You're a machine!!! hell yea!!Well duh guys...
*interesting thing is, all posted versions so far except the Czech I can actually read
*Hehehehehe![]()
![]()
![]()
You're a machine!!! hell yea!!Well duh guys...
*interesting thing is, all posted versions so far except the Czech I can actually read
*Hehehehehe![]()
![]()
![]()
If you would watch the video interview there - Konrad is saying thisA little off topic - just watched an interview with Yennefer fan Konrad:
http://www.gamereactor.eu/news/329274/Witcher+3+expansions+"almost+size+of+Witcher+2"/
Besides DLC, Tomaszkiewicz also talks the improvements being currently implemented into the game, storytelling techniques, game feel and even some Gwent
it's not trueHowever, Triss has nothing to do in the books, comparing with Yen.
The key... SOME PEOPLE...If you would watch the video interview there - Konrad is saying this
"There are some small dissapointments in the storyline - some people wants to get more Triss than Yennefer and we are thinking how to make it work"
More Triss than Yen? Now I'm really worried![]()
Ehm..ok.. I propose this:some people wants to get more Triss than Yennefer
Beeeeeecause, even if inspired by books, it's still an RPG based on choices!I can't accept the reason of people disregarding the lore so that it suits their way of thinking.
If we take examples from other great RPG that have romances
1. Mass Effect
2. Dragon Age
IIRC, both of these games do not have books before them to give the inspiration. So the game itself builds the lore and the romance option.
As for the Witcher, the books are the source of inspiration and the lore for the world are already there. To disregard it is to just say I don't care about history.
It is like, wanting Princess Leia to be married to Luke Skywalker after Return of the Jedi. Just because "I like them to be together".
I can understand fan fiction where you just take the settings and character, and write your own story about it. But the game is still part of the lore (correct me if I am wrong here).
So, to disregard all that have happen in the book just to suit your way how the character should have developed?
Thx for the infos.A little off topic - just watched an interview with Yennefer fan Konrad:
http://www.gamereactor.eu/news/32927...+Witcher+2"/
Besides DLC, Tomaszkiewicz also talks the improvements being currently implemented into the game, storytelling techniques, game feel and even some Gwent
Just delete Yennefer and they are happy...Ehm..ok.. I propose this:
1.Replace Yen with Triss in the opening cinematic
2. Replace Yen with Triss in the dream sequence
3.Make it look like Geralt's trying to find Triss instead of Yen
Tadaaa...genius. Easy peasy
And what about the people who chose Shani instead Triss in TW1? Just asking...Beeeeeecause, even if inspired by books, it's still an RPG based on choices!![]()
And as long as there is choices people will do what bests suits them! Easy peasy!
I do agree, up to a point. But as the game have books as the lore, you need to really be faithful to it.Beeeeeecause, even if inspired by books, it's still an RPG based on choices!![]()
And as long as there is choices people will do what bests suits them! Easy peasy!
I see your point. In W3 you can romance Triss or Yennefer. It's choice you make but still people contimue to complain. Tell me why?Beeeeeecause, even if inspired by books, it's still an RPG based on choices!
And as long as there is choices people will do what bests suits them! Easy peasy!
The game is so much better if you have the knowledge from the books. The perspective switches a lot on lots of topics. You dont trust Avalach, because you know what he wanted from Ciri. You anderstand Geralt choice of romance. You have Strong attachment to Ciri, you cheer for her every single time. Knowledge of the books makes playing witcher series overall a greater experience.All good books are like that....
You know... that is the only thing that really annoys me at times on these forums
People not caring about the books.![]()
"Some people want more Triss than Yennefer and we are thinking what we can do to make it work." Well, if the game director said this in an interview, thay're really going to do something at this point. I just hope that there won't be any bad consequences for Yen...A little off topic - just watched an interview with Yennefer fan Konrad:
http://www.gamereactor.eu/news/329274/Witcher+3+expansions+"almost+size+of+Witcher+2"/
Besides DLC, Tomaszkiewicz also talks the improvements being currently implemented into the game, storytelling techniques, game feel and even some Gwent
Konrad is our (Guys here is the whole panel with Konrad - he is talking about books there and how important the lore is for them and how they thinking that the game is continuation of the books etc. - very interesting....
http://www.gamereactor.eu/grtv/?id=228924&sid=5f3ea9bf0f865a7c35784016b297d637
So the game is official lore. So the other team needs to accept that Yen is Ciri's mother and Geralt is Ciri's father.Guys here is the whole panel with Konrad - he is talking about books there and how important the lore is for them and how they thinking that the game is continuation of the books etc. - very interesting....
http://www.gamereactor.eu/grtv/?id=228924&sid=5f3ea9bf0f865a7c35784016b297d637
And where is Anais? Girl is important political figure...Or Adda?And what about the people who chose Shani instead Triss in TW1? Just asking...
I meant... what happened with those players who chose Shani instead Triss in TW1 and later they saw how in TW2 Triss is the only option and has lot of content? Because it's the same thing they're complaining about this game.Shami is coming back in the expansions.