Will Geralt able to Dual Wield daggers?

[archaven.84]

Will Geralt able to Dual Wield daggers?

I'm not sure if this has been asked elsewhere but i do know that Geralt will be able to use different weapons other than longswords. Does Geralt able to dual wield daggers? It may look cool but not sure if it's in the books.. I don't read the books though.

 

[luscsul]

I'm not sure if this has been asked elsewhere but i do know that Geralt will be able to use different weapons other than longswords. Does Geralt able to dual wield daggers? It may look cool but not sure if it's in the books.. I don't read the books though.

It's possible to use other weapons but we don't know to wich extent, I personally hope it will be nothing more than TW1.Please if you want dual wield or a shield, redirect to DA2 for all your needs...Geralt and the witchers in general are master swordsmen, why do everyone feel the need to give them daggers, polearms, plate armors and so on... we have a different game for once and people want it to be the same as everything around.NB: mind you I never had the occasion to read the books... stillNB2: sorry for sounding harsh but this things irk me a lot

 

[Vlk5]

dual wield i don't think so, he can i think throw dagger, and in the latest dev diary they say that aside from the swords Gerald can use "hammer, axe and halbert", probably has more but it was not mentioned

 

[secondchildren]

In the Faq, Szypek mentioned only throwing daggers and petards. But there will a wider range on weapons in the game, much more than in TW1. Btw, Geralt can't use any other ranged weapon, like a crossbow for example.

 

[archaven.84]

The bombs is more a real treat to me already. Don't need crossbows or bows. I just feel dual-wielding daggers would be cool. Doesn't mean it has to relate to DA2. No need for the insults.I just thought since they already make Geralt able to use other weapons like hammer, polearms and even mandolin.. lol. why not dual wield daggers huh

 

[luscsul]

The bombs is more a real treat to me already. Don't need crossbows or bows. I just feel dual-wielding daggers would be cool. Doesn't mean it has to relate to DA2. No need for the insults.

Sorry but I fail to see the insult and I already said sorry in the second note for the general tone of the post...If I happen to like an aspect of a game I don't go around asking it to be implemented in every other title I may play just "cuz it lookz COOL", that's what kills nowadays games. Just like the member that asked for full platemail... The game is based on a specific lore for which witchers are trained in a specific way, I really fail to see how putting dual wield daggers or whatever else would make for a better game instead of a "clone game".

 

[GuyNwah]

Dual wielding with a dagger in the off hand, more accurately called "main gauche" or "Florentine style", would be reasonable if Geralt were actually using one-handed weapons. But what he's using is a two-handed longsword -- the kind Liechtenauer taught young toughs how to use without shield or armor, the kind mercenary shock troops got double pay for slicing and dicing the enemy front lines with -- only the animations are one-handed.Dual wielding just doesn't have a place in his time (light one-handed swords were a later invention in real life) or in Vesemir's school, which taught techniques that, much as Liechtenauer, didn't rely on an off-hand weapon.

 

[archaven.84]

The bombs is more a real treat to me already. Don't need crossbows or bows. I just feel dual-wielding daggers would be cool. Doesn't mean it has to relate to DA2. No need for the insults.

Sorry but I fail to see the insult and I already said sorry in the second note for the general tone of the post...If I happen to like an aspect of a game I don't go around asking it to be implemented in every other title I may play just "cuz it lookz COOL", that's what kills nowadays games. Just like the member that asked for full platemail... The game is based on a specific lore for which witchers are trained in a specific way, I really fail to see how putting dual wield daggers or whatever else would make for a better game instead of a "clone game".

You are asking ME to redirect myself to DA2 if i want shield and daggers for all my need because YOU don't want something to be implemented in the game.. Who are you to turn down someone's opinion and suggestions? So just because someone suggested something you do not LIKE you can simply ask him to buck off? Then CAN I ask you buck off if i don't like your suggestion please? And you find that not insulting? That's really funny.I'm a reasonable man. I do AGREE that if the game is based on specific lore that witchers are trained to use only two-handed swords, i'm FINE. But again, i didnt read the books. DID the lore mentioned the witcher could use other weapons such as polearms, halberds and even OARS? If not why can the developers put them in? Should you ask the developers if they don't stick strictly to the books please don't touch the Witcher franchise?

