View attachment 11386654
Aloy is back .
How is your 4080 eating only 165watts?
View attachment 11386654
Aloy is back .
On the one hand, Forbidden West is well optimized, on the other hand, not all features (e.g. tensor cores) are utilized to the same extent as in Cyberpunk, for example.How is your 4080 eating only 165watts?
On the one hand, Forbidden West is well optimized, on the other hand, not all features (e.g. tensor cores) are utilized to the same extent as in Cyberpunk, for example.
In addition, the card is undervolted (0.935V at 2,700 MHz). As a result, it consumes no more than approx. 200 Watts in Cyberpunk, on average less (WQHD, DLSS Quality, FG, modded, ReShade 6.1):
View attachment 11386771
Jep, without UV it´s the same here, up to 320 Watt max. You will losing not much FPS by UV, but get lower Temps, slower fans, smoother Framerates... so UV is the standard setting for my 4080. As with the previous GPU (3070).
Thanks, i do. Really fun. Technically clean, smooth gameplay, good balance between story and exploration and a very likeable protagonist.Anyways, enjoy FW!
Ok, more I play, more I love the game...Mechanically, the game is a solid 8-9/10 in my opinion. I'm not far enough into the story to really comment on it. Been getting sidetracked by a million things and just general exploration but it's been intriguing and piqued my interest. Makes me want to see where it's going. Which is more than I can say for most games so that's worth something.
It's quite difficult yet because it's subjective and I didn't really push far the main quest(s), I'm so distracted to explore the open world which is fantasticThat sounds interesting. Because I value story and interesting characters, where would you place the narrative and characters in comparison to, for example, Cyberpunk, Horizon Forbidden West, Baldur's Gate 3, Fallout 3/4, Skyrim?
Because you show a certain expertise here, I would also like to know exactly that from you .t's quite difficult yet because it's subjective
Difficult to have a real advice yet. It would be like asking how good Cyberpunk story is while I only completed "The Pickup", "The Information" and spent most of my time exploring Watson and doing GIGs. So far so good, but I think I barely scratched the "story" itself, so story still can turn to be great, good, average, bad or really badBecause you show a certain expertise here, I would also like to know exactly that from you .
I wondered if it's worth to buy it again... Already have "everything" (Scortched Earch, Aberration, Extinction, Genesis 1 - 2 and all "modded" free maps). No sure I want to buy the game again and only to have access to The Island (great map, but still...).Bought Ark: Ascended, so I'm sort of playing Ark again. Game is the same, but with some tweaks. It has been a while since the last time I played it, and it seems to be fun again.
On a fairly mid-range system, I've got the game running at 50-80 FPS pretty much across the board with a little stutter here and there in the largest cities. Max shadows are about 90% of the major slowdown, so lowering them to High smooths things out immensely.
I wondered if it's worth to buy it again... Already have "everything" (Scortched Earch, Aberration, Extinction, Genesis 1 - 2 and all "modded" free maps). No sure I want to buy the game again and only to have access to The Island (great map, but still...).
So worth it? Look really better?
That sounds interesting. Because I value story and interesting characters, where would you place the narrative and characters in comparison to, for example, Cyberpunk, Horizon Forbidden West, Baldur's Gate 3, Fallout 3/4, Skyrim?
Knowing the original still put a Series X on its knees... I doubt it could run well, but who know.I can't speak for console but on PC it's a graphically decent upgrade. With that said, a friend of mine bought it and tried to convince me to join him and I am damn happy I did not. It did not feel worth it at all.
Well, ARK and bugs, it's like a love story... I have no doubt there are bugs and I'm sure a good amount, so I wouldn't mindWeirdly enough, a lot of the bugs that were present at the original's release and subsequently squashed came back
My biggest concern is if it's only on The Island, I play the game since early access, so I know almost each bush on the map. So buying the game, again to "simply" a slight graphic improvement, it's not worth it. And above all, if it's to be stuck on The Island... I really like the fact you can jump from map to map with your character, your (some of) stuff and your dinos. Like it's reallty cool to tame Rock Drakes on Aberration and then ride them on Raganock or unlock engrams specifics to one map.it's ultimately the exact same game you played before with very little QoL changes.
Knowing the original still put a Series X on its knees... I doubt it could run well, but who know.
Well, ARK and bugs, it's like a love story... I have no doubt there are bugs and I'm sure a good amount, so I wouldn't mind
My biggest concern is if it's only on The Island, I play the game since early access, so I know almost each bush on the map. So buying the game, again to "simply" a slight graphic improvement, it's not worth it. And above all, if it's to be stuck on The Island... I really like the fact you can jump from map to map with your character, your (some of) stuff and your dinos. Like it's reallty cool to tame Rock Drakes on Aberration and then ride them on Raganock or unlock engrams specifics to one map.
I'm aware the "general consensus" it's "it's not worth it", but it cost nothing to ask to someone who actually play it