Of course but irony is irony
Yeah, but it shows that he "gets it" on some level.
Of course but irony is irony
So only TY are allowed to make jokes on the slave stuff?Too much very cheap Irony. Sorry.
Not willing to discuss Triss here, I'll answer all your Triss deceptive related issues on the vs thread or her threadThe fact you can easily forgive and explain everything really bad Triss did and judge Yennefer for...the bed and the dead (Skjall) is so hilarious.
I don't think we will agree here. It seems we have different opinions about what is a reasonable reaction from Yennefer and how Geralt should act.But see, you were still in a relationship with her until you broke it off in the Last Wish quest, and she's upset with you for things you did while you were in a relationship with her. Sleeping with your significant others best friend and then running off with her is usually something that doesn't go over well, in any world, fantasy or real. People tend to react very badly to that kind of behavior. Sometimes even physically, and permanently, in ways I don't want to mention.
It would be more positive than you think, just without Geralt of course, who had thought thatBetter not to do it or post in Triss's topic, you write a suggestion for Triss stay alone in Kovir and ....
I don't think we will agree here. It seems we have different opinions about what is a reasonable reaction from Yennefer and how Geralt should act.
Though I'm not asking about a canon change. I said from the start that I want a option. If you think teleporting Geralt and threatening him is fine then you would still have the choice to just accept it.
Just out of curiosity. Do you think Geralt aarding Yennefer into a lake and threatening her with death would have been appropriate when he learned about her and Istredd?
[
It would be more positive than you think, just without Geralt of course, who had thought that
My intention, jokes aside, was to portray the fact that, again, Yen was in a very bad place emotionally at that moment, for the reasons I listed there. And so while the teleportation was a little too much imo, as she warned him earlier it was definetely not the best time to be fighting her. If Geralt wanted to argue, he could have waited till things were a little more calmed down and there was less pressure to all involved
Not willing to discuss Triss here, I'll answer all your Triss deceptive related issues on the vs thread or her thread
No, because that would be completely out of character for him. That's something I care about, whether it's in an RPG, or a book.
You've got to remember we are dealing with a predefined character that we can roleplay. There are going to be limitations because of that. It's not like Dragon Age where you create your own protagonist and define him or her however you wish. That's just a different kind of RPG.
Just another case of mages abusing their power that needs to be added to that very long list. What annoyed me about it is that I can't call her out on it, just have to accept being rag-dolled about the place every time she is feeling moody, at least I get to the other mages out on their shit.There are just tooooo many mentions of TELEPORT today like it's really something serious and it looks very funny.
Seems people need to clutch for something when they have no more significant reasons to build an argument.
Just out of curiosity. Do you think Geralt aarding Yennefer into a lake and threatening her with death would have been appropriate when he learned about her and Istredd?
Just another case of mages abusing their power that needs top be added to that very long list. What annoyed me about it is that I can't call her out on it, just have to accept being rag-dolled about the place every time she is feeling moody, at least I get to the other mages out on their shit.
fftopic:The fact we can't have the contracts on sorceresses turns this game into no-freedom-of-choice dust.
The best way to be rich and independent - work on Radovid and sell him all the mages.
Why spell in books is so important in games but Geralt's memories have any value in it?
Geralt is almost incapable to start open conflict / emotional dialogue with women, in general: Essi,letterfarewell to Fringilla, letter to Yen in Vengerberg, SoS spoilers:letter to Mozaik. He didn't even rise his voice to Lytta.
Audible dialogue in 'Shard of Ice' is almost an exception of the rule. In games Geralt can't be silent in some situations in which he wouldn't say a word in books, that's the difference between a methods of narrative in these forms of art.
See the pattern which was translated to the game? Physical threats, really?
In the books yes, but not in the games. He can start a open conflict with Shani/Triss in Witcher 1. For instance we get the option to talk to Shani about our decision to give Alvin to Triss, which leads to a temper tandrum.
He can tell Triss in Witcher 2 that he doesn't love/believe/trust her.
He can even call Keira a "vile, two-faced, four-tongued viper" and tell her that he regretted "fucking with her".
Games Geralt can be snappy.
For instance we get the option to talk to Shani about our decision to give Alvin to Triss, which leads to a temper tandrum.
He can tell Triss in Witcher 2 that he doesn't love/believe/trust her
He can even call Keira a "vile, two-faced, four-tongued viper" and tell her that he regretted "fucking with her".
Games Geralt can be snappy.
So, all this means that the existence of these dialogue options are basically the artistic freedom of CDPR's writers to write the play.
Or you're saying CDPR have not understood of Geralt's essence and have failed to transmit it properlyin the games?
Guys, just because you strike something out, doesn't mean we can't read it or see the see the meaning behind it...
Triss is an envious hag really nice.
Yennefer is an unforgiving bitch really empathic.
That's still mean in any way. If you want to say it, say it. If you think you shouldn't post it, because you will get trouble with mods, then don't write it in anyway, striked out or not...
Nobody is that stupid to not understand what you are trying by that, uncessary to put in insults and "cover it" with cheap tricks.