want in a system of rewards for good play, isn't it? It's not ideal, but it's better than what we have now.
If you think you could simply remove the GG rewards and not have people complain, I really don't know which forum you're reading but it's not this one.
Not really, cause as you can see from this thread most people just automatically give GG unless there is something they hate about their opponents play style.
I GG everyone who isint a weather spamming monster <edit>.
Last edited by a moderator:
Not with new buffed drowners. It's just such a cheap and tacky deck to play against and they are all i seem to play in ranked. It's gotten very boring, tedious and repetitive.
Out of all the cool cards in this game i just cant understand why you would enjoy playing those garbage monster cards.
Out of all the cool cards in this game i just cant understand why you would enjoy playing those garbage monster cards.
so what's the point in changing it?
so only not sending a GG would mean anything... Pretty negative feel, I'd say...
again, what's the point of changing anything if you claim nothing would be different?
in what way? Those are precisely the people who would GG no matter what- if they only care about winning and not playing a good game, they will only care about the reward, and not about sending a message.
in what way? They're either playing against someone like them, in which case chances are they'd GG each other anyway, or they're playing against cheap netdeckers, in which case they either GG someone they feel didn't deserve it, or they themselves don't get a reward even though they did play a good game
never said I want to remove the GG reward system. In fact, I keep saying it's absolutely fine the way it is.
...so people send a 'good game'' unless they thought it was a bad game.. what a ludicrous system! (Hope the sarcasm came across)
Karajorma;n9477751 said:
Because it would change things for those of us who don't want a change: every time we play against someone like you, we'd be forced into your GG system. No thanks!
Firstly, I don't have an issue with not receiving ore if I've given it. I'm suggesting something for the people who aren't happy with the current GG system because they don't want to give ore to someone who won't send it.
Secondly, I doubt there would be much change overall in how much ore you'd get. Probably a slightly higher amount most likely.
Secondly, I doubt there would be much change overall in how much ore you'd get. Probably a slightly higher amount most likely.
I'm not gg, I'm beginner 
That is something like PoE? but with Cards?
I can sell exalted orbs for some good cards in gwent, if you need buy PoE currency
there is good PoE Shop https://odealo.com/games/path-of-exile/
That is something like PoE? but with Cards?
I can sell exalted orbs for some good cards in gwent, if you need buy PoE currency
there is good PoE Shop https://odealo.com/games/path-of-exile/
Last edited:
Just ran into a BM and emote spammer, no GG for him. And almost every player I lose to ends the game with a thanks. An emote HS get rid off for obvious reasons. Players that use this emotes never get a GG from me. I hope the HS <edit> community does not take Gwent over.
Last edited by a moderator:
...so my opponent forfeited at the very end of round 3, and as sometimes happens with a forfeit, the 'gg' button wasn't there... for me! I did get a 'gg' from my opponent... Anyways, it really pisses me off for two reasons: 1. He probably thinks I just didn't 'gg' him out of choice, and 2. It actually was a good game and I wanted to give him credit! Urgh!
There... Rant over.
There... Rant over.
I almost always GG, except against those TRULY terrible people who taunt relentlessly ( those special people who think they're the only player with a Dandelion Avatar who plays Nilfgaard deck ). I don't mute players because I still like the friendly banter and even complimenting good moves, because you know...why you heff to be mad? iz just gaem.
kcramthun;n9490831 said:
This exactly. I almost always GG and I also often compliment people during the game. It's just a game afterall and I enjoy every match, so.. yeah.
Changed policy on this. Now if you play NR you don't get a gg. It was never a good game.
I jest of course.
the only time I don't gg is if the other player has spammed the dandelion chat. Mostly telling me I have made a mistake. Etc etc. When they realise I have out played them and they lose they rage quit.
I mean if you are going to talk smack and then lose you should have the decency to see the game through.
I jest of course.
the only time I don't gg is if the other player has spammed the dandelion chat. Mostly telling me I have made a mistake. Etc etc. When they realise I have out played them and they lose they rage quit.
I mean if you are going to talk smack and then lose you should have the decency to see the game through.
Last edited: