We are so blessed to notice such things.
How do we do that - I have no idea. I mean - it's just written on paper.
We are so blessed to notice such things.
How do we do that - I have no idea. I mean - it's just written on paper.
Here is another picutre of the ingame model sculpt by Pawel Mielniczuk:
Seems she meant they had to put extra effort in spelling out to the player why, despite her abrasive personality, Geralt/Yen fit, such as his answer to Cerys when she asks him "What is it that draws you to her?"
I thought they did a passable job with Yen. Too bad they had less of an idea how to write Blinky.
In one word or more? ;D
---------- Zaktualizowano 17:34 ----------
Yeah..and there you have it...the reason for the whole amnesia plotline
The amnesia is there to make it an RPG not specifically to do with romance. Without it Geralt wouldn't have been able to make most of the choices possible in the first 2 games. Actually don't think amnesia would have made use of Yen impossible, though no doubt many would have been unhappy at possibility of amnesiac Geralt rejecting her.
I honestly don't like that reply from the interview (who is just, who cannot love etc...) because at that point if it's what she/they thought then that's only what she/they grasped from the books, no wonder why Yennefer and other game characters seemed to be people from 20 years prior lol
Also why putting these characters in the game at this point. "It didn't fit to us" is the worst though, oh well I will just only wait for Blood and Wine then, after that, I wouldn't care for other interviews. Unless it's Cyberpunk related.
Unless:
Which leads to
Also why putting these characters in the game at this point. "It didn't fit to us" is the worst though, oh well I will just only wait for Blood and Wine then, after that, I wouldn't care for other interviews. Unless it's Cyberpunk related.
Unless:
Which leads to
Pretty much, but to be honest I generally liked Ciri.
:angry2: "You know, we should end this discussion before I say something i'll regret"
So, it is official then ?
Perhaps Yennefer could have been in the first game, not as an actual NPC, but the world being aware of her existence. And Geralt too, but because of the amnesia not remembering his feelings towards her. Thus, the "returning memories" sub-plot already beginning in TW1, but being less significant than in the sequel, not least since no one knows where Yennefer is or if she is even alive. Of course, when Witcher 1 was made, the story of the sequels was probably not planned yet, but in hindsight it could have been handled in a more consistent manner while keeping the overall story arc and major choices the same.
Then again, the choice of only "resurrecting" Geralt was also there. Or going ahead with the original plan of making Berengar the protagonist. And, according to the Witcher wiki, even Geralt being made female was a possibility, or at least demanded by a potential publisher.
Last edited:
I doubt it's the only reason for using amnesia plot device, but I don't mind it, imo it was the only way to offer enough freedom to the players and stay within the boundaries set by the lore. I love TW1 and 2 as they are and these games would have been completely different without the amnesia, I don't believe having even more book-friendly Geralt or inclusion of Yennefer from the start of the series would be worth the cost of altering their storylines. For me - I'm happy as long as I have the chance to make Geralt (finally!) ditch Triss and return to Yen, and I totally got the opportunity to do this in TW3.
As for Karolina, she doesn't have to love Yennefer, that's what Geralt is for
Which reminds me of one of my favorite lines in the game:I see most of the people are at least satisfied with her writing, so no harm done...
Attachments
-
1.jpg
Exactly, yennefer doesn't give a shit (that's what I love about her), It's like: Oh you don't like me? Wel that's your problem, your dead to me anyways XD
So, it is official then ?
Perhaps Yennefer could have been in the first game, not as an actual NPC, but the world being aware of her existence. And Geralt too, but because of the amnesia not remembering his feelings towards her. Thus, the "returning memories" sub-plot already beginning in TW1, but being less significant than in the sequel, not least since no one knows where Yennefer is or if she is even alive. Of course, when Witcher 1 was made, the story of the sequels was probably not planned yet, but in hindsight it could have been handled in a more consistent manner while keeping the overall story arc and major choices the same.
.
The easiest thing for more awareness of her existence but not her presence would be for the wild hunt to have implanted some false memories of Yennefer and Ciri's deaths alongside the amnesia at TW1 stage, allowing the TW1 to progress much as is.
Oh man I can only imagen that saying in Lambert's sarcastic voice XD
Aw, come on. In this thread you made fun of Blinky and Geralt, what's wrong with making fun of Triss? :wazzzup:
Hm, to be honest, i dont see "hate" here :wisegirl:
But true, lets go back to Yen
(btw, only me, is or is this forum today really laagy ) ?
Last edited:
