Why the person above you should be banned

[aonepathan]

^ Ban for banning too many birds in a single ban

 

[Draconifors]

^ Banned for condoning the banning of birds in any numbers.

 

[Skirlasvoud]

Banned for condoning the banning of any living being.

Y’all are horrible human beings!

 

[Draconifors]

^ Banned for not explicitly disapproving of the banning of non-living beings. What did rocks do to deserve to be OK to ban?
(Too easy but I couldn't resist.)

 

[Jesting-Jack]

Banned because SHINY CHORFUN GONE!

 

[Skirlasvoud]

^ Ban for not keeping a stiff upper lip.

 

[Riven-Twain]

No ban. Loose lips sink ships.

 

[4meg]

^Banned for not taking icebergs into account.

 

[Jesting-Jack]

Banned for your chilly disposition.

 

[Skirlasvoud]

^ Banned, because a chilly dis-position is what sank the ship in the first place.

 

[CyberBrett]

Banned for the lack of lifeboats .

 

[4meg]

Banned for bringing a boat into a knife fight.

 

[Riven-Twain]

^ Ban for going overboard.

 

[DannyCortz]

^ Ban for not helping him.

 

[Draconifors]

^ Banned for not helping him help him.

 

[venseyness]

^Banned for redundancy

 

[Hayashi.226]

Ban for opportunism.

 

[Jesting-Jack]

Confucius says this is an auspicious time for banning.

 

[CyberBrett]

To ban or not to ban was Shakespeare's first thought before a slight re write.

 

[Skirlasvoud]

If I ban CyberBrett, and nobody is around to see it, did CyberBrett ever exist?

^ Ban