WITCHER 3 fps benchmarks for your rig

[kobol12]

WITCHER 3 fps benchmarks for your rig

 

[NZSnowman]

Thanks, these number a very similar to the numbers I am get when I am running in 1080p or 1440 p on my GTX 980.

 

[kobol12]

:cheers:

 

[nleibert]

I have a Radeon 290 with i7 4770K @ 4.3GHz and I'm getting anywhere between 72-99FPS on all Ultra settings and hairworks off - surprised at how well the game runs.

 

[kobol12]

You can enable hairwork for you card using the trick that leaked!

 

[kobol12]

Any tricks you found for better performance?

 

[kobol12]

Patch 1.04 is out. Post your performance increase in here.

 

[kobol12]

Some quality upgrade and some sharpening is what i get. Hope another patch is on the way.

 

[Deezl_V]

I hope the ones that say they have higher frame rates of 60fps are playing on s TV/monitor that has a higher refresh rate (hz) than their frame rate. Because if you have a 60hz screen and are pushing (for example) 80 fps, you are really only getting 60 fps. Your monitor can only handle what it's max hz refresh rate is regardless if your fps is higher.

Fps & hz refresh rate coincide.

 

[kobol12]

I hope the ones that say they have higher frame rates of 60fps are playing on s TV/monitor that has a higher refresh rate (hz) than their frame rate. Because if you have a 60hz screen and are pushing (for example) 80 fps, you are really only getting 60 fps. Your monitor can only handle what it's max hz refresh rate is regardless if your fps is higher.

Fps & hz refresh rate coincide.

The eye perception is very individual and this is not fully true in some occasions.

 

[danwarb]

The eye perception is very individual and this is not fully true in some occasions.

But a monitor can only display 60 frames per second at 60hz.

Many will have 120Hz+ LCDs these day. Even the old Samsung TV I'm using as a monitor does 75Hz.

 

[kobol12]

It says so but believe I can tell the difference even on 60hz monitor.

 

[rebel7254]

It says so but believe I can tell the difference even on 60hz monitor.

No, it is physically and mathematically impossible to "see" a frame rate that is higher than the refresh rate of the display. If the refresh reate is 60 Hz, that literally means the monitor/TV refreshes the screen 60 times per second. So if the screen can only refresh 60 times in a second, then it is not possible for the monitor display a frame rate higher than that. FRAPS and other tools use software to calculate the frame rate by gathering data from the graphics card, not the display device.

 

[kobol12]

WITCHER 3 tested on GTX 980 Ti

AND GTX 980 Ti overclock capabilities also tested


[video=youtube;RsuyAtF-c_0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsuyAtF-c_0[/video]

 

[kobol12]

1.05 is out and performance go up again.

 

[PsG1988]

I have now with all Settings on ultra except Hairworks (Off) and Distance LOD (High)

@ 1080P / unlimited frames / vsync on / physx set to CPU / latest Nvidia driver
= 35-60 FPS ! With my old GPU (GTX770 2GB) a good thing ! System details below in the signature if anyone is interested.

 

[Smurfin]

980 Ti performance is so close to Titan X, but better wait for Nvidia Pascal