Not as bad as the Star Trek II: The Wrath of Spock monstrosity Abrams came up with! Compared to that the writing in this game is positively Shakespearean.I've never said that he is not quailfied. He could be. But his opinion it's not objective, it's just that, his opinion. What he did it was an evaluation of the game just by itself, without comparing with the previous one and that's precisely the point of the people who consider the TW3 a bad written game. TW2 was better by far. And as I said before, you could be a writer, you could love games and play them but that doens't make you a good writer. I'll put some examples: JJ Abrams or Stephenie Mayer. If someone who is a cinema director writes a review saying how awesome was the last Star Wars film, he could say whatever he want, the film is shit anyway.
My point is that, he could be whatever he wants, his opinions are not better than the one which has been written in this post