- Status
the last 200pages + 3 locked tthreads have been about this mate
we can just wait till modders do it(when redkit releases) or cdpr does it themselves
the least you can do now it use reshade/sweetfx or cutscene lighting by kng
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm still predicting we won't get a response from CDPR until this thread hits 1000 pages.
Modders will be our savior , hopefully.
maybe we can merge all threads? will give it a nice 500 page boost
actually it wouldnot be economical for CDPR to do it.
About modders, it would depend on REDkits malleability
---------- Updated at 09:41 AM ----------
Anyone want trisses old face back?
Yes I want.maybe we can merge all threads? will give it a nice 500 page boost
actually it wouldnot be economical for CDPR to do it.
About modders, it would depend on REDkits malleability
---------- Updated at 09:41 AM ----------
Anyone want trisses old face back?
maybe we can merge all threads? will give it a nice 500 page boost
actually it wouldnot be economical for CDPR to do it.
About modders, it would depend on REDkits malleability
---------- Updated at 09:41 AM ----------
Anyone want trisses old face back?
I'd like Options , honestly , I'd like to have the OPTION of having her face back , and Yennefer's Sword of Destiny Face.
I would also LIKE to have the OPTION of having Hairworks Off for Geralt and On Monsters.(I Know there is a mod that does that, Official Support would be nice)
If you mean the SOD one, not really, I prefer this one, although it has lower polys. But I definitely don't like the current bitch face of yen.
witcher 2 face or if its not possible , sod face would be good too
About yen ,i dont give a flying frack , i personally dont like her at all
They don't even need to release official red kit modding tools I think.
Well, what exactly is keeping people right now from creating texture mods and FX and particle mods and all that stuff?
Are some of the files still encrypted? Er..what is the technical term for all this. Hardlocked or something
Well, what exactly is keeping people right now from creating texture mods and FX and particle mods and all that stuff?
Are some of the files still encrypted? Er..what is the technical term for all this. Hardlocked or something
i think they are packed in some format (.env i guess) which needs specific tools (like redkit) to unpack and repack.
i heard guys are working to create a tool to do it.Better than waiting fir redkit
For those who want an adjustable camera in the game: http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/49107-Adjustable-Camera-Mod?p=1781712#post1781712
Yeah hopefully people make some tools for unpacking. Then we can start making real graphical tweaks, not just reshade and filters and questionable "lighting" mods.
So. Are you going to get back to discussing graphics sometime soon?
so about graphics, i would be very surprised if CDPR dosnt release an EE of W3 with SOD level of graphics, what they did back then will look " normal " in 6 months / 1 year, probably even some trailers will already crush that at this year E3 ( like tonight literally )
and to clear up things about modding, at this point we cant to do anything, we dont have a reliable way to re inject modded files without breaking the game, and even then most file are crypted ( not literally ) for being used with CDPR tools, ther's no way to edit them right now
so yeah modding is pretty much dead without Redkit, unless someone figure out compression algorythms and decryption of *.env and *.w2l files
and to clear up things about modding, at this point we cant to do anything, we dont have a reliable way to re inject modded files without breaking the game, and even then most file are crypted ( not literally ) for being used with CDPR tools, ther's no way to edit them right now
so yeah modding is pretty much dead without Redkit, unless someone figure out compression algorythms and decryption of *.env and *.w2l files
Yes you can. Many are using it already. But that does not change the worst problems.
I'm new to this thread, and wanted to give my to cents on that matter.
This is how I see things from a technical standpoint:
Does W3 look good? - Yes.
Does W3 look beautiful? - in some regions at certain times of day, yes. (I'm having Novigrad at dawn in mind)
Does it look 2015 beautiful overall? Not for a PC version. But to be honest, neither do any other PC non-exclusives. (except maybe GTAV)
Could W3 graphics be as good as the infamous gameplay trailer AND running at 60fps on PC (on mid-high end rigs)? - Given extra development time and more resources for a separate or vastly improved PC build, yes. I think CDPR is talented enough to have been able to achieve this. But then again I am no developer, I have no idea of the technicalities. I am just extrapolating what I see now / saw years ago in PC games in general.
Am I disappointed by the graphical quality overall? - Since I only watched the early presentations and ignored everything that came after 2013 on purpose, I must say yes, a little bit. But it has less to do with W3, and more with the path the game industry is going down.
Does the quality of the graphics play a major role of the quality of the game overall? Not for me, it just feels like a missed opportunity to make a good game even better.
Like I said, I make these assumptions based on what I, as a gamer experienced earlier in my gaming career, and the progression of what is possible in terms of graphical quality/fidelity and hardware.
On a closing note, I can't but mention how important it is to have a "healthy" modding environment, and ongoing support.
This is how I see things from a technical standpoint:
Does W3 look good? - Yes.
Does W3 look beautiful? - in some regions at certain times of day, yes. (I'm having Novigrad at dawn in mind)
Does it look 2015 beautiful overall? Not for a PC version. But to be honest, neither do any other PC non-exclusives. (except maybe GTAV)
Could W3 graphics be as good as the infamous gameplay trailer AND running at 60fps on PC (on mid-high end rigs)? - Given extra development time and more resources for a separate or vastly improved PC build, yes. I think CDPR is talented enough to have been able to achieve this. But then again I am no developer, I have no idea of the technicalities. I am just extrapolating what I see now / saw years ago in PC games in general.
Am I disappointed by the graphical quality overall? - Since I only watched the early presentations and ignored everything that came after 2013 on purpose, I must say yes, a little bit. But it has less to do with W3, and more with the path the game industry is going down.
Does the quality of the graphics play a major role of the quality of the game overall? Not for me, it just feels like a missed opportunity to make a good game even better.
Like I said, I make these assumptions based on what I, as a gamer experienced earlier in my gaming career, and the progression of what is possible in terms of graphical quality/fidelity and hardware.
On a closing note, I can't but mention how important it is to have a "healthy" modding environment, and ongoing support.
I'm sorry but what is with the bloom in this game. There is no reason for Geralt's metal swords and armor parts to be blurry and gleaming like its a hot summer day in the middle of a rainstorm. Insult to injury by making the rainstorms unrealistically dark. Not a good contrast.
- Status