 

[GuyNwah]

The Witcher combat has definite styles. These were set forth in the books and the first game. Viroledans (group) style was not carried forward into TW2 -- probably because it was unbalanced.Of course, if you have to use a found weapon, you use it as best you are able. TW1 allowed that, with the appropriate restriction that you cannot use it in witcher styles. But witchers train with d***ed big swords and can counter any attack with just the sword, not an anachronistic main gauche that takes up a hand that should be free to use for two-handed blows and parries.Dual wielding has its place, but that place is the Three Musketeers and Hong Kong cinema. It's out of place in the Witcher's world.

 

[archaven.84]

The Witcher combat has definite styles. These were set forth in the books and the first game. Viroledans (group) style was not carried forward into TW2 -- probably because it was unbalanced.Of course, if you have to use a found weapon, you use it as best you are able. TW1 allowed that, with the appropriate restriction that you cannot use it in witcher styles. But witchers train with d***ed big swords and can counter any attack with just the sword, not an anachronistic main gauche that takes up a hand that should be free to use for two-handed blows and parries.Dual wielding has its place, but that place is the Three Musketeers and Hong Kong cinema. It's out of place in the Witcher's world.

Can i also say that wielding hammers/halbers/oars/mandolin is also out of witcher's world? As i said i'm a reasonable person and i agree if it's not based on the lore of the witcher's world but why the latter i asked was not of concerns?

 

[Eri94_user70]

I think you misunderstood Guy N'wah, halberds and such, are still common used medieval weapons while dual wielding daggers are more suited for "rouge" characters and asian culture (in some degree atleast), though you are right that none of the mentioned weapons are weapons "suited" for a witcher.Now based on the character, Geralt is more a two-weapon wielding man (since that's how he was trained) and by that logic it would be unlogical he would dual wield any weapon, granted an oar or halberd are not a "witcher" weapon either but it is still a two-handed weapon so in some degree it would make more sense to use them over dual daggers. So I find it unlikely that dual wielding will be implemented although it would be a nice touch. There is still a possibility he will use a dagger in a finisher move and as he now can throw them they have more significant meaning than the previous game.

 

[ravengr]

I think you misunderstood Guy N'wah, halberds and such, are still common used medieval weapons while dual wielding daggers are more suited for "rouge" characters and asian culture (in some degree atleast), though you are right that none of the mentioned weapons are weapons "suited" for a witcher.Now based on the character, Geralt is more a two-weapon wielding man (since that's how he was trained) and by that logic it would be unlogical he would dual wield any weapon, granted an oar or halberd are not a "witcher" weapon either but it is still a two-handed weapon so in some degree it would make more sense to use them over dual daggers. So I find it unlikely that dual wielding will be implemented although it would be a nice touch. There is still a possibility he will use a dagger in a finisher move and as he now can throw them they have more significant meaning than the previous game.

Well actually he was talking about the sword and dagger fighting style where the off-hand weapon is mostly used for parrying iirc. Duual-wielding daggers is a very gamey concept not to mention attacking a well armored opponent with a dagger is rather suicidal. 1 handed swords wouldn't be that effective against armor either. If they stay true to the lore you won't see Geralt using any alternative weapons outside an emergency.

 

[GuyNwah]

Can i also say that wielding hammers/halbers/oars/mandolin is also out of witcher's world? As i said i'm a reasonable person and i agree if it's not based on the lore of the witcher's world but why the latter i asked was not of concerns?

He certainly would not use them outside of an emergency. But no different from anybody else, if he were caught disarmed and there were an oar handy, he would bash his enemy with the oar.However, Geralt spent years training to defend himself with a two-handed longsword, not anything else.Florentine style dual wielding might be something Geralt would encounter from a foreign opponent who trained in this style. He might even learn it.Japanese style dual wielding (Niten Ichi-ryu) with katana and wakizashi as taught by Musashi would not be absurd, but no weapons even vaguely similar to these exist in the Witcher's world.Dual wielding in the style of Hong Kong cinema has no place in any game that aims for any kind of realistic swordplay.

