They don't. A weird choice by CDPR.i'm not sure what colors have to do with the consoles performance ? 0.-
Last edited:
They don't. A weird choice by CDPR.i'm not sure what colors have to do with the consoles performance ? 0.-
You just need some sort of cheat to avoid fall damage and then you can jump over the walls. I believe you go back to Kaer Morhen later in the game though, so I'm not sure if that area is actually anything special. I guess the draw distance might be better? Not sure.Wow! How did you manage to get there? It's in the prologue, right? The tutorial part? If you can go back there then please try avoiding spoilers.
I personally don't remember how big the draw distance was in the prologue. It's such a small part of the game in the beginning. And if it is that big then my God, what a huge discrepancy.
The current lighting is only OK at daytime, when it's raining, at night and indoors it looks horrible. How one can claim that the current lighting is better than in SOD trailer is beyond me.
To all people saying that PCs cannot run the SOD trailer version of the game, this is so far from the truth.
I am running Skyrim with 450 mods, a mod pack (with 200+texture mods, ENB...) . My pc is more than 5 years old, only updated the GFX card a year ago to Nvidia 780...
The game looks stunning first of all, and im running between 30-60 FPS outdoors and 60 FPS stable indoors.
If the Witcher 3 cannot be played with a graphical upgrade on today's hardware, then simply the game is not properly optimized.
To all people saying that PCs cannot run the SOD trailer version of the game, this is so far from the truth.
I am running Skyrim with 450 mods, a mod pack (with 200+texture mods, ENB...) . My pc is more than 5 years old, only updated the GFX card a year ago to Nvidia 780...
The game looks stunning first of all, and im running between 30-60 FPS outdoors and 60 FPS stable indoors.
If the Witcher 3 cannot be played with a graphical upgrade on today's hardware, then simply the game is not properly optimized.
actually you're both correct ^^skyrim and the witcher 3 dont use the same engine, therefore cant compare them to one another. Also skyrim has less npcs, smaller cities and lots of loading screens
And therefore we cannot compare? So we can only compare games with the same engine? As in: We can only compare the Witcher with the Witcher. *Facepalm*skyrim and the witcher 3 dont use the same engine, therefore cant compare them to one another. Also skyrim has less npcs, smaller cities and lots of loading screens
Starting at 5:49 he says the exact thing I find as the most reasonable cause of the PC downgrade. Now lets baptize reasoning as a conspiracy theoryGood video.
Apparently according to a CDPR dev HIMSELF, PC's were PERFECTLY capable of running the old version of the Witcher 3. So people should stop the nonsense that 99% wouldn't be able to run it.
I agree, he is pretty straightforward about it. CDPR just sold themselves out for Microsoft and Sony to make the game on par with the consoles.Starting at 5:49 he says the exact thing I find as the most reasonable cause of the PC downgrade. Now lets baptize reasoning as a conspiracy theory![]()
What? No...the lightning is what is wrong with the game. It's what's wrong with every single area. Badowski, the lead designer said it himself, 'maybe we should have tried a different tenderer' . That imo is the biggest visual issue with TW3, and what separates it from the past games.gone to skellige yesterday, ther's something special about lighting there, its really really better than any other zone, even when the sun isnt directly hitting the area the lighting look more realistic, in the other zones it look just dull, i think it might be the least downgraded area
![]()
So are you telling me that Skyrim's Engine, which is 4 years older, is better than the TW3 engine?skyrim and the witcher 3 dont use the same engine, therefore cant compare them to one another. Also skyrim has less npcs, smaller cities and lots of loading screens
If this is true, its the most pathetic thing ever done in Gaming History.Starting at 5:49 he says the exact thing I find as the most reasonable cause of the PC downgrade. Now lets baptize reasoning as a conspiracy theory![]()
less loading screens, more stuff to loaded in the background, which affects performance. Also the city in the witcher 3 are still bigger even in comparision to the modded onesSo are you telling me that Skyrim's Engine, which is 4 years older, is better than the TW3 engine?
My mods include revamped and extended cities, New Areas, 100s of new NPCs and unique monsters... I don't really care about loading screens as long as i can indulge in eye candy.
you are forgetting that besthesda is a much larger company than cdrp. They have more money and manpowertrue m8, but you forget Skyrim is 4 years old, and the PC hardware and software made great leaps in this period.
You realize this is the Grafics Thread yes?Lol I don't know what are people complaining about. The Witcher was and still one of my favorite games of all the time and it doesn't look all that glorious this days and so what. Great game is great no matter graphics! Stop crying and start playing! Maybe everyone who complains need to go and replay witcher games and then come back and talk about witcher 3.
Ouch, warn us next time Dude, my poor Eyes. Did you make that Screenshot?I don't know if it was already posted or nor, but I just take some screenshoot..
This is from gameplay:
![]()
And this is from SOD trailer:
![]()
Hmm.. :ermm: