That's neither true 60 FPS nor better quality...
quest:
Find a logo?
Attachments
I know who Bieber is, but I'm not american and don't find it funny. And why there is the polish developer and Biber at all?Damien Monnier @ 11:40.
Only Damien.... LOLIt seems like everywhere he goes to present TW3 he leaves a stage burning in his wake with his off-the-wall sense of humor. I feel like someone should make a video montage of that man's stage jokes.
The game is beyond beautiful. But I noticed a detail, I hope it is because of the compression, but in january's gameplay Geralt's hair had pretty hair flocks moving when he ran, in gdc video he has not... I want them too badly XD
Agree about floodlights, I prefer the one in the 35min demo. They were visible but didn't really announce their presence.
But I think you're mistaken about the effect lingering on enemies, because it doesn't. The purplish cloak/glow/whatever that coats enemies only occurs when an enemy passes through the boundary of the trap. This is likely because the version of Yrden being used slows time within its radius, exactly as Heliotrope did in TW2. Why Yrden can now do this... I suspect has something to do with the skill tree being full of skills that can be activated etc. Anyways in both TW2 and 3, enemies are briefly coated in white and purple respectively when they passed into Heliotrope's boundary. Unless all versions of Yrden use this purple cloak/glow, I don't think it's a problem.
Notice I said "tall grass", but that's just one example of a terrain. Maybe the lights don't need to be that high but there needs to be more than a terrain level speckle. In the 35 min video it was basically on water level so it was easier to spot. And the FX on the enemy is to show weather or not the enemy is affected by the spell. Witcher 2 Yrden was an orange lightning so it's basically just different colour. It's either that or some sort of a bubble that slows time within it, but that would be even more over the top.
Again this is probably first and foremost a gameplay design choice. A player needs to be aware of the spell and its effect. We are not witchers, we don't have attuned senses. We need visual cues. Some more than others.
Last edited:
I'm impressed by this 2 minute presentation and those issues people are talking about above either aren't going to exist by 19th of May or will be modded very shortly afterwards, IMO. Not even worried, maaan. So I ain't complaining in the slighest
but as it's an inherent part of my culture to laugh at stuff obnoxiously, I had a tubby giggle at this:
View attachment 10941
but as it's an inherent part of my culture to laugh at stuff obnoxiously, I had a tubby giggle at this:
View attachment 10941
Attachments
They've shown some examples, very few, but haven't discussed mechanics. For instance, during the development of Wasteland 2 inXile explained the keyword-based dialogue system and how your choices are based on collected evidence and experience. The current pitch for Underworld Ascendant includes descriptions and footage of how the world reacts dynamically to possible actions, such as casting a lighting bolt on a piece of wood. CDPR has only casually mentioned these topics, but I think they are more relevant than the, yes, impressive visuals and exciting combat. Only because this supposed to be (at least partly) an RPG.
People complaining about graphics and downgrades: rewatch the video and notice how they say it's not on the highest settings, and that they want to leave that as a surprise.
You're talking about the hairworks feature. Likely it was turned off for the GDC demo, but you'll have the option to turn it on for certain when the retail version ships.
I think it's PC exclusive as well, but don't quote me..
January's demo didn't have hairworks turned on either.
Hair looked pretty much the same as it did back in January to be honest.
No. You are wrong. Its not same. In January hair was a bit short than GDC. And moved differently and reacted differently to wind. Look cearfully when Geralt get down from horse with Vesemir after Griffin scene. I hope you will notice difference. And look when Geralt talk to guardian and enter to camp in January footage. But for best result watch side by side. Difference you will notice when Geralt walking.
Both of them are beautiful. It's subjectiv opinion. For me January one was best. But again. Both of them just amazing.
And i hope it is different hair stile. We can see both of them in game. CDProject. Dont make such beautifle game. I cant work. Today i hundred time watched GDC
With that additude, you´re gonna be dissapointed, no matter how good the witcher 3 is.
NO no no. You said hair looked pretty much the same. I said no. Its not. In January footage hair moved and reacted to wind differently. And reason for this i thing different hair stile.
I wasn't even talking about hairstyle.
I just watched the B-roll footage again, and while hairworks wasn't turned on for most things, it was certainly turned on for Geralt and I believe maybe even Vesemir. This is likely a byproduct of the "high" setting where hairworks is only being applied to major characters.
On ultra, I'd expect hairworks to be applied to minor NPCs as well as monsters and animals..