 

[archaven.84]

I think you misunderstood Guy N'wah, halberds and such, are still common used medieval weapons while dual wielding daggers are more suited for "rouge" characters and asian culture (in some degree atleast), though you are right that none of the mentioned weapons are weapons "suited" for a witcher.Now based on the character, Geralt is more a two-weapon wielding man (since that's how he was trained) and by that logic it would be unlogical he would dual wield any weapon, granted an oar or halberd are not a "witcher" weapon either but it is still a two-handed weapon so in some degree it would make more sense to use them over dual daggers. So I find it unlikely that dual wielding will be implemented although it would be a nice touch. There is still a possibility he will use a dagger in a finisher move and as he now can throw them they have more significant meaning than the previous game.

Thanks for being polite.. You know i was only suggesting that it may feel cool if Geralt can actually dual-wield. As i said couple of times i'm perfectly fine if it does not suits the witcher's world and lore. But again there are other weapons that were already implemented that was out of the witcher's lore too. People don't have to be so offensive asking you to go elsewhere because they don't agree to your suggestions right?To those shallow minded people who has not seen anything beyond Dragon Age2 should give Prince of Persia: Two Thrones a try and see how cool the prince using dagger with Speedkills.

 

[SystemShock7]

In The Witcher, the Scoia'tael wield dual swords, but more importantly, I remember a few occasions when Geralt fights both humans and beasts at the same time. In this scenario, it makes sense within the context of the game lore to have Geralt wield dual weapons, one silver, one steel.

 

[Garrison72]

I wonder if Geralt can throw more than one dagger in quick succession. And I agree, dual wielding does seem a bit out of place in TW2, but the fact is its already in some of the finishing moves I've seen.

 

[luscsul]

I wonder if Geralt can throw more than one dagger in quick succession. And I agree, dual wielding does seem a bit out of place in TW2, but the fact is its already in some of the finishing moves I've seen.

I think that finishing moves are a different thing, like Geralt unleashing combat rage on his foe with brutal methods so everything can be game @archaven: way to misunderstand... my point was, if you want something specific go for a game that has it instead of asking it in another one that for lore reason souldn't have it. Probably you don't even read my post and only see the DA2 part, cause I too haven't read the books but understand that some things clearly don't fit in this game.Jeez, referencing PoP "COOL" combat just demonstrates a lot of things as to what you expect from a game... you've gone around threads suggesting:1) dual wield2) firestorm3) handsome young emo GeraltYou say you're reasonable and accept the lore yet you suggest things out of the blue just for nothing more than the COOLNESS factor.Allright I'm definitely out, I'll ignore every future post of yours/end rant[moderator]Personal attack deleted. It's fine to disagree with one another. It's even fine to disagree passionately. But please make your comments about the IDEA and not the PERSON. [/moderator]

 

[archaven.84]

By the way you reply

I wonder if Geralt can throw more than one dagger in quick succession. And I agree, dual wielding does seem a bit out of place in TW2, but the fact is its already in some of the finishing moves I've seen.

I think that finishing moves are a different thing, like Geralt unleashing combat rage on his foe with brutal methods so everything can be game @archaven: way to misunderstand... my point was, if you want something specific go for a game that has it instead of asking it in another one that for lore reason souldn't have it. Probably you don't even read my post and only see the DA2 part, cause I too haven't read the books but understand that some things clearly don't fit in this game.Jeez, referencing PoP "COOL" combat just demonstrates a lot of things as to what you expect from a game... you've gone around threads suggesting:1) dual wield2) firestorm3) handsome young emo GeraltYou say you're reasonable and accept the lore yet you suggest things out of the blue just for nothing more than the COOLNESS factor.That pretty much says it all, how old are you, should you even be able to buy the game ? ...Allright I'm definitely out, I'll ignore every future post of yours and brand you a TROLL cause it's COOLER/end rant

The way how you represent yourself clearly shows how childish you are quickly branding someone as a TROLL who you disagree with. I'm in my 30s and most of my replies are polite without resorting to personal insults. You will be on my blacklist too. Thank you.

 

[tommy5761]

Come on guys we can disagree with one another and that`s all right as EVERYONE has a right to his/her own opinion . That`s what makes a forum enjoyable .But do so in an adult like manor and without name calling please .

 

[archaven.84]

Come on guys we can disagree with one another and that`s all right as EVERYONE has a right to his/her own opinion . That`s what makes a forum enjoyable .But do so in an adult like manor and without name calling please .

I totally agree with you there sir!. I'll just ignoring him for now.