So explain that line
"Deep down there" = deep down inside her, assuming she still loves Geralt, she wants an opportunity to fall in his arms. Just like she does when she lures him to the fountain, like I said that doesn't seem a spontaneous "drunk" behaviour. It's not a thought that is really present on her mind, is a deeper and more irracional one. When you love someone but you know you can't have the person you will try to get over it, and act so, to not get hurt. But at the same time you have an irrational and low profile wish that life will make something happen to give you the opportunity to have this person. Like a dream, for an example. When you like someone but your chances are low, even so you dream with her in a world that things worked to make you stay together.
That's more or less what I meat, hope you understand now.
She had few, excluding party and she didn't do a thing
Mention one good situation as good as the ball. That was the perfect one, plus it was the first situation she got driven by the whole atmosphere.
we don't have to argue, don't we? It does not benefit anyone.
That's up to you, don't know where that question came from to be honest. I just sent you a lot of my favourite mods, that was in a very friendly way.
I just said that you keep doing wrong assumptions of what I said, like "Not all women he treats like that." and I also never said she's scheming and plained everything to have Geralt back...
That wasn't even in friendly manner. There is a difference between sarcasm and flirt.
He was being serious about handcuffing Triss in the middle of the square? Also don't see much difference between her waist comment. He would perfectly say that to Phil or Shani. I could mention a lot of other examples with Yen and other women he has intimacy that he jokes with on a naughty way. Most of them has the same conotation and it's part of his sense of humor, imo. He has that kind of sarcasm all the time.
Philippa: "Triss plays the big sister to Ciri, but eagerly awaits a chance to hop in bed with you. You and Yennefer play the parents..."
Geralt: "Yeah, so if you're angling to make it a fivesome, there's clearly no room."
Now, I gave you the context. It's a very sugestional one, to not say sexual. You can easily intepret as a flirting or a compliment there, just like the handcuffs, waist and etc.
Maybe this can exemplifies a little:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhbpWnvC6QM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kOWeQubasA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YciuKvCP4v0
If you want to be that precise the question of topic was who Geralt should choose.
If we are talking about his romantic arch it is on topic... That comment I quoted just takes the discussion to nowhere, if we are talking about the romances it is basically Geralt to Yen and Triss. But if you take it to the bigger picture (which is off topic) both has a lot more as characters, of course. That sounded like I think Geralt is everything interesting in their characters. And I don't believe you're the one who says what we should or not talk about.
But it's basically speculation and we can only guess what would be the topic of their conversations.
That is the main problem, they are just assumptions. It is a fact that they had opportunity and they spent some time together, but it is not that they talked about a subject other than Ciri's situation. I believe that Yen, Triss, Ciri or a secondary character would have mentioned such a conversation. It's not even implied and their interactions do not show that they had a catfight or that they settle their differences and are friends again. It could have happened, but, who knows...
I don't think we refer to the same Dijkstra conversation
Oh, sure. But it is also another context. He was more serious there, even surprised seeing Triss again and working to Djkstra. If you say that Triss is in the past she will get hurt and question him, that felt a little too harsh to me and was a little out of character. Just like when he dumps Yen. But that wasn't an opportunity like tha ball, they were working and with a lot of people around. It's a very different situation, imo.
Last edited: